BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka22Delhi5Mumbai5Visakhapatnam2Jodhpur1Chennai1Jaipur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 234E18Section 200A(1)6Section 200A6Section 10B5TDS4Deduction4Section 542

SUPREME BRAHMAPUTRA (JV),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - CPC - TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 6706/DEL/2019[2013-14 (26Q, Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

Property Services Vs. TDS CPC TDS CPC Pvt. Ltd. Ghaziabad – 211010 A-7, Mahipalpur, Brahmaputra House, New Delhi-110037 Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by None Respondent by Ms. Rakhi Vimal, SR. DR Date of hearing : 25.08.2020 Date of order : 31.08.2020 ORDER PER R.K PANDA, AM: This batch of appeals filed by the respective assessees are directed against the separate orders

DRAIPL-BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (JV),NEW DELHI vs. TDS, CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 6709/DEL/2019[2013-14, 26Q]Status: Disposed
ITAT Delhi
31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

Property Services Vs. TDS CPC TDS CPC Pvt. Ltd. Ghaziabad – 211010 A-7, Mahipalpur, Brahmaputra House, New Delhi-110037 Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by None Respondent by Ms. Rakhi Vimal, SR. DR Date of hearing : 25.08.2020 Date of order : 31.08.2020 ORDER PER R.K PANDA, AM: This batch of appeals filed by the respective assessees are directed against the separate orders

BRAHMAPUTRA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. TDS, CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 6718/DEL/2019[2013-14,26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

Property Services Vs. TDS CPC TDS CPC Pvt. Ltd. Ghaziabad – 211010 A-7, Mahipalpur, Brahmaputra House, New Delhi-110037 Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by None Respondent by Ms. Rakhi Vimal, SR. DR Date of hearing : 25.08.2020 Date of order : 31.08.2020 ORDER PER R.K PANDA, AM: This batch of appeals filed by the respective assessees are directed against the separate orders

SANJAY JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal is partly allowed

ITA 146/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri O.P. Kant Assessment Year: 2010-11 Sanjay Jain, Vs. Acit, Chamber No. 488, Circle 37(1), Delhi High Court Block-Ii. New Delhi. Sher Shah Road, New Delhi. (Pan: Aagpj8607A) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Ra Bansal & Smt. Prem Lata Bansal, Adv. Department By : Smt. Anima Barnwal, Dr Date Of Hearing : 21.03.2016 Date Of Pronouncement: 15 :06.2016 Order Per I.C. Sudhir:The Assessee Has Questioned First Appellate Order On The Following Grounds: 1. That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Addition Of Rs.16,70,574/- Made By The Assessing Officer To The Long Term Capital Gain Declared By The Assessee At Rs.1,47,823/-. Since The Addition Made By The Assessing Officer Is Contrary To Law & Therefore, Liable To Be Set Aside. 2. That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Ignoring The Cost Of Improvement While Calculating Long Term Capital Gain Earned By The Assessee On Transfer Of Property.

For Appellant: Shri RA Bansal & Smt. Prem LataFor Respondent: Smt. Anima Barnwal, DR
Section 28Section 37Section 40A(3)Section 48Section 54

section 55(2) and the term “cost of improvement” has been defined in sec. 55(1)(d). As per the above provisions, cost of any improvement in relation to any capital assets other than good will and manufacturing rights etc. provided in sub-clause (i) 10 means all expenditure of a capital nature incurred in making any additions or alterations

Commissioner of Income Tax – I

ITA/551/2013HC Delhi05 Feb 2015
Section 10B

house fabrication in addition to inspection at the vendors factory to whom the production or manufacture had been outsourced. Once the goods were received at the Noida unit, they were examined and assembled and tested. Rust protection was undertaken. Big assemblies were disassembled and repacked. Small assemblies were packed as such. Thereupon, the goods were exported from India and erected