BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 10(2688)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi16Dehradun2

Key Topics

Section 153A32Section 27116Section 271(1)(c)16Penalty16Addition to Income16

RAMA HYGIENIC PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2692/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA HYGIENIC PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2688/DEL/2024[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Delhi
09 Apr 2025
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA HYGIENIC PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. CENTRAL DELHI-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2691/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA HYGIENIC PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2690/DEL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA ALLIED PRODUCTS MARKETING PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2672/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA ALLIED PRODUCTS MARKETING PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2668/DEL/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA ALLIED PRODUCTS MARKETING PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2669/DEL/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA ALLIED PRODUCTS MARKETING PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2670/DEL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA ALLIED PRODUCTS MARKETING PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2671/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA PASHU AAHAR PRIVATE LIMITED,BULANDSHAHR vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2673/DEL/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA PASHU AAHAR PRIVATE LIMITED ,BULANDSHAHR vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2674/DEL/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA PASHU AAHAR PRIVATE LIMITED,BULANDSHAHR vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2675/DEL/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA HYGIENIC PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2687/DEL/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

RAMA HYGIENIC PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

ITA 2689/DEL/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

MANMOHAN KHEMKA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WAQRD-61(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 2688/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing

DCIT, CIRCLE- I, FARIDABAD vs. INTUITENT ONLINE VENTURE P. LTD., FARIDABAD

ITA 2687/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri Madhav Kapur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amisha Gupta, CIT DR
Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 153A/143(3) of the Act, penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Declining the contentions raised by the assessee, AO proceeded to levy the penalty of Rs.7,23,020/- @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded. 6. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the penalty by dismissing