BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

169 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80P(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai884Bangalore655Pune410Cochin339Chennai275Delhi169Panaji158Kolkata150Ahmedabad142Surat90Visakhapatnam90Nagpur85Raipur80Rajkot66Jaipur64Hyderabad61Chandigarh57Lucknow44Indore41Karnataka23Amritsar18Jodhpur16Jabalpur14Varanasi10Telangana7Kerala7SC4Ranchi4Allahabad2Agra2Patna2Dehradun2Cuttack2Calcutta2Guwahati1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 80P123Section 14A99Deduction78Section 80P(2)(a)77Disallowance65Addition to Income52Section 143(3)42Section 80P(2)(d)40Section 8033Exemption

MUZAFFARNAGAR DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,MUZAFFARNAGAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1 , MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

ITA 1708/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Delhi05 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganeshita No. 1708/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 Muzaffarnagar District Cooperative Vs Dcit, Bank Ltd., C/O Anil Deep & Company, Circle-1, 41/85, Sadar Bazar, Muzaffarnagar, Muzaffarnagar Uttar Pradesh-251001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaam4327P Assessee By : Sh. Sanjay Malik, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 02.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 05.12.2024 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara: This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2015-16, Arises Against The Order Of Cit(A), Muzaffarnagar Dated 16.01.2018 In Case No. 9258-7434-250-717, In Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”).

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjay Malik, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 5Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(4)

Showing 1–20 of 169 · Page 1 of 9

...
33
Section 26327
Section 80I26

4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the vehement rival submissions against and in support of correctness of impugned section 80P disallowance

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, HISAR vs. SYNERGY WASTE MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, HISAR

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 3557/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahmanita No. 3557/Del/2023 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Dcit, Vs Synergy Waste Management Pvt. Circle, Ltd., #168, Sector-27-28, Hisar, Hisar, Haryana-125001 Haryana-125001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaics9088H Assessee By : Sh. S. K. Gupta, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Sahil Kumar Bansal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.12.2024 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara: This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2017-18, Arises Against The Cit(A)/Nfac, Delhi’S Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/105727025(1) Dated 20.10.2023, In Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”).

For Appellant: Sh. S. K. Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Sahil Kumar Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 4Section 801A(4)Section 80I

4); the six deductions as referred to in section 80AC must necessarily be claimed in the return filed u/s 139(1) only. Ex consequenti, the contention that since section 80P is not covered under section 80AC, the deduction under this section becomes automatically allowable without adhering to the requirement of section 80A(5), is bereft of force and hence dismissed

THE MANTOLA COOPERATIVE THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-62(5), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6935/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 4078/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 6935/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 2036/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 The Mantola Cooperative Vs Income Tax Officer, Thrift & Credit Society Ltd., Ward-62(5), 541, Mantola, Phar Ganj, New Delhi New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaajt1976A Assessee By : Sh. Gaurav Jain, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.06.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.07.2020

For Appellant: Sh. Gaurav Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction under section 80P and dismissing the ground raised by the appellant, despite holding in para 6.1.8 that the interest received from deposits made with co- operative banks/societies is eligible for deduction under section 80P (sic section 80P(2)(d)) of the Act.” ITA Nos. 2036 & 4078/Del/2019 4

THE MANTOLA COOPERATIVE THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-62(5), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2036/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 4078/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 6935/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 2036/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 The Mantola Cooperative Vs Income Tax Officer, Thrift & Credit Society Ltd., Ward-62(5), 541, Mantola, Phar Ganj, New Delhi New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaajt1976A Assessee By : Sh. Gaurav Jain, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.06.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.07.2020

For Appellant: Sh. Gaurav Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction under section 80P and dismissing the ground raised by the appellant, despite holding in para 6.1.8 that the interest received from deposits made with co- operative banks/societies is eligible for deduction under section 80P (sic section 80P(2)(d)) of the Act.” ITA Nos. 2036 & 4078/Del/2019 4

MANTOLA COOPERATIVE THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-62(5), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4078/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 4078/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 6935/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 2036/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 The Mantola Cooperative Vs Income Tax Officer, Thrift & Credit Society Ltd., Ward-62(5), 541, Mantola, Phar Ganj, New Delhi New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaajt1976A Assessee By : Sh. Gaurav Jain, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 22.06.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.07.2020

For Appellant: Sh. Gaurav Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction under section 80P and dismissing the ground raised by the appellant, despite holding in para 6.1.8 that the interest received from deposits made with co- operative banks/societies is eligible for deduction under section 80P (sic section 80P(2)(d)) of the Act.” ITA Nos. 2036 & 4078/Del/2019 4

ITO, WARD- 63(5), NEW DELHI vs. THE JWALA COOPERATIVE URBAN THRIFT AND CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5623/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 5623/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Income Tax Officer, Vs The Jwala Cooperative Urban Ward-63(5), Thrift & Credit Society Ltd., New Delhi-110002 218, Dda Cycle Market, Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi-110055 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabat0924C Assessee By : Ms. Gunjan Jain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Ratan Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.10.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.01.2022

For Appellant: Ms. Gunjan Jain, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Ratan Singh, Sr. DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) being interest on FDR amounting to Rs.1,34,65,081/- and S.B. interest of Rs.22,163/- by treating them as income from other sources. The assessee took the plea that income of the assessee from Bombay Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd., is exempt under section 80P

SAHAKARI GANNA VIKAS SAMITI,UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO-2(5) CHANDAUSI, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2090/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Pradip Kumar Kediasahakari Ganna Vikas Vs. Ito-2(5), Samiti, Sikri Gate Chandausi Chandausi, Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh-244 412 Pan No. Aaaaf 1459 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, Adv. Revenue By Shri Anuj Garg, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 19.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.07.2023

Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(1)(v)Section 154Section 80ASection 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed under any of the provisions of Chapter VI-A under the heading "C.—Deductions in respect of certain incomes" (which includes deduction under section 80P of the Act), can be made if the return is furnished beyond the due date specified under sub-section (1) of section 139. This amendment has been introduced w.e.f

THE MANTOLA COOPERATIVE THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 483/DEL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri S. V. Mehrotra & Smt. Beena A. Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri M K Jain, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 148Section 57Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(i)Section 80p

disallowance under section 80P to interest income of Rs.63,74,470, being the amount of interest received from commercial banks, in view of the provisions of Section 80P(2)( d) of the Act, under which interest received from cooperative banks was admittedly allowable. 4

BSC C&C JV,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-62(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 4546/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshm/S. Bsc C&C Joint Venture, Vs. Acit, 74, Hemkunt Colony, Circle-62(1), New Delhi-110048 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aadfb8115G Assessee By : Shri Rohit Jain, Adv Shri Deepesh Jain, Adv Revenue By: Shri Jitender Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 05/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 20/08/2025

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Jitender Singh, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80I

disallowances . The assessee preferred an appeal before the Learned CITA. Before the Learned CITA, an additional ground was raised by the assessee with respect to claim of deduction under section 80 IA(4)(i) of the Act. The assessee also furnished additional evidences under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules in support of the claim of deduction under section

DCIT, HISAR vs. M/S SYNERGY WASTE MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.,, HISAR

In the result, all the five captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 5702/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri Ramesh Goyal, CA &For Respondent: Ms Kajal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 119Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 170Section 170(1)Section 44ASection 801ASection 80I

4); the six deductions as referred to in section 80AC must necessarily be claimed in the return filed u/s 139(1) only. Ex consequenti, the contention that since section 80P is not covered under section 80AC, the deduction under this section becomes automatically allowable without adhering to the requirement of section 80A(5), is bereft of force and hence dismissed

DCIT, HISAR vs. M/S SYNERGY WASTE MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.,, HISAR

In the result, all the five captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 5701/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Feb 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri Ramesh Goyal, CA &For Respondent: Ms Kajal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 119Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 170Section 170(1)Section 44ASection 801ASection 80I

4); the six deductions as referred to in section 80AC must necessarily be claimed in the return filed u/s 139(1) only. Ex consequenti, the contention that since section 80P is not covered under section 80AC, the deduction under this section becomes automatically allowable without adhering to the requirement of section 80A(5), is bereft of force and hence dismissed

DCIT, HISAR vs. M/S SYNERGY WASTE MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.,, HISAR

In the result, all the five captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 5704/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri Ramesh Goyal, CA &For Respondent: Ms Kajal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 119Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 170Section 170(1)Section 44ASection 801ASection 80I

4); the six deductions as referred to in section 80AC must necessarily be claimed in the return filed u/s 139(1) only. Ex consequenti, the contention that since section 80P is not covered under section 80AC, the deduction under this section becomes automatically allowable without adhering to the requirement of section 80A(5), is bereft of force and hence dismissed

DCIT, HISAR vs. M/S SYNERGY WASTE MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.,, HISAR

In the result, all the five captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 5703/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri Ramesh Goyal, CA &For Respondent: Ms Kajal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 119Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 170Section 170(1)Section 44ASection 801ASection 80I

4); the six deductions as referred to in section 80AC must necessarily be claimed in the return filed u/s 139(1) only. Ex consequenti, the contention that since section 80P is not covered under section 80AC, the deduction under this section becomes automatically allowable without adhering to the requirement of section 80A(5), is bereft of force and hence dismissed

THE VEER CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 39(4), NEW DELHI

In the result, ITA.No.2787/Del

ITA 2788/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Ms. Mansi JainFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Jiwani, Sr. D.R
Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

4 ITA.Nos.2787 & 2788/Del./2018 M/s. The Veer Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited, New Delhi. earned from third party i.e, from Bank on deposits of FDRs. The A.O. referred to Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Bangalore Club vs. CIT (2013) 212 Taxman 566 in which it was held that interest income earned

THYE VEER CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-39(4), NEW DELHI

In the result, ITA.No.2787/Del

ITA 2787/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Sept 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Ms. Mansi JainFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Jiwani, Sr. D.R
Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

4 ITA.Nos.2787 & 2788/Del./2018 M/s. The Veer Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited, New Delhi. earned from third party i.e, from Bank on deposits of FDRs. The A.O. referred to Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Bangalore Club vs. CIT (2013) 212 Taxman 566 in which it was held that interest income earned

THE JANTA ADARSH CO-OPERATIVE THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,DELHI vs. ITO WARD-52(1), DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3692/DEL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat

Section 2(19)Section 234BSection 234CSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved against this, the assessee preferred appeal before Ld.CIT(A) who after considering the submissions, sustained this addition and dismissed the appeal of the assessee on this issue. 5. Aggrieved against the order of Ld.CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 6. The assessee

JANTA ADARSH CO-OPERATIVE THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO,WARD-52(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3693/DEL/2023[2020-21]Status: HeardITAT Delhi28 Jun 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat

Section 2(19)Section 234BSection 234CSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved against this, the assessee preferred appeal before Ld.CIT(A) who after considering the submissions, sustained this addition and dismissed the appeal of the assessee on this issue. 5. Aggrieved against the order of Ld.CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 6. The assessee

NTT DATA GLOBAL DELIVERY SERVICES LTD.,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 5196/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishintt Data Global Delivery Vs. Dcit, Services Ltd, Circle-13(1), No. 17, South End Road, New Delhi Bangalore Pan: Aabck7777J (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Purushottam, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Amit Katoch, CIT DR
Section 10Section 10ASection 143

disallowance of deduction under section 10 A, is required to be made on other income and miscellaneous income of the assessee. Accordingly, he held that INR 24 4340 5880/– is other income, though it can be assessed as the business income of the assessee. However same cannot be said to be the income derived from export-oriented undertaking. Therefore

CANADIAN SPECIALITY VINYLS,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 63(4), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7612/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & M.Balaganeshassessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Canadian Specialty Vinyls Ito Ward-63(4), Delhi 110055 49, Rani Janshi Road, Jhandewalan, New Delhi 110055 Vs. Pan Aagfc 0200 J

For Appellant: Shri Shaantanu Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Maimum Alam, Sr. DR
Section 2Section 801CSection 80I

4); the six deductions as referred to in section 80AC must necessarily be claimed in the return filed u/s 139(1) only. Ex consequenti, the contention that since section 80P is not covered under section 80AC, the deduction under this section becomes automatically allowable without adhering to the requirement of section 80A(5), is bereft of force and hence dismissed

MUFG BANK LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE-2(2)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7895/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing) Mufg Bank Ltd, Vs. Acit (International Taxation), 5Th Floor, Worldmark 2, Asset 8, Circle-2(2)(1), Aerocity, Nh-8, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aabct3880D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Nishant Thakkar, AdvFor Respondent: Shr Surender Pal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 244ASection 37(1)Section 44C

Disallowance made under Rule – 8D(2)(ii) is bad as the assessee had enough interest free funds available. Each of the aforesaid contention is explained in detail below. Section 14A is not applicable in case of bank when the investments are held as stock-in-trade: It is submitted that the investment in PTCs is made by the assessee