BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

710 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 153clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi710Mumbai447Jaipur215Ahmedabad105Bangalore104Karnataka101Chennai99Chandigarh65Kolkata60Hyderabad57Indore51Pune47Allahabad42Raipur38Cochin29Rajkot23Lucknow20Guwahati18Dehradun15Surat15Cuttack14Nagpur13Panaji13Agra11Jabalpur9Visakhapatnam6Amritsar4SC2Rajasthan2Patna1Calcutta1Telangana1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 153A98Addition to Income71Section 271(1)(c)64Section 143(3)42Penalty42Section 13228Section 69A25Search & Seizure24Section 274

M/S. SPAZE TOWERS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the application filed under Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 2045/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Nov 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant, Accountnat Member & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: 1. the Learned CIT(A) has erred in law & facts of the case in sustaining the pen
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 4

153 A. The said return reflects the correct income which had been declared and surrendered by the assessee during the search. In fact the income declared in the return is. more than the surrendered amount of Rs. 27 crores in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). In such facts and circumstances 1 am afraid penalty cannot be levied u/s 271

Showing 1–20 of 710 · Page 1 of 36

...
20
Section 69C16
Section 143(2)16
Natural Justice13

M/S. SPAZE TOWERS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the application filed under Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 2044/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Nov 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant, Accountnat Member & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: 1. the Learned CIT(A) has erred in law & facts of the case in sustaining the pen
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 4

153 A. The said return reflects the correct income which had been declared and surrendered by the assessee during the search. In fact the income declared in the return is. more than the surrendered amount of Rs. 27 crores in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). In such facts and circumstances 1 am afraid penalty cannot be levied u/s 271

DCIT, FARIDABAD vs. M/S. SPAZE TOWER PVT. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the application filed under Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 2558/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Nov 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant, Accountnat Member & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: 1. the Learned CIT(A) has erred in law & facts of the case in sustaining the pen
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 4

153 A. The said return reflects the correct income which had been declared and surrendered by the assessee during the search. In fact the income declared in the return is. more than the surrendered amount of Rs. 27 crores in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). In such facts and circumstances 1 am afraid penalty cannot be levied u/s 271

AYUSH GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE- 7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8163/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

ASHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8171/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

ASHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8170/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

ASHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8167/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

KUNAL GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8162/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

AYUSH GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8165/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

AKSHAY GUPTA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8100/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

ASHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8169/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

AKSHAY GUPTA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8102/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

KUNAL GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8161/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

ASHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8168/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

AYUSH GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8164/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

ASHHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8166/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

ASHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8172/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

AKSHAY GUPTA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8101/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

penalty proceedings under section 271(l) (c) of the act in aforesaid cases is similarly worded. The extract of the same is taken and reproduced below from one of such orders. “5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed his return u/s 153

JAYANTI DALMIA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

The appeals are dismissed

ITA 3926/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar BindalFor Respondent: Shri S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 132Section 142Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(b)

u/s 271 (1) (b) of the act. 28. On the issue regarding applicability of the decision of the another person, Mr Sanjay Dalmia as well as Mr.Manish Periwal, we find that coordinate bench orders in case of Mr Sanjay Dalmia are also based on the same documents on which the penalty proceedings are in case of the assessee. There

THE MAMURPUR CO-OPERATIVE THRIFT AND CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE- 38, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1370/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Kant

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 269TSection 271DSection 271ESection 27ISection 80P

153 A read with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act on 20.12.2016, referred the case to the respondent for initiation of penalty proceeding under Section 271-D and 271-E of the Act in Assessment Year 2009-10 and 2011, vide letter dated 27.4.2017, on receiving the information from the office by the Deputy Commissioner of Income