BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

119 results for “disallowance”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi119Jaipur77Mumbai51Chandigarh43Bangalore37Chennai30Hyderabad27Indore17Rajkot16Kolkata15Surat14Pune14Agra14Ahmedabad10Raipur7Visakhapatnam5Cuttack4Jodhpur2Amritsar2Cochin2Lucknow1Allahabad1Jabalpur1SC1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 153A109Addition to Income76Disallowance54Section 69B52Bogus Purchases37Unexplained Investment36Section 143(3)31Section 6831Section 69C27Section 132

HARISH NARANG,PANIPAT vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHTAK, ROHTAK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 3637/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma& Shri Amitabh Shukla[Assessment Year: 2018-19] Harish Narang, The Principal Commissioner Of H. No.238, Ward No.8, Income Tax, Rohtak, Panipat, Haryana-132103 Vs Aayakar Bhawan, Opp. Mansarover Park, Rohtak, Haryana-124001 Pan:Acvpn4090J Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Amit Kaushik, Adv. Revenue By Ms. Amisha S. Gupt, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 16.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31.12.2025

Section 144BSection 147Section 263Section 69C

disallowance under section 37(1) of the Act as they were not incurred for business purposes. The ld. PCIT, Rohtak examined the impugned order dated 16.03.2023 of the ld. AO and concluded that since the same was passed without applying the provisions of section 69C of the Act r.w.s. 115 BBE of the Act, the same fell into the category

Showing 1–20 of 119 · Page 1 of 6

17
Section 153C17
Search & Seizure17

DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI vs. BAWA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 352/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya & Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.352/Del/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2017-18 बनाम Dcit Bawa Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Circle 4(2) Vs. A-24, Tagore Market, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi. West, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaacb4823D अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 68

disallowance. In the second paragraph above, the Assessing Officer has alternatively applied Section 69C. Section 69C is also for unexplained expenditure. Admittedly, there is no question of any unexplained expenditure in the case under appeal before us and therefore, Section 69C is also not applicable. I.T.A. No. 352/Del/2021 > Further, we find the stand of the Assessing Officer to be contradictory

J. M. HOUSING LIMITED,DELHI vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL) KNP MEERUT, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 8248/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member [Assessment Year: 2021-22] J.M. Housing Limited, Pr.Cit (Central) Kanpur, At Meerut, 312/3T/F5 Pratap Bhawan, Aayakar Bhawan, Bhainsali Ground, Bhahadur Shah Zafar Marg, Vs Meerut, Uttar Pradesh-25001 Central Delhi, Delhi-11002 Pan-Aaccj1692E Assessee Revenue

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271ASection 68

disallowed u/s 41(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 and should be added to the total income of the assessee under the head of business income by the AO but AO failed to do so….” 4. In view of the foregoing discussed facts, the assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Income

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. R.J. CORP LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 5310/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Rajat Jain, CA&For Respondent: Sh. T. Kipgen, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 45(2)

disallowance-and capital gain on sale of shares I am partly confirming the AO’s action. The additional income resulting from part confirmation of those grounds would also be telescoped into the above stated Rs. 8,24,33,171/- as the same is covered by the narration of the surrendered income.” 25. We find that this

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. R.J. CORP LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 5311/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Rajat Jain, CA&For Respondent: Sh. T. Kipgen, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 45(2)

disallowance-and capital gain on sale of shares I am partly confirming the AO’s action. The additional income resulting from part confirmation of those grounds would also be telescoped into the above stated Rs. 8,24,33,171/- as the same is covered by the narration of the surrendered income.” 25. We find that this

M/S. RJ CORP LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 4971/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Rajat Jain, CA&For Respondent: Sh. T. Kipgen, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 45(2)

disallowance-and capital gain on sale of shares I am partly confirming the AO’s action. The additional income resulting from part confirmation of those grounds would also be telescoped into the above stated Rs. 8,24,33,171/- as the same is covered by the narration of the surrendered income.” 25. We find that this

M/S. RJ CORP LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 4972/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Rajat Jain, CA&For Respondent: Sh. T. Kipgen, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 45(2)

disallowance-and capital gain on sale of shares I am partly confirming the AO’s action. The additional income resulting from part confirmation of those grounds would also be telescoped into the above stated Rs. 8,24,33,171/- as the same is covered by the narration of the surrendered income.” 25. We find that this

NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

ITA 240/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 273/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 308/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 299/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 300/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

ITA 238/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

ITA 239/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 296/DEL/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 305/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 306/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 303/DEL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 295/DEL/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 275/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

69B of the Act, made in AY 2013-14, ITA 232 for AY 2013-14 (appeal of assessee) Issue no. 5 is with regard to Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, in AY 2015-16 onwards to AY 2018-19. The issue is decided in favour of assessee by the CIT(A) and Revenue has filed appeals in case