BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “house property”+ Section 80Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai13Jaipur8Pune8Delhi6Kolkata5Indore3Visakhapatnam2Nagpur2Bangalore1Ahmedabad1Allahabad1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 6812Addition to Income6Section 153A5Section 80C5House Property5Section 544Disallowance4Section 143(3)3Survey u/s 133A3

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SHRI RAMIT VOHRA, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4373/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Kohli, CAFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. DR

HOUSE PROPERTY 1,31,761 2. INCOME FROM BUSINESS AND PROFESSION i. Net profit from business as show by the assessee : Rs. 37,29,547 ii. Add: bogus purchase : 20,69,898 iii. Add: Claim of depreciation : Rs. 4,83,994 iv. Add: Interest Payment disallowed : Rs. 1,20,213 v. Add: Personal expenses

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. GAUTAM GULATI, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 7030/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Narender Kumar Choudhry

Business Income3
Section 158B2
Section 44A2
Bench:
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 153ASection 158BSection 80C

house property, disallowance of deductions u/s 80C, 80G and 80D of the Act etc. Aggrieved by the order of AO, Assessee carried the matter before the CIT(A) who vide order dated 08.08.2018 in Appeal Nos. 372 to 374, 384, 385, 397 & 398/16-17 granted substantial relief to the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), Revenue is now before

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SHRI BRIJ GOPAL CHAUHAN PROP., NOIDA

ITA 4679/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Mar 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Tarun Aswani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 145(3)Section 44ASection 68Section 80C

house property. Assessee made cheque payment of Rs. 10 lakhs and cash payment of Rs.33,35,000/- for purchase of above property . Assessee submitted that the above payment of Rs. 46,26,000/- is made from over-draft account. This contention was rejected by the Assessing Officer as no further information was filed. Further addition

SHRI BRIJ GOPAL CHAUHAN,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

ITA 4163/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Tarun Aswani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 145(3)Section 44ASection 68Section 80C

house property. Assessee made cheque payment of Rs. 10 lakhs and cash payment of Rs.33,35,000/- for purchase of above property . Assessee submitted that the above payment of Rs. 46,26,000/- is made from over-draft account. This contention was rejected by the Assessing Officer as no further information was filed. Further addition

SMT. VINAY MEHTA,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2683/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Oct 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.P. Jain

For Appellant: Shri Salil AgarwalFor Respondent: Shri T. Vasanthan Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 54Section 80C

80D of Rs. 14,214/- and Rs. 5,648/- respectively leaving thereby taxable income of Rs.3,95,858/-. The main issue involved in this case is that during the year under assessment assessee has sold a property for consideration of Rs. 77,25,000/-. Accordingly, assessee was asked to file the details in this regard. Computation of income as well

M/S. RAMAN KUMAR SAWHNEY,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6620/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Amir, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 41(1)Section 68

Section 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961, (“I.T. Act”, for short) wherein total income of the Assessee was determined at Rs. 80,52,480/- as per following computation: Income from House Property Income as declared 1,74,052 Business income Net Loss as per P & L a/c (-) 19,94,840 Less: STCG & LTCG