DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. HLS ASIA LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh

disallowing the deduction not claimed would not arise.” 28 ITA No.1712/Del./2010 ITA No.4144/Del./2014 ITA No.2208/Del./2014 ITA No.3708/Del./2012 ITA No.5511/Del./2012 ITA No.323/Del./2012 ITA No.5855/Del./2011 ITA No.2241/Del./2014 28. So, in view of the matter, we are of the considered view that ld. CIT (A) has rightly deleted the addition of Rs.51,43,856/- made

HLS ASIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh

disallowing the deduction not claimed would not arise.” 28 ITA No.1712/Del./2010 ITA No.4144/Del./2014 ITA No.2208/Del./2014 ITA No.3708/Del./2012 ITA No.5511/Del./2012 ITA No.323/Del./2012 ITA No.5855/Del./2011 ITA No.2241/Del./2014 28. So, in view of the matter, we are of the considered view that ld. CIT (A) has rightly deleted the addition of Rs.51,43,856/- made

M/S. HLS ASIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh

disallowing the deduction not claimed would not arise.” 28 ITA No.1712/Del./2010 ITA No.4144/Del./2014 ITA No.2208/Del./2014 ITA No.3708/Del./2012 ITA No.5511/Del./2012 ITA No.323/Del./2012 ITA No.5855/Del./2011 ITA No.2241/Del./2014 28. So, in view of the matter, we are of the considered view that ld. CIT (A) has rightly deleted the addition of Rs.51,43,856/- made

HLS ASIA LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. CIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh

disallowing the deduction not claimed would not arise.” 28 ITA No.1712/Del./2010 ITA No.4144/Del./2014 ITA No.2208/Del./2014 ITA No.3708/Del./2012 ITA No.5511/Del./2012 ITA No.323/Del./2012 ITA No.5855/Del./2011 ITA No.2241/Del./2014 28. So, in view of the matter, we are of the considered view that ld. CIT (A) has rightly deleted the addition of Rs.51,43,856/- made

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. HLS ASIA LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh

disallowing the deduction not claimed would not arise.” 28 ITA No.1712/Del./2010 ITA No.4144/Del./2014 ITA No.2208/Del./2014 ITA No.3708/Del./2012 ITA No.5511/Del./2012 ITA No.323/Del./2012 ITA No.5855/Del./2011 ITA No.2241/Del./2014 28. So, in view of the matter, we are of the considered view that ld. CIT (A) has rightly deleted the addition of Rs.51,43,856/- made

HLS ASIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. CIT- IV, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh

disallowing the deduction not claimed would not arise.” 28 ITA No.1712/Del./2010 ITA No.4144/Del./2014 ITA No.2208/Del./2014 ITA No.3708/Del./2012 ITA No.5511/Del./2012 ITA No.323/Del./2012 ITA No.5855/Del./2011 ITA No.2241/Del./2014 28. So, in view of the matter, we are of the considered view that ld. CIT (A) has rightly deleted the addition of Rs.51,43,856/- made

M/S. KRISHAK BHARTI COOPERATIVE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kul Bharat

disallowance u/s 14A. 3.2.6 Further, Ld. AR has relied upon the judicial pronouncement of the jurisdictional Delhi High Court in the appellant's own case pertaining to A.Y. 2006-07 in ITA No.444/2011 decided on 18/07/2012 relating dividend income of RS.15,011 /- from NAFED, which is included in the total income and only deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) has been

ACIT,, NEW DELHI vs. M/S KRISHAK BHARATI COOPERATIVE LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kul Bharat

disallowance u/s 14A. 3.2.6 Further, Ld. AR has relied upon the judicial pronouncement of the jurisdictional Delhi High Court in the appellant's own case pertaining to A.Y. 2006-07 in ITA No.444/2011 decided on 18/07/2012 relating dividend income of RS.15,011 /- from NAFED, which is included in the total income and only deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) has been

M/S. KRISHAK BHARTI COOPERATIVE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kul Bharat

disallowance u/s 14A. 3.2.6 Further, Ld. AR has relied upon the judicial pronouncement of the jurisdictional Delhi High Court in the appellant's own case pertaining to A.Y. 2006-07 in ITA No.444/2011 decided on 18/07/2012 relating dividend income of RS.15,011 /- from NAFED, which is included in the total income and only deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) has been

ACIT,, NEW DELHI vs. M/S KRISHAK BHARATI COOPERATIVE LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kul Bharat

disallowance u/s 14A. 3.2.6 Further, Ld. AR has relied upon the judicial pronouncement of the jurisdictional Delhi High Court in the appellant's own case pertaining to A.Y. 2006-07 in ITA No.444/2011 decided on 18/07/2012 relating dividend income of RS.15,011 /- from NAFED, which is included in the total income and only deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) has been

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. JET LITE (INDIA) LTD.

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

disallowed under Section 35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

disallowed under Section 35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

disallowed under Section 35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

disallowed under Section 35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

disallowed under Section 35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

disallowed under Section 35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

disallowed under Section 35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

disallowed under Section 35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following