BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai48Karnataka21Mumbai16Jaipur15Ahmedabad7Hyderabad5Delhi4Kolkata4Surat4Bangalore1Nagpur1Pune1Raipur1SC1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 44A6Section 271B5Penalty4Addition to Income3Section 1322Section 153A2Section 2712Exemption2Deduction2Business Income

VIKAS AHUJA IN THE CAPACITY OF LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SH. KRISHAN GOPAL AHUJA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 480/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 May 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishivikas Ahuja Acit, In The Capacity Of Legal Heir Of Vs. Circle-19(1), Late Sh. Krishan Gopal Ahuja, New Delhi C/O. M/S. Arora & Bharat Associates, 3741, Iind Floor, Priya Hotel Building, Netaji Subhash Marg, Daryaganj, New Delhi Pan:Aflpa6325A (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Raman Kumar Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. K. K. Jaiswal, DR
Section 271Section 271BSection 44A

house property, capital gain, commodity business trading and income from other sources. During the year, assessee had total sales consideration of Rs. 65281999/- and had claimed a loss of Rs 2368182/- as short-term capital loss which assessing officer did not allow to be carried forward as return of appellant was filed late. It is seen that appellant has shown

2

PRAVEEN BAKSHI ,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 8 , NEW DELHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for both years are partly allowed as above

ITA 7134/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 132Section 153ASection 271BSection 44A

House Rent Allowances and conveyance allowances aggregating Rs.33,600/- which has been claimed in the Return of Income for A.Y. 2010-11. 2. Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the additions at Rs.7,00,000/- as unexplained credit in Bank on account of sale of immovable Property in AY 2009-10. 3. Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding

PRAVEEN BAKSHI ,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 8 , NEW DELHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for both years are partly allowed as above

ITA 7135/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 132Section 153ASection 271BSection 44A

House Rent Allowances and conveyance allowances aggregating Rs.33,600/- which has been claimed in the Return of Income for A.Y. 2010-11. 2. Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the additions at Rs.7,00,000/- as unexplained credit in Bank on account of sale of immovable Property in AY 2009-10. 3. Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. MAHESH KUMAR, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 173/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Dec 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Smt. Beena Pillai, Jm Ita No. 173/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Dcit, Vs Sh. Mahesh Kumar, Circle-21(1), C-13/170, Sector-3, Rohini, New Delhi Delhi-110085 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aalpk4117B Assessee By : Sh. Ved Jain, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. P. Dum Kanunjna, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 16.09.2016 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.12.2016 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Department Against The Order Dated 17.10.2011 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Xxii, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. P. Dum Kanunjna, CIT DR
Section 143(1)Section 271A

271B of the Act. 4. The appellant craves leave to amend or alter all or any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal and add any other ground of appeal.” 3. Ground Nos. 1 & 2, the grievance of the department relates to the action of the ld. CIT(A) in directing the AO to treat the surplus amount of Rs.81