CHANDRA KANT SHARMA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-26, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the three appeals of the appellant/assessee are allowed

142A Tax Act was made to the DVO vide letter dated 16/19.10.2015\nfor fair market valuation of land held by the assessee. The report was submitted\nby the DVO vide letter dated 22.02.2016. Subsequently, another letter was\nissued to the DVO vide letter dated 14.03.2016 was issued to re-submit the fair\nmarket valuation as important evidences found during search

SH. CHANDRA KANT SHARMA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the three appeals of the appellant/assessee are allowed

271 AAB, penalty of Rs.3,18,00,375/- was imposed.\n\n9. Against assessment order dated 13.5.2016 and penalty orders dated\n25.11.2016, appellant/assessee preferred separate appeal before the Ld. CIT(A)\nwhich were dismissed vide separate orders dated 30.12.2016, 05.05.2017 and\n28.04.2017.\n\n10. Being aggrieved, appellant/assessee has preferred above captioned three\nappeals.\n\n11. Learned Authorised Representative

SANGITA KSHETRY,NOIDA vs. ACIT,CIRCLE INT.TAX. 2(1)(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assesses in ITA 1876/Del/2023, ITA

Bench: Sh. C.N. Prasad & Sh. Naveen Chandraassessment Year: 2016-17

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Assessee craves leave to add to, alter, amend and/or withdraw any ground or grounds appeal either before or during the course of hearing appeal. Synopsis 3. The representatives of both the sides were heard at length, the case records carefully perused and we have duly considered the documentary evidences

HERSH VARDHAN KSHETRY,NOIDA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE INT. TAX. 2(1)(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assesses in ITA 1876/Del/2023, ITA

Bench: Sh. C.N. Prasad & Sh. Naveen Chandraassessment Year: 2016-17

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Assessee craves leave to add to, alter, amend and/or withdraw any ground or grounds appeal either before or during the course of hearing appeal. Synopsis 3. The representatives of both the sides were heard at length, the case records carefully perused and we have duly considered the documentary evidences

NINA KSHETRY,NOIDA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE INT.TAX. 2(1)(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assesses in ITA 1876/Del/2023, ITA

Bench: Sh. C.N. Prasad & Sh. Naveen Chandraassessment Year: 2016-17

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Assessee craves leave to add to, alter, amend and/or withdraw any ground or grounds appeal either before or during the course of hearing appeal. Synopsis 3. The representatives of both the sides were heard at length, the case records carefully perused and we have duly considered the documentary evidences

MADHAV RASTOGI,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-61(2), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2010-11] Madhav Rastogi, Vs Ito, 2, Sreeniketan Apartments, 24, Ward-61(2), Vasundhara Enclave, New Delhi. New Delhi-110096. Pan-Ahopr9376D Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Madhav Rastogi, Adv. Respondent By Shri Om Prakash, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 22.04.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 20.05.2022

penalty proceedings u/s 271(b) for not attending his office and required me to attend his office on August 24, 2017. This show cause notice itself was dispatched on August 22, 2017 and received by me on the evening of August 23, 2017. 9. I attended the office of the AO on August 24, 2017 and provided him copies