BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

84 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi84Bangalore83Mumbai80Hyderabad62Jaipur61Pune41Rajkot40Chennai29Ahmedabad23Kolkata22Chandigarh19Amritsar19Indore18Patna17Ranchi15Surat15Nagpur8Lucknow7Raipur6Jodhpur6Guwahati4Cuttack4Allahabad3Visakhapatnam3Panaji3Cochin2Jabalpur1Dehradun1Agra1

Key Topics

Addition to Income60Penalty42Survey u/s 133A41Section 14740Section 13238Section 40A(3)37Section 37(1)36Section 133A35Section 143(3)33Section 271C

DCIT, CIRCLE 22(2), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. SAHIL VACHANI, DELHI

Appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2604/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice Presdient (), Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shriavdhesh Kumar Mishraआअसं.2604/िद"ी/2023(िन.व. 2016-17)

For Appellant: S/Shri Anuj Garg & Narpat Singh, Sr.DRFor Respondent: S/Shri Rohan Khare & Priyam
Section 271(1)(c)Section 54F

u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 5.4 In this regard the appellant stated that it has not litigated the addition offered by it and it has also paid due taxes. The appellant submitted that the construction was delayed by the contractor which was beyond the control of the appellant and the same was not deliberately delayed. The appellant

MAHALUXMI REALTECH PVT. LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 84 · Page 1 of 5

33
Section 153A30
Disallowance25
ITA 5827/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Nov 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Mritunjay Prashad Dwivedi, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153CSection 271(1)(c)Section 68

penalty U/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Since the underlying facts are identical in both the appeals, they were heard together and are disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. Representatives of both the sides were heard at length. The case records carefully perused and the relevant documentary evidences brought on record

MAHALUXMI REALTECH PVT. LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 5826/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Mritunjay Prashad Dwivedi, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153CSection 271(1)(c)Section 68

penalty U/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Since the underlying facts are identical in both the appeals, they were heard together and are disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. Representatives of both the sides were heard at length. The case records carefully perused and the relevant documentary evidences brought on record

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. PACL LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2884/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Jun 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: the Hon'ble ITAT, however, Assessing Officer rejected the same and proceeded to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act amounting to Rs.12,51,51,671/- which is 100% of the tax sought to be evaded.

Section 132Section 133ASection 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

133A of the Act on the business premises of the assessee on 22/03/2010, based on the findings of the above survey action the additions made in the assessment proceedings are as under:- (i) Trading addition Rs.10,00,00,000/- (ii) Addition on account of disallowance of land/farm development expenses Rs.1,71,54,550/- (iii) Addition on account of disallowance brokerage/commission

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 356/DEL/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 355/DEL/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 364/DEL/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 360/DEL/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 363/DEL/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 362/DEL/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 361/DEL/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 365/DEL/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 357/DEL/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 358/DEL/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

PUSHPA RANI ,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 , DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 359/DEL/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

section 133A, it may, in any proceeding under this Act, be presumed— 12 | P a g e (i) that such books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing belong or belongs to such person; (ii) that the contents of such books of account and other documents are true; and (iii) that the signature

VATIKA SOVEREIGN PARK PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-26(1), NEW DELHI

The appeals are allowed

ITA 7251/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. G.S.Pannu, Hon’Ble & Sh. Anubhav Sharmaita No.7251 & 7252/Del/2019 (Assessment Year : 2016-17 & 2017-18) Vatika Sovereign Park Private Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, 621A, 6Th Floor, Devika Towers Circle-26(1) 6-Nehru Place New Delhi New Delhi-110019 Pan No. Aafcp9383D (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 271C

133A was carried out at the business/office premises of the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) by the DCIT (TDS), Panchkula who forwarded the details and findings of the survey. On detailed examination of the survey report and verification of the facts of the case of assessee, the LD.AO noticed that TDS was not made on payment of External Development Charges

VATIKA SOVEREIGN PARK PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-26(1), NEW DELHI

The appeals are allowed

ITA 7252/DEL/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. G.S.Pannu, Hon’Ble & Sh. Anubhav Sharmaita No.7251 & 7252/Del/2019 (Assessment Year : 2016-17 & 2017-18) Vatika Sovereign Park Private Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, 621A, 6Th Floor, Devika Towers Circle-26(1) 6-Nehru Place New Delhi New Delhi-110019 Pan No. Aafcp9383D (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 271C

133A was carried out at the business/office premises of the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) by the DCIT (TDS), Panchkula who forwarded the details and findings of the survey. On detailed examination of the survey report and verification of the facts of the case of assessee, the LD.AO noticed that TDS was not made on payment of External Development Charges

PIVOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD,GURGAON vs. ADDI. CIT SPL. RANGE 76, NEW DELHI

The appeal are allowed

ITA 6261/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Anubhav Sharmaita No. 6261/Del/2019, A.Y. 2014-15

Section 133ASection 194CSection 271C

133A was carried out at the business/office premises of the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) by the DCIT (TDS), Panchkula who forwarded the details and findings of the survey. On detailed examination of the survey report and verification of the facts of the case of assessee, the LD.AO noticed that TDS was not made on payment of External Development Charges

GAYATRI VILLA,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT CENTRAL RANGE, MEERUT

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 615/DEL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Kumar Upadhyay
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 269SSection 271(1)(c)Section 271D

133A of the Act was conducted at the business premises of the partners of the assessee firm on 26.09.2018. During the course of survey, the partners of the assessee firm were required to produce books of accounts for the current and previous years with supporting documents to verify the sale of flats/turnover declared and expenses claimed in the previous years

GAYATRI VILLA ,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT CENTRAL RANGE, MEERUT

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 616/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Kumar Upadhyay
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 269SSection 271(1)(c)Section 271D

133A of the Act was conducted at the business premises of the partners of the assessee firm on 26.09.2018. During the course of survey, the partners of the assessee firm were required to produce books of accounts for the current and previous years with supporting documents to verify the sale of flats/turnover declared and expenses claimed in the previous years