BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 801Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata4Ahmedabad3Delhi2Mumbai2Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 14A6Deduction2Disallowance2

SICPA INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 23(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 7048/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Surana, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saras Kumar, Senior DR
Section 14A

801e. 2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (Appeals) was not justified and grossly erred in not allowing deduction of leave encashment claimed on provision basis amounting to Rs.7,19,216/-. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (Appeals) was not justified and grossly

DCIT, CIRCLE- 23(2), NEW DELHI vs. SICPA INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 7483/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Surana, CA
For Respondent: Shri Saras Kumar, Senior DR
Section 14A

801e. 2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (Appeals) was not justified and grossly erred in not allowing deduction of leave encashment claimed on provision basis amounting to Rs.7,19,216/-. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (Appeals) was not justified and grossly