BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

69 results for “disallowance”+ Section 44Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai98Delhi69Ahmedabad7Dehradun6Kolkata5Hyderabad3Lucknow2Bangalore2SC1Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 44C37Disallowance33Double Taxation/DTAA28Addition to Income27Section 143(3)24Deduction24Section 115J22Permanent Establishment16Section 144C(13)11Depreciation

MUFG BANK LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE-2(2)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7895/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing) Mufg Bank Ltd, Vs. Acit (International Taxation), 5Th Floor, Worldmark 2, Asset 8, Circle-2(2)(1), Aerocity, Nh-8, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aabct3880D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Nishant Thakkar, AdvFor Respondent: Shr Surender Pal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 244ASection 37(1)Section 44C

disallowance is called for under that Section. Accordingly, made by the learned assessing officer u/s 14A of the income tax act of ₹ 22,521,366/– is unwarranted. Further, as the assessee is granted relief on the first argument that Section 14 A is not applicable in case of bank when the investments are held as stock in trade, other arguments

Showing 1–20 of 69 · Page 1 of 4

10
Section 40a9
Section 44D9

CAIRN ENERGY HYDROCARBON LTD. ,GURGAON vs. DCIT, INTL. TAXATION, CIRCLE, GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6277/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 6357/Del/2013: Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Vs Cairn Energy Hydrocarbon Ltd., C/O. Cairn India Ltd., 3Rd & 4Th Circle-3(2), International Taxation, Floor, Vipul Plaza, Suncity, Sector- New Delhi 54, Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccc3279J

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 40aSection 57Section 80I

section 40A and 44C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, shall apply.” 48. The disallowance is called for only where

DCIT, INTL. TAXATION, CIRCLE, GURGAON vs. CAIRN ENERGY HYDROCARBON LTD. , GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 5989/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 6357/Del/2013: Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Vs Cairn Energy Hydrocarbon Ltd., C/O. Cairn India Ltd., 3Rd & 4Th Circle-3(2), International Taxation, Floor, Vipul Plaza, Suncity, Sector- New Delhi 54, Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccc3279J

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 40aSection 57Section 80I

section 40A and 44C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, shall apply.” 48. The disallowance is called for only where

DDIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. CAIRN ENERGY HYDROCARBONS LTD., GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6357/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 6357/Del/2013: Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Vs Cairn Energy Hydrocarbon Ltd., C/O. Cairn India Ltd., 3Rd & 4Th Circle-3(2), International Taxation, Floor, Vipul Plaza, Suncity, Sector- New Delhi 54, Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccc3279J

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 40aSection 57Section 80I

section 40A and 44C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, shall apply.” 48. The disallowance is called for only where

CAIRN ENERGY HYDROCARBON LTD. ,GURGAON vs. DCIT, INTL. TAXATION, CIRCLE, GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6278/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 6357/Del/2013: Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Vs Cairn Energy Hydrocarbon Ltd., C/O. Cairn India Ltd., 3Rd & 4Th Circle-3(2), International Taxation, Floor, Vipul Plaza, Suncity, Sector- New Delhi 54, Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccc3279J

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 40aSection 57Section 80I

section 40A and 44C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, shall apply.” 48. The disallowance is called for only where

CAIRN ENERGY HYDROCARBONS LTD.,GURGAON vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 6346/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 6357/Del/2013: Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Vs Cairn Energy Hydrocarbon Ltd., C/O. Cairn India Ltd., 3Rd & 4Th Circle-3(2), International Taxation, Floor, Vipul Plaza, Suncity, Sector- New Delhi 54, Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccc3279J

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 40aSection 57Section 80I

section 40A and 44C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, shall apply.” 48. The disallowance is called for only where

DCIT, INTL. TAXATION, CIRCLE, GURGAON vs. CAIRN ENERGY HYDROCARBON LTD. , GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 5988/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 6357/Del/2013: Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Dcit, Vs Cairn Energy Hydrocarbon Ltd., C/O. Cairn India Ltd., 3Rd & 4Th Circle-3(2), International Taxation, Floor, Vipul Plaza, Suncity, Sector- New Delhi 54, Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccc3279J

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 40aSection 57Section 80I

section 40A and 44C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, shall apply.” 48. The disallowance is called for only where

ERNST & YOUNG LTD., INDIA BRANCH OFFICE,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 6562/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Abhimanyu Jhamba, AdvFor Respondent: Shri G. K. Dhall, CIT-DR
Section 144C(13)Section 44C

section 44C is a specific allowance available to non-resident assessees for executive and general administration expenditure incurred by the head office outside India but attributable to the India BO subject to the S. 44C ceiling limit @ 5% of the adjusted total. The AO has thus correctly disallowed

ERNST & YOUNG LTD., INDIA BRANCH OFFICE,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 6561/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Abhimanyu Jhamba, AdvFor Respondent: Shri G. K. Dhall, CIT-DR
Section 144C(13)Section 44C

section 44C is a specific allowance available to non-resident assessees for executive and general administration expenditure incurred by the head office outside India but attributable to the India BO subject to the S. 44C ceiling limit @ 5% of the adjusted total. The AO has thus correctly disallowed

M/S. BG EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LTD.,MUMBAI vs. JCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 1478/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Jul 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year : 2011-12 Bg Exploration & Production India Jcit (International Taxation), Ltd., Dehradun. Lake Boulevard Road, Vs. Hiranandani Business Park, Powai, Mumbai.

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr.Adv
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 153Section 153(4)Section 92C

44C with respect to the returned income and not income assessed. Ground No. 13: Disallowance of depreciation on Panna-Mukta Well Cost 5 13.1 The learned AO / DRP erred in law and in facts in disallowing a sum of Rs.26,57,46,314 by considering depreciation rate of 15% on the Panna-Mukta Well Cost as per section

CAIRN ENERGY HYDROCARBON LTD. ,GURGAON vs. JCIT,(OSD) INTL. TAXATION, CIRCLE, GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals preferred by the assessee as well as the Revenue

ITA 9492/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri M. Balaganesh[A.Y.: 2015-16] & [A.Y.: 2016-17]

Section 32Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(iia)Section 40a

section 44C and has simply disallowed these expenses on the basis of the stand taken by the Assessing Officer in earlier

DCIT, INT. TAX. CIRCLE, GURGAON vs. CAIRN ENERGY HYDROCARBONS LIMITED, GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals preferred by the assessee as well as the Revenue

ITA 8983/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri M. Balaganesh[A.Y.: 2015-16] & [A.Y.: 2016-17]

Section 32Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(iia)Section 40a

section 44C and has simply disallowed these expenses on the basis of the stand taken by the Assessing Officer in earlier

ERNST & YOUNG LTD., INDIA BRANCH OFFICE,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE- 1(2)(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed partly for statistical purposes

ITA 6935/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Ernst & Young Ltd., Vs. Acit (International India Branch Office, Taxation), Office No. 7, 1St Floor, Atma Circle-1(2)(2), New Delhi Ram Mansion, Scindia House, Kg Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi Pan :Aabce9897M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Abhimanyu Jhamba, Adv & Ms. Hemlata Ranga, Adv. Respondent By Ms. Ashima Neb, Sr.Dr

Section 271Section 44C

disallowance of Rs.20,95,149/-under section 44C of the Act and addition of Rs.5,42,798/- as markup on expenses

M/S CHINA TRUST COMMERCIAL BANK,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, NEW DELHI

In the result ground No. 3

ITA 1257/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: PendingITAT Delhi26 Dec 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Prashant Maharishichina Trust Commercial Bank, Vs. Adit, A-1/16, Wenger House, Circle-1(1), Connaught Place, New Delhi International Taxation, Pan:Aaacc4000B New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri KVS Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Shri TM Shiva Kumar, CIT DR
Section 115Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 44C

44C of the act was disallowed by the ld Assessing Officer. Assessee submitted that Head Office has incurred various executives and general administrative expenditure for its office in India in the form of stationary, allocation of various general management and administrative expenses and training expenses. It was stated that such expenses are borne by the HO and attributable

M/S. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1162/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 May 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, V.P. & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, A.M. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 1162/Del/2014 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" The Bank Of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ufj Ltd., Jeevan Vihar Building, 3, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110001. .............अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan-Aabct3880D Vs The Ddit (International Taxation), Circle-1(1), …………. ""यथ" / Respondent New Delhi अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By: Sh. Percy Pardiwala, Sr.Adv & Sh. Hiteh Chande, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By: Sh. H.K.Choudhary, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Sh. Percy Pardiwala, Sr.Adv &For Respondent: Sh. H.K.Choudhary, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 44CSection 9(1)(v)

disallowed sum of Rs.9,92,36,315/- in Assessment Year 2007-08, which was incurred on account of overseas salaries paid to expatriates being in nature of head office expenses and could not be allowed as a deduction as per the provisions of section 44C

TRAVELPORT INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS LIMITED,BERKSHIRE vs. ACIT CIRCLE-3(1)(1),INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 1566/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Dey

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

disallowance for non-deduction of taxes cannot be made u/s 40(a)(i) 8.3 That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and without prejudice to the Appellant's claim of full deduction of distribution fees, the Ld. AO and the Ld. DRP has erred in not allowing deduction of 70% as per section

TRAVELPORT INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS LIMITED ,BERKSHIRE vs. ACIT CIRCLE-3(1)(1) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 1567/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Jan 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Dey

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

disallowance for non-deduction of taxes cannot be made u/s 40(a)(i) 8.3 That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and without prejudice to the Appellant's claim of full deduction of distribution fees, the Ld. AO and the Ld. DRP has erred in not allowing deduction of 70% as per section

TRAVELPORT INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS LIMITED,BERKSHIRE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), INT. TAX-3, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 9711/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Ajit Kumar Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Anupama Anand, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 154Section 40Section 40a

disallowance on other expenses @ 30%.” Following the decisions (supra) we hold and order accordingly. 15. Ground No. 8 relates to allowability of head office expenses under section 44C

STANDARD CHARTERED GRINDLAYS BANK,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2920/DEL/2008[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Oct 2020AY 2001-2002

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowladr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Coferencing)

For Appellant: Sh. Shashi M. Kapila, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Satpal Gulati, CIT DR
Section 10(33)Section 115Section 115A(3)Section 195(1)Section 3Section 36(1)(viia)Section 40

section 44C has already been allowed. The AO placed reliance on the judgment of the Calcutta High Court in the case of UCO Bank Vs. CIT, 200 ITR. 5. The ld. CIT (A) directed to re-compute the disallowance

M/S. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, UFJ LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 3707/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 115JSection 44CSection 90

disallowance of provision written back for wealth tax while computing book profits under Section 115JB, interest paid to HO/Overseas Branches by Indian PE and received by Indian PE from HO/Overseas branches and allowance of deduction under Section 44C