BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

37 results for “disallowance”+ Section 158Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai82Bangalore47Delhi37Hyderabad28Jaipur14Chandigarh14Pune9Nagpur6Karnataka5Cochin5Chennai4Lucknow4SC2Indore2Guwahati2Rajkot2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Telangana1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 153A58Addition to Income32Section 13230Section 69A21Section 143(3)19Section 37(1)18Search & Seizure18Disallowance16Unexplained Money13Section 153C

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M.S.AGGARWAL

ITA - 169 / 2005HC Delhi23 Apr 2018
Section 132Section 158Section 260

Section 139(1) of the Act, every person who is assessable under the Act, must file a return declaring his or her total income during the previous year on or before the due date, for assessment under Section 143 of the Act. Hence, the ―disclosure of income‖ is the disclosure of the total income in a valid return under Section

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SPLENDOR LANDBASE LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Revenue stand dismissed

ITA 2461/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jun 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Kanti.T.A. No.2461/Del/2016 A.Y. : 2010-11 Assistant Commissioner M/S Splendor Landbase Of Income, Central Vs. Limited, Circle-3, F-38/2, Splendor House, New Delhi Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-Ii, New Delhi (Pan: Aaeca3986E) (Appellant) (Respondent) & C.O. No. 215/Del/2016 In I.T.A. No. 2461/Del/2016 A.Y. : 2010-11 M/S Splendor Landbase Assistant Commissioner Limited, Vs. Of Income, Central Circle- F-38/2, Splendor House, 3, Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi Phase-Ii, New Delhi (Pan: Aaeca3986E) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Showing 1–20 of 37 · Page 1 of 2

11
Section 133(6)10
Undisclosed Income10
For Appellant: Sh. Anil Kr. Chopra, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR)
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154

disallowing carry forward of loss in 153A assessment is proper, because the return was belated in accordance with provisions of section 139(3). 9. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant records especially the case laws cited by both the parties. We have also gone through the provisions of section 153A of the Act which is reproduced

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SANGEETA MISHRA

ITA/423/2004HC Delhi03 Mar 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 158BSection 68

158B as that income "which has not been or would not have been disclosed for the purposes of this Act". The legislature has chosen to define "undisclosed income" in terms of income not disclosed, without providing any definition of "disclosure" of income in the first place. We are of the view that the only way of disclosing income

DCIT, CC-31, NEW DELHI vs. ENN VEE HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 1841/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132(4)

158B(b), it is at once clear that a statement recorded under section 132(4) can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable to any incriminating document or material found

DCIT- CC-31, NEW DELHI vs. REALTIME MARKETING PVT. LTD., DELHI

ITA 1837/DEL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132(4)

158B(b), it is at once clear that a statement recorded under section 132(4) can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable to any incriminating document or material found

DCIT, CC-31, NEW DELHI vs. REALTIME MARKETING PVT. LTD., DELHI

ITA 1838/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132(4)

158B(b), it is at once clear that a statement recorded under section 132(4) can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable to any incriminating document or material found

DCIT, CC-31, NEW DELHI vs. ENN VEE HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 1840/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132(4)

158B(b), it is at once clear that a statement recorded under section 132(4) can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable to any incriminating document or material found

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, DELHI

ITA 5520/DEL/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

158B(b) of the Act, it is at once clear that a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7838/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel andFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

158B(b) of the Act, it is at once clear that a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, DELHI

ITA 5517/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

disallowance of Rs.88.95 lakh out of total purchases of Rs.5.73 crore made by the A.O. and allow the Ground No. 6 of the Assessee. (iii) Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Range-5(3) v/s M/s. Radiant Shipping Ltd./ ITA no.1540/Mum. /2011/ (Assessment Year: 2001-02) dated 27.05.2016 " 23. We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused the material

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7841/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

disallowance of Rs.88.95 lakh out of total purchases of Rs.5.73 crore made by the A.O. and allow the Ground No. 6 of the Assessee. (iii) Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Range-5(3) v/s M/s. Radiant Shipping Ltd./ ITA no.1540/Mum. /2011/ (Assessment Year: 2001-02) dated 27.05.2016 " 23. We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused the material

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 05, DELHI

ITA 5515/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel andFor Respondent: Ms. Monika Singh, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

disallowance of Rs.88.95 lakh out of total purchases of Rs.5.73 crore made by the A.O. and allow the Ground No. 6 of the Assessee. (iii) Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Range-5(3) v/s M/s. Radiant Shipping Ltd./ ITA no.1540/Mum. /2011/ (Assessment Year: 2001-02) dated 27.05.2016 " 23. We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused the material

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -05 , DELHI

ITA 5521/DEL/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel and Shri Pranav Yadav, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

158B(b) of the Act, it is at once clear that a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7842/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel and Shri Pranav Yadav, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

158B(b) of the Act, it is at once clear that a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7840/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel and Shri Pranav Yadav, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

158B(b) of the Act, it is at once clear that a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable

DCIT, CC-31, NEW DELHI vs. REALTIME MARKETING PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, the addition made u/s 68 and u/s 56(2)(viib) in the case of M/s Realtime Marketing Pvt

ITA 1839/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 68

158B(b), it is at once clear that a statement recorded under section 132(4) can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable to any incriminating document or material found

ENN VEE HOLDINGS PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 31, NEW DELHI

In the result, the addition made u/s 68 and u/s 56(2)(viib) in the case of M/s Realtime Marketing Pvt

ITA 1195/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 68

158B(b), it is at once clear that a statement recorded under section 132(4) can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable to any incriminating document or material found

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-20 , DELHI vs. BHAGWATI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. , KOLKATA

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1255/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Anubhav Sharmaassessment Year: 2016-17 Peerless Consultancy Services Vs Acit, Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, Central Circle-16, C/O Rc Rai & Associates, New Delhi. 203, 2Nd Floor, Akash Deep Building, 26A, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. Pan: Aacct0544M Assessment Year: 2016-17 Acit, Peerless Consultancy Services Central Circle-16, Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, New Delhi. C/O Rc Rai & Associates, 203, 2Nd Floor, Akash Deep Building, 26A, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. Pan: Aacct0544M Assessment Year : 2016-17 Acit, Gajanand Development Ltd. Central Circle-16, Kolkata, New Delhi C/O Rc Rai & Associates, 203, 2Nd Floor, Akash Deep Building, 26A, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. Pan: Aabcg0151G

For Appellant: Shri R.C. Rai, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Waseem Arshad, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 271ASection 69A

158B(b) of the Act, it is at once clear that a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-16, NEW DELHI vs. GAJANAND DEVELOPMENT LTD, KOLKATA

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 9866/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Anubhav Sharmaassessment Year: 2016-17 Peerless Consultancy Services Vs Acit, Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, Central Circle-16, C/O Rc Rai & Associates, New Delhi. 203, 2Nd Floor, Akash Deep Building, 26A, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. Pan: Aacct0544M Assessment Year: 2016-17 Acit, Peerless Consultancy Services Central Circle-16, Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, New Delhi. C/O Rc Rai & Associates, 203, 2Nd Floor, Akash Deep Building, 26A, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. Pan: Aacct0544M Assessment Year : 2016-17 Acit, Gajanand Development Ltd. Central Circle-16, Kolkata, New Delhi C/O Rc Rai & Associates, 203, 2Nd Floor, Akash Deep Building, 26A, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. Pan: Aabcg0151G

For Appellant: Shri R.C. Rai, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Waseem Arshad, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 271ASection 69A

158B(b) of the Act, it is at once clear that a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-16, NEW DELHI vs. VIJAYA FINANCE CORPORATION LTD, KOLKATA

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 9869/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Anubhav Sharmaassessment Year: 2016-17 Peerless Consultancy Services Vs Acit, Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, Central Circle-16, C/O Rc Rai & Associates, New Delhi. 203, 2Nd Floor, Akash Deep Building, 26A, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. Pan: Aacct0544M Assessment Year: 2016-17 Acit, Peerless Consultancy Services Central Circle-16, Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, New Delhi. C/O Rc Rai & Associates, 203, 2Nd Floor, Akash Deep Building, 26A, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. Pan: Aacct0544M Assessment Year : 2016-17 Acit, Gajanand Development Ltd. Central Circle-16, Kolkata, New Delhi C/O Rc Rai & Associates, 203, 2Nd Floor, Akash Deep Building, 26A, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. Pan: Aabcg0151G

For Appellant: Shri R.C. Rai, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Waseem Arshad, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 271ASection 69A

158B(b) of the Act, it is at once clear that a statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act can be used in evidence for making a block assessment only if the said statement is made in the context of other evidence or material discovered during the search. A statement of a person, which is not relatable