BHUSHAN KUMAR GUPTA,HARYANA vs. PR, CIT, ROHTAK, ROHTAK

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. G. S. Pannu & Shri Chandra Mohan Gargbhushan Kumar Gupta Vs. Pr. Cit House No.130, Sector-11, Rohtak Panipat, Haryana -132 103 Pan No. Aatpg 2846 D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Ruchesh Sinha, Adv. Revenue By Shri Zafarul Haque Tanweer, Cit-D.R. Date Of Hearing: 03.10.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.10.2023

House No.130, Sector-11, Rohtak Panipat, Haryana -132 103 PAN No. AATPG 2846 D (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by Shri Ruchesh Sinha, Adv. Revenue by Shri Zafarul Haque Tanweer, CIT-D.R. Date of hearing: 03.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement: 06.10.2023 PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Pr. Commissioner

BALVINDER SINGH,HARYANA vs. PR,CIT, ROHTAK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

House No. 222, Urban Estate Rohtak Sector 13, Karnal, Haryana PAN: ADMPS 1819 A (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv Shri Deepesh Garg, Adv Department By : Shri R.K. Gupta, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 22.08.2022 Date of Pronouncement : .08.2022 ORDER PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order dated 01.03.2022 framed

MR. LATE SMT. VINEETA SINGH,GHAZIABAD vs. ACIT, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

property and from other sources. Original return of income was filed declaring the total income at Rs.1,02,067/-. On 10th July 2003, a search was conducted by the CBI at the premises of the assessee's husband Shri Tribhuvan Singh. During the said search, aggregate cash amounting to Rs.21,60,000/- was found, out of which an amount

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 5231/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2005-06 Ita No. 5392/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2006-07 Ita No. 5579/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S Majestic Properties (P) Ltd., Central Circle-2, 1/18B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm7158E Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Deepesh Garg, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Shivani Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 14.10.2022

House 7=75 Rohit Cash P.L. A/c 2=00 06/05/08 Opposite side of Page No. 3 20 No. 01.04.03 CR 24.06 A/CT/F/SH 20 No. P.S. 01.04.03 CR 6=40 A/cT/F8Ha/c Opposite side of Page No. 4 N-166 01.04.03 CR 13.08 A/C NiL Opposite side of Page No. 5 SM 01.04.03 CR 20.00 Int 1/4/03 To 10=35 31/12/08 1/1/2009

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 5231/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2005-06 Ita No. 5392/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2006-07 Ita No. 5579/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S Majestic Properties (P) Ltd., Central Circle-2, 1/18B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm7158E Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Deepesh Garg, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Shivani Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 14.10.2022

House 7=75 Rohit Cash P.L. A/c 2=00 06/05/08 Opposite side of Page No. 3 20 No. 01.04.03 CR 24.06 A/CT/F/SH 20 No. P.S. 01.04.03 CR 6=40 A/cT/F8Ha/c Opposite side of Page No. 4 N-166 01.04.03 CR 13.08 A/C NiL Opposite side of Page No. 5 SM 01.04.03 CR 20.00 Int 1/4/03 To 10=35 31/12/08 1/1/2009

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. MAJESTIC PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 5231/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2005-06 Ita No. 5392/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2006-07 Ita No. 5579/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year 2007-08 Acit, Vs. M/S Majestic Properties (P) Ltd., Central Circle-2, 1/18B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm7158E Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Deepesh Garg, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Shivani Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 14.10.2022

House 7=75 Rohit Cash P.L. A/c 2=00 06/05/08 Opposite side of Page No. 3 20 No. 01.04.03 CR 24.06 A/CT/F/SH 20 No. P.S. 01.04.03 CR 6=40 A/cT/F8Ha/c Opposite side of Page No. 4 N-166 01.04.03 CR 13.08 A/C NiL Opposite side of Page No. 5 SM 01.04.03 CR 20.00 Int 1/4/03 To 10=35 31/12/08 1/1/2009

M/S. BHUSHAN STEEL LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharma

69D. The reply of the appellant was sent for remand report on all the grounds and the AO has stated that the appellant's version that cash was lying with different persons is an afterthought. It has been further stated by the appellant that the date of search was 3/11/2016 and subsequently on 8/11/2016 demonetization was announced by the Government

SOLITAIRE REALINFRA PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT, GHAZIABAD

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmadcit, Central Circle, Ghaziabad.

69D. The reply of the appellant was sent for remand report on all the grounds and the AO has stated that the appellant's version that cash was lying with different persons is an afterthought. It has been further stated by the appellant that the date of search was 3/11/2016 and subsequently on 8/11/2016 demonetization was announced by the Government

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD vs. SOLITAIRE REALINFRA PRIVATE LIMITED, NOIDA

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharma

69D. The reply of the appellant was sent for remand report on all the grounds and the AO has stated that the appellant's version that cash was lying with different persons is an afterthought. It has been further stated by the appellant that the date of search was 3/11/2016 and subsequently on 8/11/2016 demonetization was announced by the Government

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD vs. SOLITAIRE REALINFRA PRIVATE LIMITED, NOIDA

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharma

69D. The reply of the appellant was sent for remand report on all the grounds and the AO has stated that the appellant's version that cash was lying with different persons is an afterthought. It has been further stated by the appellant that the date of search was 3/11/2016 and subsequently on 8/11/2016 demonetization was announced by the Government