BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 50Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai10Bangalore4Delhi3Chennai3Ahmedabad2Hyderabad1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 54F16Section 2636Section 24Capital Gains3Long Term Capital Gains3House Property2Exemption2Deduction2Revision u/s 2632

ANALJIT SINGH,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 16(2), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4737/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2017AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P.Kant

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 50D

section 45 read withsection48oftheAct. 33. Coming to the actual consideration received as per the share purchase agreement dated 12.03.2014, Mr. Vohra submitted that although in terms of original framework agreement’s was entitled to receive aggregate consideration of Rs.855 crores (Rs.1088 crores - Rs.533 crores) from transfer of their remaining shareholding in Scorpio to CGP/GSPL, however, the parties mutually agreed

SH. PRAVEEN KUMAR MALHOTRA,DELHI vs. PR. CIT- 16, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2270/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Delhi
30 Nov 2018
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiasstt. Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Krishnan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meeta Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 263Section 54F

house property is more than the net sale consideration of Rs. 6,74,30,171/- of the shares, therefore, whole of the capital gain was claimed exempt u/s 54F.” 5. Ld. PCIT observed that assessee has inflated the sale consideration of the shares of M/s. Sundial Infotech Pvt. Ltd. and in this garb has introduced her own unaccounted income

SMT. NEELAM MALHOTRA,DELHI vs. PR. CIT- 16, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2271/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiasstt. Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Krishnan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meeta Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 263Section 54F

house property is more than the net sale consideration of Rs. 6,74,30,171/- of the shares, therefore, whole of the capital gain was claimed exempt u/s 54F.” 5. Ld. PCIT observed that assessee has inflated the sale consideration of the shares of M/s. Sundial Infotech Pvt. Ltd. and in this garb has introduced her own unaccounted income