VEDANTA LTD ,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 26(2), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh[Assessment Year: 2014-15]

35E also speaks of production in the context of mining activity. The language of these sections is similar to the language of section 32A(2). There is no reason for us to assume that the word "production" was used in a different sense in section 32A. 9. We are, therefore, of the opinion that extraction and processing of iron

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. DHARA VEGETABLE OIL AND FOODS COMPANY LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Smt Beena A. Pillai[A.Y 2003-04] The Dy. C.I.T Vs. M/S Dhara Vegetable Oil & Foods Circle – 5(1) Company Ltd [Now Amalgamated New Delhi With Mother Dairy Fruit & Vegetable Pvt. Ltd, Mother Dairy, Patparganj, New Delhi Pan : Aaccm 3174 A [Appellant] [Respondent] Date Of Hearing : 25.09.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 11.10.2018

35E as under: Name of the Institution Section Amount Deduction Debited Rs. Allowable In house capital 35(2)(ia) 1,04,235 1,04,235 Mother Dairy Fruits and 35(i)(iv) 1,96,910 1,96,910 Rs. expenditure Delhi University 35(i)(ii) 9,12,544 11,40,680 Vegetable Ltd. Total

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. AIPECCS SOCIETY

depreciation. 7. Aggrieved by the order dated 29th November, 2001 passed by the CIT(A), the Assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal, which too was dismissed by an order dated 25th June, 2004. The Tribunal upheld the AO’s finding that the Assessee was not functioning solely for the purposes of education and, therefore, was not eligible for exemption