BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,116 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Search & Seizureclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,116Mumbai833Jaipur324Kolkata202Hyderabad197Pune184Indore165Bangalore147Surat122Karnataka103Chennai99Ahmedabad71Chandigarh60Rajkot54Lucknow49Cuttack48Allahabad40Visakhapatnam38Guwahati32Amritsar29Nagpur29Patna26Raipur24Agra15Cochin15Ranchi15Jodhpur9Jabalpur5SC3Dehradun3Punjab & Haryana2Calcutta1Rajasthan1Telangana1Varanasi1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 153A101Addition to Income74Penalty53Section 13252Section 271(1)(c)51Search & Seizure48Section 271(1)(b)42Section 153C38Section 142(1)36

M/S. NIRALA HOUSING PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the five appeals are dismissed

ITA 3135/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.K. Yadav & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Sh. Rahul Khare, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Manoj Kumar Chopra, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1)(c) of I.T. Act was in respect of the aforesaid total amount of Rs. 83,00,000/- which was in addition to penalty levied U/s 271AAA, amounting to Rs. 2,00,000/- in respect of the aforesaid Rs. 20,00,000/-. (4) NDPL filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) against levy of penalty of aforesaid

Showing 1–20 of 1,116 · Page 1 of 56

...
Section 143(3)32
Section 6829
Natural Justice19

M/S. NIRALA HOUSING PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the five appeals are dismissed

ITA 3137/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.K. Yadav & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Sh. Rahul Khare, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Manoj Kumar Chopra, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1)(c) of I.T. Act was in respect of the aforesaid total amount of Rs. 83,00,000/- which was in addition to penalty levied U/s 271AAA, amounting to Rs. 2,00,000/- in respect of the aforesaid Rs. 20,00,000/-. (4) NDPL filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) against levy of penalty of aforesaid

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S NIRALA HOUSING PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the five appeals are dismissed

ITA 3531/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.K. Yadav & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Sh. Rahul Khare, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Manoj Kumar Chopra, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1)(c) of I.T. Act was in respect of the aforesaid total amount of Rs. 83,00,000/- which was in addition to penalty levied U/s 271AAA, amounting to Rs. 2,00,000/- in respect of the aforesaid Rs. 20,00,000/-. (4) NDPL filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) against levy of penalty of aforesaid

M/S. NIRALA HOUSING PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the five appeals are dismissed

ITA 3136/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.K. Yadav & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Sh. Rahul Khare, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Manoj Kumar Chopra, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1)(c) of I.T. Act was in respect of the aforesaid total amount of Rs. 83,00,000/- which was in addition to penalty levied U/s 271AAA, amounting to Rs. 2,00,000/- in respect of the aforesaid Rs. 20,00,000/-. (4) NDPL filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) against levy of penalty of aforesaid

NIRALA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the five appeals are dismissed

ITA 3155/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.K. Yadav & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Sh. Rahul Khare, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Manoj Kumar Chopra, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

271(1)(c) of I.T. Act was in respect of the aforesaid total amount of Rs. 83,00,000/- which was in addition to penalty levied U/s 271AAA, amounting to Rs. 2,00,000/- in respect of the aforesaid Rs. 20,00,000/-. (4) NDPL filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) against levy of penalty of aforesaid

HONEY NAYYAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 20, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 6213/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Frat Khan, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty u/s 271(l)(b) and are decided as under: 6.1 The chronology of events is as under: • Search and seizure

HONEY NAYYAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 20, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 6214/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Frat Khan, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty u/s 271(l)(b) and are decided as under: 6.1 The chronology of events is as under: • Search and seizure

HONEY NAYYAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 20, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 6211/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Frat Khan, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty u/s 271(l)(b) and are decided as under: 6.1 The chronology of events is as under: • Search and seizure

HONEY NAYYAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 20, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 6209/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Frat Khan, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty u/s 271(l)(b) and are decided as under: 6.1 The chronology of events is as under: • Search and seizure

HONEY NAYYAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 20, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 6212/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Frat Khan, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty u/s 271(l)(b) and are decided as under: 6.1 The chronology of events is as under: • Search and seizure

HONEY NAYYAR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 20, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the 6 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 6210/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Anil Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Frat Khan, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty u/s 271(l)(b) and are decided as under: 6.1 The chronology of events is as under: • Search and seizure

AKSHAY GUPTA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8102/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

271 AAB of the Act on account of additional income of Rs. 2,10,723/- offered by the assessee in his return of income filed u/s 153A while ignoring the facts, written submissions and evidences placed on record and rejecting the bonafide explanation of the assessee for non- imposition of the penalty. Thus, the penalty so levied should be cancelled

KUNAL GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8161/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

271 AAB of the Act on account of additional income of Rs. 2,10,723/- offered by the assessee in his return of income filed u/s 153A while ignoring the facts, written submissions and evidences placed on record and rejecting the bonafide explanation of the assessee for non- imposition of the penalty. Thus, the penalty so levied should be cancelled

ASHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8169/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

271 AAB of the Act on account of additional income of Rs. 2,10,723/- offered by the assessee in his return of income filed u/s 153A while ignoring the facts, written submissions and evidences placed on record and rejecting the bonafide explanation of the assessee for non- imposition of the penalty. Thus, the penalty so levied should be cancelled

ASHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8168/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

271 AAB of the Act on account of additional income of Rs. 2,10,723/- offered by the assessee in his return of income filed u/s 153A while ignoring the facts, written submissions and evidences placed on record and rejecting the bonafide explanation of the assessee for non- imposition of the penalty. Thus, the penalty so levied should be cancelled

ASHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8172/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

271 AAB of the Act on account of additional income of Rs. 2,10,723/- offered by the assessee in his return of income filed u/s 153A while ignoring the facts, written submissions and evidences placed on record and rejecting the bonafide explanation of the assessee for non- imposition of the penalty. Thus, the penalty so levied should be cancelled

AYUSH GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8165/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

271 AAB of the Act on account of additional income of Rs. 2,10,723/- offered by the assessee in his return of income filed u/s 153A while ignoring the facts, written submissions and evidences placed on record and rejecting the bonafide explanation of the assessee for non- imposition of the penalty. Thus, the penalty so levied should be cancelled

AKSHAY GUPTA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8100/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

271 AAB of the Act on account of additional income of Rs. 2,10,723/- offered by the assessee in his return of income filed u/s 153A while ignoring the facts, written submissions and evidences placed on record and rejecting the bonafide explanation of the assessee for non- imposition of the penalty. Thus, the penalty so levied should be cancelled

AYUSH GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8164/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

271 AAB of the Act on account of additional income of Rs. 2,10,723/- offered by the assessee in his return of income filed u/s 153A while ignoring the facts, written submissions and evidences placed on record and rejecting the bonafide explanation of the assessee for non- imposition of the penalty. Thus, the penalty so levied should be cancelled

ASHHISH MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 8166/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 153ASection 271Section 271A

271 AAB of the Act on account of additional income of Rs. 2,10,723/- offered by the assessee in his return of income filed u/s 153A while ignoring the facts, written submissions and evidences placed on record and rejecting the bonafide explanation of the assessee for non- imposition of the penalty. Thus, the penalty so levied should be cancelled