INFO EDGE (INDIA) LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

INFO EDGE (INDIA) LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

INFO EDGE (INDIA) LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

DCIT CIRCLE-10(1), C.R. BUILDING vs. INFO EDGE (INDIA) LTD., NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), NEW DELHI, C.R. BUILDING vs. INFO EDGE (INDIA) LTD., NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

PRABODH SHARMA, DY. CIT10(1), NEW DELHI, C. R. BUILDING vs. INFO EDGE (INDIA) LTD., NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

INFO EDGE (INDIA) LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), NEW DELHI, C.R. BUILDING vs. INFO EDGE (INDIA) LTD., NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

DCIT, CIRCLE 10(1), NEW DELHI, C. R. BUILDING vs. INFO EDGE (INDIA) LTD., NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), NEW DELHI, C.R. BUILDING vs. INFO EDGE (INDIA) LTD., NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

INFO EDGE (INDIA) LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

disallowance made by the assessee is thus not sustainable in law. 4.7 Ground No.1 of the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 5. Second issue relates to short credit of TDS granted by the AO. 5.1 It is pointed out on behalf of the assessee that the Assessing Officer, while framing the assessment order, has granted TDS credits of Rs.25

C & S ELECTRIC LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, LTU, NEW DELHI

In the result, the revenue’s appeal stands dismissed as above

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No. 2622/Del/2018, A.Y. 2013-14 Ita No. 2623/Del/2018, A.Y. 2014-15 Ita No. 7981/Del/2018, A.Y. 2015-16 C & S Electric Limited Deputy Commissioner Of 222, Okhla Industrial Estate Income Tax, Phase-Iii, New Delhi Vs. Circle-1, Ltu, New Delhi Pan: Aaacc0909K (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita No. 2532/Del/2018, A.Y.2013-14 Ita No. 2533/Del/2018, A.Y.2014-15 Ita No. 8274/Del/2018, A.Y.2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of C & S Electric Limited Income Tax, (Formerly Controls & Circle-1, Ltu, Vs. Switchgear Co. Ltd.) New Delhi 222, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase-Iii, New Delhi Pan: Aaacc0909K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Anil Bhalla, Ca Respondent By Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/06/2025 Order Per Bench Cross Appeal By The Assessee & Revenue Containing Common Facts Were Heard Together Being Inter-Connected With Each Other & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order. Ita No.2532, 2533 & 8274/Del/2018 C & S Electric Ltd. 2. These Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Are Directed Against Orders Dated 10.01.18 & 25.09.2018 Respectively Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, New Delhi [‘Cit(A)’].

199/- on account of excess claim u/s 80IC in relation to transfer from non 80IC units to 80IC units as disallowed by the A.O. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing a relief of Rs.74,95,918/- made by A.O. while determining the adjustment on account

DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, LTU, NEW DELHI vs. C & S ELECTRIC LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the revenue’s appeal stands dismissed as above

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No. 2622/Del/2018, A.Y. 2013-14 Ita No. 2623/Del/2018, A.Y. 2014-15 Ita No. 7981/Del/2018, A.Y. 2015-16 C & S Electric Limited Deputy Commissioner Of 222, Okhla Industrial Estate Income Tax, Phase-Iii, New Delhi Vs. Circle-1, Ltu, New Delhi Pan: Aaacc0909K (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita No. 2532/Del/2018, A.Y.2013-14 Ita No. 2533/Del/2018, A.Y.2014-15 Ita No. 8274/Del/2018, A.Y.2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of C & S Electric Limited Income Tax, (Formerly Controls & Circle-1, Ltu, Vs. Switchgear Co. Ltd.) New Delhi 222, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase-Iii, New Delhi Pan: Aaacc0909K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Anil Bhalla, Ca Respondent By Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/06/2025 Order Per Bench Cross Appeal By The Assessee & Revenue Containing Common Facts Were Heard Together Being Inter-Connected With Each Other & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order. Ita No.2532, 2533 & 8274/Del/2018 C & S Electric Ltd. 2. These Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Are Directed Against Orders Dated 10.01.18 & 25.09.2018 Respectively Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, New Delhi [‘Cit(A)’].

199/- on account of excess claim u/s 80IC in relation to transfer from non 80IC units to 80IC units as disallowed by the A.O. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing a relief of Rs.74,95,918/- made by A.O. while determining the adjustment on account

ACIT, CIRCLE- 1, LTU, NEW DELHI vs. C&S ELECTRIC LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the revenue’s appeal stands dismissed as above

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No. 2622/Del/2018, A.Y. 2013-14 Ita No. 2623/Del/2018, A.Y. 2014-15 Ita No. 7981/Del/2018, A.Y. 2015-16 C & S Electric Limited Deputy Commissioner Of 222, Okhla Industrial Estate Income Tax, Phase-Iii, New Delhi Vs. Circle-1, Ltu, New Delhi Pan: Aaacc0909K (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita No. 2532/Del/2018, A.Y.2013-14 Ita No. 2533/Del/2018, A.Y.2014-15 Ita No. 8274/Del/2018, A.Y.2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of C & S Electric Limited Income Tax, (Formerly Controls & Circle-1, Ltu, Vs. Switchgear Co. Ltd.) New Delhi 222, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase-Iii, New Delhi Pan: Aaacc0909K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Anil Bhalla, Ca Respondent By Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/06/2025 Order Per Bench Cross Appeal By The Assessee & Revenue Containing Common Facts Were Heard Together Being Inter-Connected With Each Other & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order. Ita No.2532, 2533 & 8274/Del/2018 C & S Electric Ltd. 2. These Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Are Directed Against Orders Dated 10.01.18 & 25.09.2018 Respectively Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, New Delhi [‘Cit(A)’].

199/- on account of excess claim u/s 80IC in relation to transfer from non 80IC units to 80IC units as disallowed by the A.O. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing a relief of Rs.74,95,918/- made by A.O. while determining the adjustment on account

ITO WARD - 10(4), NEW DELHI vs. GHP BUILDCON PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the revenue’s appeal stands dismissed as above

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No. 2622/Del/2018, A.Y. 2013-14 Ita No. 2623/Del/2018, A.Y. 2014-15 Ita No. 7981/Del/2018, A.Y. 2015-16 C & S Electric Limited Deputy Commissioner Of 222, Okhla Industrial Estate Income Tax, Phase-Iii, New Delhi Vs. Circle-1, Ltu, New Delhi Pan: Aaacc0909K (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita No. 2532/Del/2018, A.Y.2013-14 Ita No. 2533/Del/2018, A.Y.2014-15 Ita No. 8274/Del/2018, A.Y.2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of C & S Electric Limited Income Tax, (Formerly Controls & Circle-1, Ltu, Vs. Switchgear Co. Ltd.) New Delhi 222, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase-Iii, New Delhi Pan: Aaacc0909K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Anil Bhalla, Ca Respondent By Sh. Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/06/2025 Order Per Bench Cross Appeal By The Assessee & Revenue Containing Common Facts Were Heard Together Being Inter-Connected With Each Other & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order. Ita No.2532, 2533 & 8274/Del/2018 C & S Electric Ltd. 2. These Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Are Directed Against Orders Dated 10.01.18 & 25.09.2018 Respectively Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, New Delhi [‘Cit(A)’].

199/- on account of excess claim u/s 80IC in relation to transfer from non 80IC units to 80IC units as disallowed by the A.O. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing a relief of Rs.74,95,918/- made by A.O. while determining the adjustment on account

HARI SHANKAR SINGHANIA ESTATE,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT SPL. RANGE - 18, NEW DELHI

In the result, for statistical purposes the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2014-15 Hari Shankar Singhania Estate, Vs. Jcit, Patroit House, 3, Special Range-18 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 002 Pan Aaaah9163Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

disallowed the credit of TDS of Rs. 15 lakhs deducted by the two companies on the commission payment using the PAN of the appellant i.e. the Estate of Late Shn Han Shankar Singhania In the written - submission, the AR has claimed the credit for TDS by stating that after the death of Shn Hari Shankar Singhania, payment could be made

C & S ELECTRIC LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, LTU, NEW DELHI

In the result, the revenue's appeal stands dismissed as above

Disallowance of Club expenses of Rs.1,59,005/- (Gr. No. 4).\n6. The assessee has claimed deductions under section 80IC and 10AA of\nthe Act for its units situated in Uttarakhand and NOIDA respectively. The AO,\nquestioning the pricing of goods/material transferred to & from exempted to\nnon-exempted units & vice-versa and allocating the Head Office expenses of\nRs.4

DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, LTU, NEW DELHI vs. C & S ELECTRIC LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the revenue's appeal stands dismissed as above

Disallowance of Club expenses of Rs.1,59,005/- (Gr. No. 4).\n6. The assessee has claimed deductions under section 80IC and 10AA of\nthe Act for its units situated in Uttarakhand and NOIDA respectively. The AO,\nquestioning the pricing of goods/material transferred to & from exempted to\nnon-exempted units & vice-versa and allocating the Head Office expenses of\nRs.4