BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

87 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 206C(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai96Delhi87Karnataka25Kolkata13Mumbai12Chandigarh10Ahmedabad9Indore3Pune3Amritsar3Raipur2Visakhapatnam2Bangalore2Nagpur2Jaipur2SC1Surat1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 234E276Section 200A90Section 200A(1)56Section 15434TDS33Section 5417Exemption17Deduction15Section 20012Section 271H

PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5867/DEL/2016[2014-15 (1st Qtr)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiita Nos.5865/Del/2016, 5866/Del/2016, 5867/Del/2016, 5868/Del/2016, 5869/Del/2016 Asstt. Years: 2013-14, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2014-15, 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. DR
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 220(2)Section 234E

271(1)(a)cannot be imposed if the deductor complies with the requirement of sub-section (3) of section 271H. Hence, it can be said that the fee provided under section 234E would take out from the rigors of penalty under section 271H but of course subject to the outer limit of one year as prescribed under sub-section (3

Showing 1–20 of 87 · Page 1 of 5

10
Section 220(2)7
Penalty7

PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5868/DEL/2016[2014-15 (2nd Qtr)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiita Nos.5865/Del/2016, 5866/Del/2016, 5867/Del/2016, 5868/Del/2016, 5869/Del/2016 Asstt. Years: 2013-14, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2014-15, 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. DR
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 220(2)Section 234E

271(1)(a)cannot be imposed if the deductor complies with the requirement of sub-section (3) of section 271H. Hence, it can be said that the fee provided under section 234E would take out from the rigors of penalty under section 271H but of course subject to the outer limit of one year as prescribed under sub-section (3

PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5866/DEL/2016[2013-14 (4th Qtr)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiita Nos.5865/Del/2016, 5866/Del/2016, 5867/Del/2016, 5868/Del/2016, 5869/Del/2016 Asstt. Years: 2013-14, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2014-15, 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. DR
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 220(2)Section 234E

271(1)(a)cannot be imposed if the deductor complies with the requirement of sub-section (3) of section 271H. Hence, it can be said that the fee provided under section 234E would take out from the rigors of penalty under section 271H but of course subject to the outer limit of one year as prescribed under sub-section (3

PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5869/DEL/2016[2014-15 (4th Qtr)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiita Nos.5865/Del/2016, 5866/Del/2016, 5867/Del/2016, 5868/Del/2016, 5869/Del/2016 Asstt. Years: 2013-14, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2014-15, 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. DR
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 220(2)Section 234E

271(1)(a)cannot be imposed if the deductor complies with the requirement of sub-section (3) of section 271H. Hence, it can be said that the fee provided under section 234E would take out from the rigors of penalty under section 271H but of course subject to the outer limit of one year as prescribed under sub-section (3

PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5865/DEL/2016[2013-14 (2nd Qtr)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiita Nos.5865/Del/2016, 5866/Del/2016, 5867/Del/2016, 5868/Del/2016, 5869/Del/2016 Asstt. Years: 2013-14, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2014-15, 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. DR
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 220(2)Section 234E

271(1)(a)cannot be imposed if the deductor complies with the requirement of sub-section (3) of section 271H. Hence, it can be said that the fee provided under section 234E would take out from the rigors of penalty under section 271H but of course subject to the outer limit of one year as prescribed under sub-section (3

GOVT. GIRLS SR. SECONDARY SCHOOL, AGROHA,HISAR vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5818/DEL/2018[2014-15 (Q 1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 271Section 271H

271 H. 8. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

DRAIPL-BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (JV),NEW DELHI vs. TDS, CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 6709/DEL/2019[2013-14, 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

271 H. 8. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

BRAHMAPUTRA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. TDS, CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 6718/DEL/2019[2013-14,26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

271 H. 8. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

SUPREME BRAHMAPUTRA (JV),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - CPC - TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 6706/DEL/2019[2013-14 (26Q, Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

271 H. 8. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

FRANCHISE INDIA BRANDS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. CPC- TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1274/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

271 H. 9. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7936/DEL/2019[2013-14 (26Q, Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7933/DEL/2019[2013-14 (24Q, Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7945/DEL/2019[2014-15(Q4, 26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7934/DEL/2019[2013-14 (26Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7935/DEL/2019[2013-14 (26Q, Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7951/DEL/2019[2015-16 (26Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7931/DEL/2019[2013-14 (24Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7937/DEL/2019[2013-14 (27Q, Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7949/DEL/2019[2015-16 (24Q, Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 7947/DEL/2019[2015-16(24Q, Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 54

271 H. 11. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue