SHIV KUMAR JATIA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 10(2), NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 7256/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 241/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Sh. Shiv Kumar Jatia, Vs Income Tax Officer, B-50, Gulmohar Park, Ward-10(2), New Delhi-110049 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabpj7582K Assessee By : Sh. C. S. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Prakash Dubey, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.03.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.04.2021

vb) any sum chargeable to income-tax under clause (iiib) of section 28; (vc) any sum chargeable to income-tax under clause (iiic) of section 28; (vd) the value of any benefit or perquisite taxable under clause (iv) of section 28; (ve) any sum chargeable to income-tax under clause (v) of section 28; (vi) any capital gains chargeable under

DDIT, DEHRADUN vs. BG EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ground No. 2 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri I. C. Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishidy. Director Of Income Tax, Bg Exploration & Production India International Taxation, Ltd, Dehradun Bg House, Vs. Lake Boulevard Road, Hiranandani Business Park, Powai, Mumbai Pan: Aaace4569K (Appellant) (Respondent)

9) Such highly technical experts may not be required by assessee all the time. Thus, economically and commercially unviable for assessee to employ such personnel on permanent basis. Hence, need based support obtained. 10) Assessee's prerogative to use services from Group enterprises or / and third parties -directing the assessee on how to conduct its business operations is beyond

ARADHYA GHOSH,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-69(1), DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

house property and income from other sources during the 2 ITA.No.1788/Del./2022 Shri Aradhya Ghosh, Kolkata. financial year relevant to the assessment year under consideration. The assessee filed return of income on 31.05.2017 declaring total income of Rs.42,63,710/- which was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Later, the assessee filed his revised

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-1) vs. LATE SHRI SUDHIR SAREEN

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

Section 376 of IPC, the husband would be protected because of MRE. It cannot be the State's policy or in its interest to prosecute only some rapists and not those who are married to the victim in such cases. 46.1. MRE grants blanket immunity to sexual acts enumerated in clauses (a) to (d) of Section