BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

182 results for “house property”+ Section 10B(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi182Mumbai171Bangalore136Kolkata94Ahmedabad59Hyderabad52Chennai39Jaipur31Pune26Lucknow21Cuttack12Chandigarh9Indore8Varanasi7Surat6Agra4Telangana4Karnataka3Cochin2Jodhpur1Himachal Pradesh1Kerala1Rajkot1Patna1

Key Topics

Addition to Income76Section 143(3)67Transfer Pricing48Section 10A45Section 92C40Deduction39Comparables/TP33Section 144C32Disallowance32

CIT vs. TEI TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

ITA/2067/2010HC Delhi27 Aug 2012

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 260ASection 72

house property, profits and gains from business, capital gains and income from other sources, the total is arrived at and it is from this total that the losses of the current year and the brought forward losses from the past years are to be set off. The resultant figure gives the gross total income of the assessee from which deductions

CIT vs. TEI TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

ITA/347/2011HC Delhi27 Aug 2012

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

Section 10A

Showing 1–20 of 182 · Page 1 of 10

...
Section 12A28
Section 80I21
Section 115J21
Section 143(3)
Section 260A
Section 72

house property, profits and gains from business, capital gains and income from other sources, the total is arrived at and it is from this total that the losses of the current year and the brought forward losses from the past years are to be set off. The resultant figure gives the gross total income of the assessee from which deductions

ACIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. WINDLASS STEEL CRAFT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 5506/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Nov 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Smt. Beena Pillai, Jm Ita No. 5506/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs M/S Windlass Steel Craft, Circle-1, 11-A, Rajpur Road, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaafw0958M Assessee By : Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Ca Revenue By : Sh. P. Dum Kanunjna, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 30.09.2015 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.11.2015 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am:

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Sh. P. Dum Kanunjna, Sr. DR
Section 10BSection 80HSection 80I

Section 10B of IT Act and such reliance is totally misplaced. 7. The order of Ld. CIT(A) in allowing claim of deduction u/s 10B to the assessee is bad in law warranted to be set aside and that of the AO be resorted. 8. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition

Commissioner of Income Tax – I

ITA/551/2013HC Delhi05 Feb 2015
Section 10B

house fabrication in addition to inspection at the vendors factory to whom the production or manufacture had been outsourced. Once the goods were received at the Noida unit, they were examined and assembled and tested. Rust protection was undertaken. Big assemblies were disassembled and repacked. Small assemblies were packed as such. Thereupon, the goods were exported from India and erected

NEC HCL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result we confirm the finding the of the CIT (A) regarding deletion of disallowance u/s 40a (i) of The Income tax Act of Rs

ITA 5497/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anuj Arora, CIT (DR)
Section 10ASection 10A(8)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

8 | P a g e NEC HCL System Technologies Ltd. V ACIT ITA No 5497/Del /2012 A.Y. 2008-09 ACIT V NEC HCL System Technologies Ltd. ITA No 5804/Del/2012 A.Y. 2008-09 manufacture or produce articles or things or computer software, as the case may be, shall be allowed from the total income of the assessee..." 3.2 The effect

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I, NOIDA, NOIDA vs. M/S ADVANT IT PARK PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 5332/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 143(3)

8 ITA Nos.5332 to 5334/Del/2025 C.O. Nos. 221 to 223/Del/2025 DCIT vs. M/s Advant It Park Pvt. Ltd. communication hardware and software, electronic equipment's, office automation, computer stationery/furnitures, diskettes, magnetic tapes and other computer/electrical/electronic related items. 2. To promote, encourage, establish, develop, maintain, organize, undertake, manage, operate, conduct and to run in India or abroad computer training centers, data

UNIVERSAL PRECISION SCREWS,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 1454/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble, Shri G.D.Agrawal & Shri Kuldip Singhi.T.A. No.1454/Del/2015 (Assessment Years 2010-11)

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Goel, CAFor Respondent: None (Sr. DR)
Section 10BSection 24

section 24(b) talks of allowing deduction for the interest payable by the assessee where property has been acquired, constructed, 9 repaired, renewed or reconstructed with borrowed capital. The assessee has admittedly shown some income from let out property under the head 'Income from house property.' Once some term loan has been taken for acquiring or constructing, etc., the property

ACIT (LTU), NEW DELHI vs. MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1768/DEL/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2017AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year : 2002-03

For Appellant: Shri M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Amrendra Kumar, CIT, DR

8 4. The appellant craves leave to add to, alter, amend or vary from the above grounds of appeal at or before the time of hearing.” 9. At the outset, Shri M.S. Syali, the ld. Sr. Counsel, moved an application under Rule 27 of Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules 1963, raising the following legal ground:- “That on facts

NIIT TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of Revenue for assessment year 2007-08

ITA 5525/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: 1. That the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in up
Section 14ASection 35D

houses the section like 80-HHC 80-IA.etc. The Parliament was aware of the various restriction and limiting provisions like section 8OA and section 80AB which Was in Chapter VI-A which do not appear in Chapter-III. The fact that even after its recast the relief has be-en retained in Chapter 11/ indicates that the intention of Parliament

NIIT TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of Revenue for assessment year 2007-08

ITA 5524/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: 1. That the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in up
Section 14ASection 35D

houses the section like 80-HHC 80-IA.etc. The Parliament was aware of the various restriction and limiting provisions like section 8OA and section 80AB which Was in Chapter VI-A which do not appear in Chapter-III. The fact that even after its recast the relief has be-en retained in Chapter 11/ indicates that the intention of Parliament

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S NIIT TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of Revenue for assessment year 2007-08

ITA 5491/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: 1. That the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in up
Section 14ASection 35D

houses the section like 80-HHC 80-IA.etc. The Parliament was aware of the various restriction and limiting provisions like section 8OA and section 80AB which Was in Chapter VI-A which do not appear in Chapter-III. The fact that even after its recast the relief has be-en retained in Chapter 11/ indicates that the intention of Parliament

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S NIIT TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of Revenue for assessment year 2007-08

ITA 5492/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: 1. That the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in up
Section 14ASection 35D

houses the section like 80-HHC 80-IA.etc. The Parliament was aware of the various restriction and limiting provisions like section 8OA and section 80AB which Was in Chapter VI-A which do not appear in Chapter-III. The fact that even after its recast the relief has be-en retained in Chapter 11/ indicates that the intention of Parliament

HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed as indicated above

ITA 5465/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 10ASection 143Section 144Section 144C(13)

House ltd.: ITA No. 4135/Del/2013 (Del.) DCIT v. Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd.: 155 ITD 701 Coil Company (P.) Ltd v ACIT: 65 SOT 27 (Delhi - Trib.) DCIT v Mentor Graphics, (Noida) (P.) Ltd: IT Appeal No. 2634 (DELHI) OF 2011 (Delhi Trib) ITO v Cryobanks International (I) (P.) Ltd.: 151 ITD 552 (Delhi - Trib.) Casio India Co. (P.) Ltd v DCIT

HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed as indicated above

ITA 5624/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Apr 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 10ASection 143Section 144Section 144C(13)

House ltd.: ITA No. 4135/Del/2013 (Del.) DCIT v. Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd.: 155 ITD 701 Coil Company (P.) Ltd v ACIT: 65 SOT 27 (Delhi - Trib.) DCIT v Mentor Graphics, (Noida) (P.) Ltd: IT Appeal No. 2634 (DELHI) OF 2011 (Delhi Trib) ITO v Cryobanks International (I) (P.) Ltd.: 151 ITD 552 (Delhi - Trib.) Casio India Co. (P.) Ltd v DCIT

IMSI INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2506/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Jm Ita No. 5856/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 4277/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Ita No. 5744/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 2506/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Imsi India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy/Assistant Commissioner C/O Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, Of Income Tax, Circle-2, 103, Ashoka Estate, Barakhamba Dehradun, Uttranchal Road, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabci1797A Assessee By : Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Sh. Sudhindra Jain & Sh. Alok Kumar Jain, Cas Revenue By : Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 15.09.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.10.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Appeal By The Assessee For The Assessment Year 2007- 08 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 03.10.2011 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Ii, Dehradun & The Other Appeals Of The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 09.02.2012, 20.12.2011 & 30.11.2012 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Dehradun For The Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Respectively. 2. Since The Issue Involved Is Common In All These Appeals Which Were Heard Together So These Are Being Disposed Off By This Consolidated Order For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity.

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Sh. Sudhindra JainFor Respondent: Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. DR
Section 2Section 234BSection 80Section 80I

house property because a mere 10% of the total space was seen to be utilized for its own use by the assessee. The ld. CIT(A) mentioned that the investments should have been linked directly to eligible business activities for the purposes of Section 80IC of the Act and not for earning revenues otherwise. The ld. CIT(A) held that

IMSI INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5856/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Oct 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Jm Ita No. 5856/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Ita No. 4277/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Ita No. 5744/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 2506/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Imsi India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy/Assistant Commissioner C/O Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, Of Income Tax, Circle-2, 103, Ashoka Estate, Barakhamba Dehradun, Uttranchal Road, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabci1797A Assessee By : Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Sh. Sudhindra Jain & Sh. Alok Kumar Jain, Cas Revenue By : Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 15.09.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.10.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Appeal By The Assessee For The Assessment Year 2007- 08 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 03.10.2011 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Ii, Dehradun & The Other Appeals Of The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 09.02.2012, 20.12.2011 & 30.11.2012 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Dehradun For The Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 Respectively. 2. Since The Issue Involved Is Common In All These Appeals Which Were Heard Together So These Are Being Disposed Off By This Consolidated Order For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity.

For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kumar, Sh. Sudhindra JainFor Respondent: Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. DR
Section 2Section 234BSection 80Section 80I

house property because a mere 10% of the total space was seen to be utilized for its own use by the assessee. The ld. CIT(A) mentioned that the investments should have been linked directly to eligible business activities for the purposes of Section 80IC of the Act and not for earning revenues otherwise. The ld. CIT(A) held that

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I NOIDA, NOIDA vs. M/S ADVANT IT PARK PRIVATE LIMITED , DELHI

Appeal is allowed and order of the High Court is set aside

ITA 5334/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 143(3)

8 ITA Nos. 5332 to 5334/Del/2025 C.O. Nos. 221 to 223/Del/2025 DCIT vs. M/s Advant It Park Pvt. Ltd. communication, and any other services required by the occupants." 12. It is further observed that gross receipts of the assessee as appearing in the Profit & Loss account includes the following: (i) Maintenance income (ii) Lease Rent (iii) Profit of sale

GREAT EASTERN EXPORTS vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/267/2008HC Delhi29 Nov 2010

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

Section 80Section 80HSection 80I

10B or section 10BA or in any provisions of this Chapter under the heading “C-Deductions in respect of certain incomes”, where any goods or services held for the purposes of the undertaking or unit or enterprise or eligible business are transferred to any other business carried on by the assessee or where any goods or services held

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/1223/2011HC Delhi20 Nov 2011
Section 10ASection 260A

8 of the Oxford Dictionary, at page 1422, the two meaning are given as follows: "To 2011:DHC:5847-DB ITA 1223/2011, 67/2010 and 458/2010 Page 12 bring forth, bring into being or existence (a) generally to bring (a thing) into existence from its raw materials or elements or as the result of a process" and " (d) To compose

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. SMT. DEEPTI AGARWAL, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed and Cross objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3609/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishidcit, Vs. Deepti Agarwal, Circle-31(1), Room No. 1405, Prop M/S. Superior Fabrics, 14Th Floor, E-2, Block, Maharaja Lane, Civil Lines, Prataykshkar Bhawan, Dr. New Delhi Shyama Prasad, Mukherjee Civc Pan: Aampa0573C Centre, Jn Nehru Marg, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Ashima Neb, Sr. DR
Section 145(3)Section 40Section 80I

10B, in relation to the profits and gains of the undertaking or enterprise. (6) Not Withstanding anything contained in this Act, no deduction shall be allowed to any undertaking or enterprise under this section, where the total period of deduction inclusive of the period of deduction under this section, or under the second proviso to sub-section (4) of section