BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “house property”+ Section 271Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi10Jaipur9Mumbai7Ahmedabad3Bangalore3Chennai1Chandigarh1Lucknow1Amritsar1Nagpur1SC1Surat1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 153A13Section 142(1)11Section 143(3)10Addition to Income9Section 1396Section 1486Section 1475Penalty5Section 1444Section 132

DEEP KOTHARI,USA vs. ASSSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIVIC CENTRE NEW DELHI

Appeal is partly allowed

ITA 2250/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. Rachesh Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Rini Handa, Sr. DR
Section 144C(13)Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

property made from the NRE Bank account. 5. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the AO and the DRP erred in not appreciating that the payment of Rs. 98,96,137 to Jawala Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. is part of the total payment of Rs.1,34,36,245/- made during the AY 2014-15. 6. That

4
Undisclosed Income4
Search & Seizure2

OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA,TELANGNA vs. ACIT, CC-26, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 968/DEL/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153ASection 292C

271F of the Act were invalid and bad in law and thus ought to have been dropped. 7. That the total tax demand including interest under section 234A and 234B had been raised amounting to Rs. 557080. The ld. AO did give credit for tax and interest paid on the income disclosed before the Settlement Commission. Interest charged under section

OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA,TELANGNA vs. ACIT, CC-26, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 971/DEL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153ASection 292C

271F of the Act were invalid and bad in law and thus ought to have been dropped. 7. That the total tax demand including interest under section 234A and 234B had been raised amounting to Rs. 557080. The ld. AO did give credit for tax and interest paid on the income disclosed before the Settlement Commission. Interest charged under section

OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA,TELANGNA vs. ACIT, CC-26, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 970/DEL/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153ASection 292C

271F of the Act were invalid and bad in law and thus ought to have been dropped. 7. That the total tax demand including interest under section 234A and 234B had been raised amounting to Rs. 557080. The ld. AO did give credit for tax and interest paid on the income disclosed before the Settlement Commission. Interest charged under section

OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA,TELANGNA vs. ACIT, CC-26, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 969/DEL/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT DR
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153ASection 292C

271F of the Act were invalid and bad in law and thus ought to have been dropped. 7. That the total tax demand including interest under section 234A and 234B had been raised amounting to Rs. 557080. The ld. AO did give credit for tax and interest paid on the income disclosed before the Settlement Commission. Interest charged under section

SHYAM SUNDER ,GURURGAM vs. ITO ( CIRCLE 4(1) , GURGRAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 4779/DEL/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Dec 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Manish Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 2(14)Section 54BSection 54F

house had actually been carried out or completed within the prescribed period of three years. Mere bank withdrawals reflected in the ledger were held to be insufficient. Further, the residential plot was purchased jointly in the name of the assessee and his son, which disentitled the assessee from claiming the full benefit under section 54F. 3.4 With regard

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-32, DELHI vs. RNB INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD., DELHI

26. In view of the above discussion and findings, appeal- ITA No

ITA 845/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Narinder Kumarm/S Rnb International Private Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-32, Delhi Limited, Rnb House, 1, Shivaji Enclave, Main Road, Near Raja Garden, Opp. Mother Dairy, Delhi- 110027 Pan :..Aaccr7687L (Appellant) (Respondent) & Ita/845/Del/2022 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Rnb International Pvt. Limited, Tax, Rnb House, 142A/2, Noida, Sez, Central Circle-32, New Delhi Noida- Dadri Road, U.P. 201305 (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 124Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271FSection 274

House, 142A/2, NOIDA, SEZ, Central Circle-32, New Delhi NOIDA- Dadri Road, U.P. 201305 (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Ved Jain, Advocate, Shri Aman Garg &Ms. Ishika, Cas Department by Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR. Date of hearing 27.08.2024 Date of 27.08.2024 pronouncement ORDER PER : Shri Narinder Kumar, Judicial Member : This common order is to dispose of the above captioned

RNB INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-32, DELHI

26. In view of the above discussion and findings, appeal- ITA No

ITA 629/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Narinder Kumarm/S Rnb International Private Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-32, Delhi Limited, Rnb House, 1, Shivaji Enclave, Main Road, Near Raja Garden, Opp. Mother Dairy, Delhi- 110027 Pan :..Aaccr7687L (Appellant) (Respondent) & Ita/845/Del/2022 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Rnb International Pvt. Limited, Tax, Rnb House, 142A/2, Noida, Sez, Central Circle-32, New Delhi Noida- Dadri Road, U.P. 201305 (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 124Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271FSection 274

House, 142A/2, NOIDA, SEZ, Central Circle-32, New Delhi NOIDA- Dadri Road, U.P. 201305 (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Ved Jain, Advocate, Shri Aman Garg &Ms. Ishika, Cas Department by Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR. Date of hearing 27.08.2024 Date of 27.08.2024 pronouncement ORDER PER : Shri Narinder Kumar, Judicial Member : This common order is to dispose of the above captioned

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI vs. PSK FINANCE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 663/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharatdr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Sanket Milind Joshi, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Subhash Chandra, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132(4)Section 132ASection 139Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271FSection 69A

271F of the Act are initiated for late filing of return of income. Notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued on 27.09.2017 and duly served upon the assessee. 2. The CCIT(Central) accorded administrative approval for centralization 14 cases of the group with the Central Circle-28, New Delhi. The case was centralized with this Circle vide order

DHARAMBIR,GURGAON vs. PR,CIT, FARIDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 787/DEL/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Usdharambir Vs. Pr. Cit Village-Nakhrola, Naharpur, C.R. Building, Faridabad, Gurgaon, Haryana. Haryana. Pan No.Aumpd4924E (Appellant) (Respondent)

271F were however Dharambir 3 initiated for belated filing of return of income. In essence, the AO did not find any deficiency in the explanation offered by the assessee towards source of cash deposits under enquiry in the reassessment proceedings. To put it differently, in the light of material placed in the reassessment proceedings by the assessee, the belief initially