BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 197A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi6Chennai6Cochin4Bangalore3Jaipur3Mumbai3Nagpur3Chandigarh1Pune1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)8Section 145(2)8Section 197A6Addition to Income6Section 145(3)4Section 2094Section 35D(2)(c)4Section 404Section 322Capital Gains

MAYAR HEALTH RESORTS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 326/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Sudhir Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Raghav Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Anshul, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(2)Section 145(3)Section 209Section 35D(2)(c)

2,04,51,871 1,94,68,282 (offered in AY 2009-10 2009-10 3,93,89,691/- Amt. of AY 2008-09 = 1,97,81,794/- 1,94,68,282/- (offered in AY Amt. of AY 2009-10 = 2010-11) 1,96,07,897/- Total amount offered

2
Transfer Pricing2
Deduction2

JCIT (OSD) CIRCLE- 16(2), NEW DELHI vs. MAYAR HEALTH RESORTS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 3548/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Sudhir Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Raghav Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Anshul, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(2)Section 145(3)Section 209Section 35D(2)(c)

2,04,51,871 1,94,68,282 (offered in AY 2009-10 2009-10 3,93,89,691/- Amt. of AY 2008-09 = 1,97,81,794/- 1,94,68,282/- (offered in AY Amt. of AY 2009-10 = 2010-11) 1,96,07,897/- Total amount offered

MAYAR HEALTH RESORTS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 5109/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Sudhir Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Raghav Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Anshul, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(2)Section 145(3)Section 209Section 35D(2)(c)

2,04,51,871 1,94,68,282 (offered in AY 2009-10 2009-10 3,93,89,691/- Amt. of AY 2008-09 = 1,97,81,794/- 1,94,68,282/- (offered in AY Amt. of AY 2009-10 = 2010-11) 1,96,07,897/- Total amount offered

MAYAR HEALTH RESORTS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 6228/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Sudhir Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Raghav Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Anshul, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(2)Section 145(3)Section 209Section 35D(2)(c)

2,04,51,871 1,94,68,282 (offered in AY 2009-10 2009-10 3,93,89,691/- Amt. of AY 2008-09 = 1,97,81,794/- 1,94,68,282/- (offered in AY Amt. of AY 2009-10 = 2010-11) 1,96,07,897/- Total amount offered

DCIT, CIRCLE-9(1), NEW DELHI vs. FABINDIA OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 8288/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharatdr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Rajan Bhatia, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Mrinal Kumar Das, Sr. DR
Section 197ASection 234CSection 32Section 40Section 48

2. On the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act on account of non-deduction of tax on credit card charges of Rs.3,34,75,810/-.” ITA No. 7980/Del/2019 : (Assessee Appeal) Depreciation on Trade

FABINDIA OVERSEAS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. JOINT CIT SPECIAL RANGE-3, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 7980/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharatdr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Rajan Bhatia, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Mrinal Kumar Das, Sr. DR
Section 197ASection 234CSection 32Section 40Section 48

2. On the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act on account of non-deduction of tax on credit card charges of Rs.3,34,75,810/-.” ITA No. 7980/Del/2019 : (Assessee Appeal) Depreciation on Trade