BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

27 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10(23)(iiiad)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi27Bangalore25Mumbai16Cuttack15Jaipur12Chennai10Chandigarh8Indore7Amritsar6Ahmedabad6Pune5Rajkot3Lucknow3Raipur2Cochin2Patna2Varanasi2Kolkata2Visakhapatnam1Jodhpur1Karnataka1Ranchi1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 1045Section 1127Exemption24Section 10(23)(iiiad)20Section 14816Section 12A16Addition to Income15Section 143(3)14Section 14712Disallowance

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. AIPECCS SOCIETY

ITA/924/2009HC Delhi07 Oct 2015
For Appellant: Mr Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standing CounselFor Respondent: Mr Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with
Section 10Section 158BSection 260A

23)(vi) of the Act. 54. Insofar as the question whether the university or educational institution existing solely for educational purposes could be denied the 2015:DHC:8430-DB ITA 705/2008, 924/2009 & W.P.(C) 3797/2011 Page 45 of 71 benefit of Section 10(22)/10(23C)(vi) on the ground that its receipts exceeded its expenditure is concerned, the same

GANDHI COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,KARNAL vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3476/DEL/2012[2004-05]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

12
Section 153A11
Natural Justice10
ITAT Delhi
03 Feb 2017
AY 2004-05

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. C. M. Garg, Jm Ita No. 3476/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Gandhi College Of Pharmacy, Vs Acit, Near Iti Chowk, G. T. Road, Circle, Karnal Karnal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaatg5629D Assessee By : Sh. Ved Jain, Adv. & Ashish Goel, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 02.12.2016 Date Of Pronouncement : 03.02.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 19.03.2012 Of Ld. Cit(A), Karnal. 2. Following Grounds Have Been Raised In This Appeal: “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)] Is Bad Both In The Eye Of Law & On Facts. 2(I) On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Cit(A) Has Erred Both On Facts & In Law In Confirming The Action Of A.O. In Holding That The Assesses Is Not Eligible For Exemption Under Section 10(23C)(Iiiad) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, Adv., & Ashish Goel, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 139Section 143(3)Section 2(31)Section 263(1)

disallowance of exemption U/S 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act, as proposed in the notice in view of the facts of the case and law on the subject.” 6. The AO after considering the submissions of the assessee observed that for the assessment year 2003-04, it was held that the assessee’s society solely exited for the purpose

CHAUDHARY CHARAN SINGH HARYANA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY,HISSAR vs. ITO,EXEMPTION, ROHTAK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2225/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year 2018-19]

Section 10Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151

disallowed by ld. AO 8. However, CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO by denying the exemption claimed by the assessee u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) amounting to Rs 25,74,64,090/-. 9. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), assessee filed an appeal before Your Honours. No condition of filing of return of income to claim the exemption

JCIT, MUZAFFARNAGAR vs. M/S. SHAMLI SAMAJ KALAYAN SAMITI, MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for both the years are dismissed

ITA 5781/DEL/2011[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2015AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri A.T. Varkey

For Appellant: Shri Ankit Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri James Singsun, Senior DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143

section 10(23C)(iiiad) as well as u/s 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not available to the assessee and by estimate income to the extent of Rs.20,00,000/- is escaped assessment. Issue notice u/s 148 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.... " 13 ITA Nos.5781 & 5782/Del./2011 Subsequently, the A.O. issued detailed show cause notice

JCIT, MUZAFFARNAGAR vs. M/S. SHAMLI SAMAJ KALAYAN SAMITI, MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for both the years are dismissed

ITA 5782/DEL/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2015AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri A.T. Varkey

For Appellant: Shri Ankit Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri James Singsun, Senior DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143

section 10(23C)(iiiad) as well as u/s 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not available to the assessee and by estimate income to the extent of Rs.20,00,000/- is escaped assessment. Issue notice u/s 148 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.... " 13 ITA Nos.5781 & 5782/Del./2011 Subsequently, the A.O. issued detailed show cause notice

SETH ANANDRAM JAIPURIA EDUCATION SOCIETY,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION), GHAZIABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee with respect to ground

ITA 2615/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Sept 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishiseth Anandram Jaipuria Education Vs. Dcit (Exemption), Society, Exemption Circle, Sector-14C, Vasundhara, Ghaziabad Ghaziabad Pan:Aaaas0860P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Smt Paramita Tripathy, CIT DRFor Respondent: Sh. RS Singhvi, CA
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12Section 143Section 2(15)

disallowance of claim of exemption u/s 11 is misconceived and without proper understanding of law. (ii) That the ld CIT(A) has made distorted observation regarding total utilization of funds by the society and the adverse observation in regard of provisions of section 11(1) is based on wrong premise and same is irrelevant and unsustainable under the facts

BHARTIYA GRAM SEVA NIKETAN UDYOG MANDAL,ROORKEE vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS, DEHRADUN

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6954/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Jun 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu

Section 10Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250(6)

disallowed the expenses for health camp and blanket distribution amounting in total to Rs. 1,73,635/-. Thus, a total amount brought to tax by the AO was Rs. 7,58,504/- against the declared taxable income of Rs. NIL vide his order dated 25.7.2016 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act. Against the assessment order, the Assessee appealed before

BHARTIYA GRAM SEVA NIKETAN UDYOG MANDAL,ROORKEE vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS, DEHRADUN

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6955/DEL/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Jun 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu

Section 10Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250(6)

disallowed the expenses for health camp and blanket distribution amounting in total to Rs. 1,73,635/-. Thus, a total amount brought to tax by the AO was Rs. 7,58,504/- against the declared taxable income of Rs. NIL vide his order dated 25.7.2016 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act. Against the assessment order, the Assessee appealed before

BHAAVICK SOCIETY ,HARYANA PANCHKULA vs. CIT(A)NFAC , FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeals are allowed to the extent indicated

ITA 1584/DEL/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyita Nos. 1582 To 1586/Del/2021 Assessment Years: 2012-13 To 2016-17

Section 10(23)(iiiad)Section 147Section 148Section 194J

Section 10(23)(iiiad) and offered the surplus income to tax. 3 ITA Nos.1582 to 1586/Del./2021 4. In course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer called upon the assessee to produce its books of accounts and other details in support of the expenses claimed. After verifying the books of account and other details, the Assessing Officer observed that complete

BHAAVICK SOCIETY ,HARYANA PANCHKULA vs. CIT(A)NFAC , FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeals are allowed to the extent indicated

ITA 1582/DEL/2021[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyita Nos. 1582 To 1586/Del/2021 Assessment Years: 2012-13 To 2016-17

Section 10(23)(iiiad)Section 147Section 148Section 194J

Section 10(23)(iiiad) and offered the surplus income to tax. 3 ITA Nos.1582 to 1586/Del./2021 4. In course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer called upon the assessee to produce its books of accounts and other details in support of the expenses claimed. After verifying the books of account and other details, the Assessing Officer observed that complete

BHAAVICK SOCIETY ,HARYANA PANCHKULA vs. CIT(A)NFAC , FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeals are allowed to the extent indicated

ITA 1586/DEL/2021[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2023AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyita Nos. 1582 To 1586/Del/2021 Assessment Years: 2012-13 To 2016-17

Section 10(23)(iiiad)Section 147Section 148Section 194J

Section 10(23)(iiiad) and offered the surplus income to tax. 3 ITA Nos.1582 to 1586/Del./2021 4. In course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer called upon the assessee to produce its books of accounts and other details in support of the expenses claimed. After verifying the books of account and other details, the Assessing Officer observed that complete

BHAAVICK SOCIETY ,HARYANA PANCHKULA vs. CIT(A)NFAC , FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeals are allowed to the extent indicated

ITA 1583/DEL/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyita Nos. 1582 To 1586/Del/2021 Assessment Years: 2012-13 To 2016-17

Section 10(23)(iiiad)Section 147Section 148Section 194J

Section 10(23)(iiiad) and offered the surplus income to tax. 3 ITA Nos.1582 to 1586/Del./2021 4. In course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer called upon the assessee to produce its books of accounts and other details in support of the expenses claimed. After verifying the books of account and other details, the Assessing Officer observed that complete

BHAAVICK SOCIETY ,HARYANA PANCHKULA vs. CIT(A)NFAC , FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeals are allowed to the extent indicated

ITA 1585/DEL/2021[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyita Nos. 1582 To 1586/Del/2021 Assessment Years: 2012-13 To 2016-17

Section 10(23)(iiiad)Section 147Section 148Section 194J

Section 10(23)(iiiad) and offered the surplus income to tax. 3 ITA Nos.1582 to 1586/Del./2021 4. In course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer called upon the assessee to produce its books of accounts and other details in support of the expenses claimed. After verifying the books of account and other details, the Assessing Officer observed that complete

FIZA EDUCATION SOCIETY,BULANDSHAHR vs. ITO(EXEMPTION) WAQRD, GHAZIABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3709/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Akarsh Garg, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 45

disallowing exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) for which, there exists no legal precedent and therefore, the same deserves dismissal from this Ld. Tribunal. 2. Before us Ld. Counsel for the assessee Shri Akarsh Garg, challenging the validity of reopening u/s 148, submitted that the assessee is a Society, which is registered under Society Registration Act. The Society is running

` NIHARIKA EDUCATION SOCIETY,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the ground nos

ITA 6183/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Jan 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.V. Mehrotraassessment Year : 2010-11 Niharika Education Society, Addl. Cit, Range-1, C/O Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate, Ghaziabad. Chamber No.206-07, Vs. Ansal “Satyam”, Rdc Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad. Pan : Aaatn 6147 P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Akhilesh Kumar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 10Section 10(23)(c)Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 80G

iiiad) of the Act. 4. Because, the learned commissioner of income tax (A) further erred in upholding the disallowance depreciation Rs.2,17,800/- debited to P&L A/c by considering the same as double claim ignoring the fact that assessee has not claimed the cost of assets as utilization and also ignoring the ratio of hon’ble jurisdictional tribunal. Therefore

M/S. JAYCEES PUBLIC SCHOOL,NEW DELHI vs. CIT, HALDWANI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed with about direction

ITA 4554/DEL/2012[]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Oct 2017

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishijaycees Public School, Vs. Ito, C/O. M/S. Rra Taxindia, Rudrapur D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi Pan:Aaaaj2776K (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Taneja, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Varma, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(3)

iiiad) or u/s 10(23C)(vi) to the appellant society.” 16. For assessment year 2006 – 07 The Ld. assessing officer for the similar reasons as stated by the assessing officer in his order for assessment year 2008 – 09 in case of the assessee has reopened the assessment of the assessee by issuing notice under section 148 of the income

ITO (E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1131/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Ms. TejasviFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

10(23)(iiiad) as there was surplus in its account books after meeting all expenses incurred towards imparting education and it had invested said surplus in fixed assets like furniture and buildings with a view to expand institution and to earn more income. 28. He submitted that the judgment of Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court in the case

IILM FOUNDAION,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT (EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1142/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Ms. TejasviFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

10(23)(iiiad) as there was surplus in its account books after meeting all expenses incurred towards imparting education and it had invested said surplus in fixed assets like furniture and buildings with a view to expand institution and to earn more income. 28. He submitted that the judgment of Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court in the case

ADIT (E), NEW DELHI vs. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2675/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Ms. TejasviFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

10(23)(iiiad) as there was surplus in its account books after meeting all expenses incurred towards imparting education and it had invested said surplus in fixed assets like furniture and buildings with a view to expand institution and to earn more income. 28. He submitted that the judgment of Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court in the case

ADIT(E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. IILM FOUNDATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2871/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Adv., Ms. TejasviFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

10(23)(iiiad) as there was surplus in its account books after meeting all expenses incurred towards imparting education and it had invested said surplus in fixed assets like furniture and buildings with a view to expand institution and to earn more income. 28. He submitted that the judgment of Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court in the case