BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “house property”+ Section 69Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur48Bangalore22Chandigarh11Mumbai9Delhi9Indore7Pune6Amritsar5Hyderabad5Cuttack4Cochin3Jodhpur2Varanasi1Nagpur1Rajkot1SC1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 26311Section 115B10Addition to Income8Section 1327Section 153A4Search & Seizure4Section 1392Survey u/s 133A2

BHUSHAN KUMAR GUPTA,HARYANA vs. PR, CIT, ROHTAK, ROHTAK

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1081/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. G. S. Pannu & Shri Chandra Mohan Gargbhushan Kumar Gupta Vs. Pr. Cit House No.130, Sector-11, Rohtak Panipat, Haryana -132 103 Pan No. Aatpg 2846 D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Ruchesh Sinha, Adv. Revenue By Shri Zafarul Haque Tanweer, Cit-D.R. Date Of Hearing: 03.10.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.10.2023

Section 115BSection 263Section 68Section 69

House No.130, Sector-11, Rohtak Panipat, Haryana -132 103 PAN No. AATPG 2846 D (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by Shri Ruchesh Sinha, Adv. Revenue by Shri Zafarul Haque Tanweer, CIT-D.R. Date of hearing: 03.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement: 06.10.2023 PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Pr. Commissioner

BALVINDER SINGH,HARYANA vs. PR,CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 570/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Shri R.K. Gupta, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 139Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)

House No. 222, Urban Estate Rohtak Sector 13, Karnal, Haryana PAN: ADMPS 1819 A (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv Shri Deepesh Garg, Adv Department By : Shri R.K. Gupta, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 22.08.2022 Date of Pronouncement : .08.2022 ORDER PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order dated 01.03.2022 framed

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 5231/DEL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Oct 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 5231/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2005-06 Ita No. 5392/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2006-07 Ita No. 5579/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S Majestic Properties (P) Ltd., Central Circle-2, 1/18B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm7158E Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Deepesh Garg, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Shivani Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 14.10.2022

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Shivani Singh, CIT DR
Section 132

House 7=75 Rohit Cash P.L. A/c 2=00 06/05/08 Opposite side of Page No. 3 20 No. 01.04.03 CR 24.06 A/CT/F/SH 20 No. P.S. 01.04.03 CR 6=40 A/cT/F8Ha/c Opposite side of Page No. 4 N-166 01.04.03 CR 13.08 A/C NiL Opposite side of Page No. 5 SM 01.04.03 CR 20.00 Int 1/4/03 To 10=35 31/12/08 1/1/2009

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 5579/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Oct 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 5231/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2005-06 Ita No. 5392/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2006-07 Ita No. 5579/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S Majestic Properties (P) Ltd., Central Circle-2, 1/18B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm7158E Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Deepesh Garg, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Shivani Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 14.10.2022

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Shivani Singh, CIT DR
Section 132

House 7=75 Rohit Cash P.L. A/c 2=00 06/05/08 Opposite side of Page No. 3 20 No. 01.04.03 CR 24.06 A/CT/F/SH 20 No. P.S. 01.04.03 CR 6=40 A/cT/F8Ha/c Opposite side of Page No. 4 N-166 01.04.03 CR 13.08 A/C NiL Opposite side of Page No. 5 SM 01.04.03 CR 20.00 Int 1/4/03 To 10=35 31/12/08 1/1/2009

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 5392/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Oct 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 5231/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2005-06 Ita No. 5392/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2006-07 Ita No. 5579/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S Majestic Properties (P) Ltd., Central Circle-2, 1/18B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm7158E Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Deepesh Garg, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Shivani Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 14.10.2022

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Shivani Singh, CIT DR
Section 132

House 7=75 Rohit Cash P.L. A/c 2=00 06/05/08 Opposite side of Page No. 3 20 No. 01.04.03 CR 24.06 A/CT/F/SH 20 No. P.S. 01.04.03 CR 6=40 A/cT/F8Ha/c Opposite side of Page No. 4 N-166 01.04.03 CR 13.08 A/C NiL Opposite side of Page No. 5 SM 01.04.03 CR 20.00 Int 1/4/03 To 10=35 31/12/08 1/1/2009

M/S. BHUSHAN STEEL LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed

ITA 1336/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

69D. The reply of the appellant was sent for remand report on all the grounds and the AO has stated that the appellant's version that cash was lying with different persons is an afterthought. It has been further stated by the appellant that the date of search was 3/11/2016 and subsequently on 8/11/2016 demonetization was announced by the Government

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD vs. SOLITAIRE REALINFRA PRIVATE LIMITED, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed

ITA 1336/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Jun 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

69D. The reply of the appellant was sent for remand\nreport on all the grounds and the AO has stated that the appellant's version that\ncash was lying with different persons is an afterthought.\nIt has been further stated by the appellant that the date of search was 3/11/2016 and\nsubsequently on 8/11/2016 demonetization was announced by the Government

SOLITAIRE REALINFRA PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed

ITA 1193/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Jun 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

69D. The reply of the appellant was sent for remand\nreport on all the grounds and the AO has stated that the appellant's version that\ncash was lying with different persons is an afterthought.\nIt has been further stated by the appellant that the date of search was 3/11/2016 and\nsubsequently on 8/11/2016 demonetization was announced by the Government

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD vs. SOLITAIRE REALINFRA PRIVATE LIMITED, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed

ITA 1349/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Jun 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

69D. The reply of the appellant was sent for remand\nreport on all the grounds and the AO has stated that the appellant's version that\ncash was lying with different persons is an afterthought.\nIt has been further stated by the appellant that the date of search was 3/11/2016 and\nsubsequently on 8/11/2016 demonetization was announced by the Government