BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “house property”+ Section 151Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai42Mumbai15Chandigarh11Delhi10Agra6Visakhapatnam6Lucknow5Hyderabad5Jaipur5Pune4Ahmedabad1Indore1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 14744Section 6815Section 15114Section 14813Reassessment10Addition to Income10Section 2508Section 69A8House Property8Natural Justice

CHIRAG KIRPAL,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 656/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumarchirag Kirpal, Vs. Acit, C/O. Anuj Bhatia, C-3, Bali International Taxation, Nagar, New Raja Garden, Gurgaon New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Bwxpk8788D Assessee By : Shri. S. K. Gupta, Ca Revenue By: Shri M. S. Nethrapal, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 17/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/09/2025

For Appellant: Shri. S. K. Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Shri M. S. Nethrapal, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 144BSection 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148
7
Section 115B4
Section 13
Section 148A
Section 151

property for Rs. 65 lakhs during the year under consideration. Since the said transaction is more than the maximum amount not chargeable to tax and Assessee being a non-filer of income tax return, notice under section 148 of the Act stood issued to the Assessee on 29-03-2023 by ITO (International Tax), Gurgoan. In response to the said

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 63(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1435/DEL/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2012-2013
Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

section\n1\nITA No.1435/Del/2024\n[Assessment Year 2012-13]\nCIT(A), NFAC,\nDelhi order dated\n30.01.2024\n28.12.2019\n144 r.w.s.147 of the\nIncome Tax Act,\n1961.\n2.\nITA No.1434/Del/2024\n[Assessment Year 2013-14]\nCIT(A), NFAC,\nDelhi order dated\n30.01.2024\n30.03.2022\n147 r.w.s.144B of\nthe Income Tax Act,\n1961.\n3.\nITA No.1433/Del/2024\n[Assessment Year 2014-15]\nCIT(A), NFAC

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1429/DEL/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 151Section 234ASection 250Section 69A

151A as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961, is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. That in any case and in any view of the matter, assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 and passing the impugned order u/s 147/144B, is illegal, bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1430/DEL/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 151Section 234ASection 250Section 69A

151A as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961, is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. That in any case and in any view of the matter, assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 and passing the impugned order u/s 147/144B, is illegal, bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1431/DEL/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 151Section 234ASection 250Section 69A

151A as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961, is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. That in any case and in any view of the matter, assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 and passing the impugned order u/s 147/144B, is illegal, bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case

ATAR SINGH,DELHI vs. ITO,WARD 70 (1)-DELHI, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 186/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Mr. R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151ASection 282Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)Section 69A

House of Parliament.\"\n\n7. I find that the Notification suggested in section 151A(1) of the Act has\nbeen issued only on 29-3-2022. When the faceless regime for income escaping\nassessment stood notified only on 29-3-2022, the Learned FAO assuming\njurisdiction by issuing notices under section 142(1) of the Act under faceless\nregime

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1432/DEL/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2012-13] Sunita Bhardwaj, Vs Acit, 1/2, Taj Apartments, Circle-63(1), R.K.Puram, Sector-12, Delhi Delhi-110022. Pan-Ahfpb1928E Appellant Respondent

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

section 1 28.12.2019 CIT(A), NFAC, 144 r.w.s. 147 of the [Assessment Year 2012-13] Delhi order dated Income Tax Act, 30.01.2024 1961. 2. 30.03.2022 CIT(A), NFAC, 147 r.w.s. 144B of [Assessment Year 2013-14] Delhi order dated the Income Tax Act, 30.01.2024 1961. 3. 30.03.2022 CIT(A), NFAC, 147 r.w.s. 144B of [Assessment Year 2014-15] Delhi order

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1434/DEL/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2012-13] Sunita Bhardwaj, Vs Acit, 1/2, Taj Apartments, Circle-63(1), R.K.Puram, Sector-12, Delhi Delhi-110022. Pan-Ahfpb1928E Appellant Respondent

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

section 1 28.12.2019 CIT(A), NFAC, 144 r.w.s. 147 of the [Assessment Year 2012-13] Delhi order dated Income Tax Act, 30.01.2024 1961. 2. 30.03.2022 CIT(A), NFAC, 147 r.w.s. 144B of [Assessment Year 2013-14] Delhi order dated the Income Tax Act, 30.01.2024 1961. 3. 30.03.2022 CIT(A), NFAC, 147 r.w.s. 144B of [Assessment Year 2014-15] Delhi order

SUMAN KISHORE,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

ITA 1434/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Apr 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2012-13] Sunita Bhardwaj, Vs Acit, 1/2, Taj Apartments, Circle-63(1), R.K.Puram, Sector-12, Delhi Delhi-110022. Pan-Ahfpb1928E Appellant Respondent

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

section 1 28.12.2019 CIT(A), NFAC, 144 r.w.s. 147 of the [Assessment Year 2012-13] Delhi order dated Income Tax Act, 30.01.2024 1961. 2. 30.03.2022 CIT(A), NFAC, 147 r.w.s. 144B of [Assessment Year 2013-14] Delhi order dated the Income Tax Act, 30.01.2024 1961. 3. 30.03.2022 CIT(A), NFAC, 147 r.w.s. 144B of [Assessment Year 2014-15] Delhi order

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1433/DEL/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2014-2015
Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

section\n1 | ITA No.1435/Del/2024\n[Assessment Year 2012-13]\nCIT(A), NFAC,\nDelhi order dated\n30.01.2024\n28.12.2019\n144 r.w.s.147 of the\nIncome Tax Act,\n1961.\n2. | ITA No.1434/Del/2024\n[Assessment Year 2013-14]\nCIT(A), NFAC,\nDelhi order dated\n30.01.2024\n30.03.2022\n147 r.w.s.144B of\nthe Income Tax Act,\n1961.\n3. | ITA No.1433/Del/2024\n[Assessment Year 2014-15]\nCIT(A), NFAC