35 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 200A(1)(c)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 35 · Page 1 of 2
Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava
271 H. 8. The ld. DR submitted that in a number of cases, various High Courts have upheld the validity of provisions of section 234E which provides for imposition of fee for delayed filing of statement of TDS. Hon’ble High Courts have categorically held that the provisions are not ultra vires and not violative of constitution. The issue