BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “depreciation”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai13Delhi11Ahmedabad9Pune6Mumbai6Jaipur2Chandigarh2Raipur2Cochin2SC1Bangalore1Cuttack1Hyderabad1Lucknow1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 14816Section 1116Addition to Income10Penalty9Section 1478Section 1428Section 1398Section 272A(2)(e)8Exemption8Reassessment

SH. SANJAY DALMIA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result all the appeal filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 3795/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Oct 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri SS Rana, CIT DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(b)

272A. 4.3 Thus, in the facts of present case there was a information the appellant is engaged in suspected tax evasion by transferring or keeping funds overseas in an illicit manner. The appellant is suspected of having opened and maintained undisclosed bank account overseas and was required to sign the "consent form" to verify the allegation. It is the duty

8
Section 142(1)6
Section 54F4

VINAY CHAUDHARY,PITAMPURA vs. ACIT INT TAX 1(2)(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed

ITA 3115/DEL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: “Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 54Section 54FSection 69A

e-filing portal. Note: You are required to give copy of every agreement and invoice as asked for in the notice. In case of voluminous data, you may send the details in soft copy through a pendrive / CD to the office of the undersigned. Note: Please note that all details may be uploaded in the manner and order in which

DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD vs. UNITED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY C/O NIMT COLLEGE, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4392/DEL/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 139Section 142Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

272A(2)(e) & not denying exemption u/s 11 of the Act. VII. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and law in confirming the action of AO in taking Rs. 6,61,58,482/- as returned income of the Assessee. VIII. On the facts and circumstances of the case

M/S. UNITED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,GHAZIABAD vs. JCIT, GHAZIABAD

ITA 3675/DEL/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 139Section 142Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

272A(2)(e) & not denying exemption u/s 11 of the Act. VII. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and law in confirming the action of AO in taking Rs. 6,61,58,482/- as returned income of the Assessee. VIII. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ITO, EXEMPTION WARD , GHAZIABAD vs. UNITED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY C/O NIMT COLLEGE, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4563/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 139Section 142Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

272A(2)(e) & not denying exemption u/s 11 of the Act. VII. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and law in confirming the action of AO in taking Rs. 6,61,58,482/- as returned income of the Assessee. VIII. On the facts and circumstances of the case

UNITED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY C/O NIMT COLLEGE,GHAZIABAD vs. JCIT, RANGE- 2 , GHAZIABAD

ITA 2733/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 139Section 142Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

272A(2)(e) & not denying exemption u/s 11 of the Act. VII. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and law in confirming the action of AO in taking Rs. 6,61,58,482/- as returned income of the Assessee. VIII. On the facts and circumstances of the case

UNITED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY C/O NIMT COLLEGE,GHAZIABAD vs. JCIT, RANGE- 2 , GHAZIABAD

ITA 2734/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 139Section 142Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

272A(2)(e) & not denying exemption u/s 11 of the Act. VII. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and law in confirming the action of AO in taking Rs. 6,61,58,482/- as returned income of the Assessee. VIII. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ITO, EXEMPTION WARD , GHAZIABAD vs. UNITED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY C/O NIMT COLLEGE, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4564/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 139Section 142Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

272A(2)(e) & not denying exemption u/s 11 of the Act. VII. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and law in confirming the action of AO in taking Rs. 6,61,58,482/- as returned income of the Assessee. VIII. On the facts and circumstances of the case

DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD vs. UNITED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY C/O NIMT COLLEGE, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4393/DEL/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 139Section 142Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

272A(2)(e) & not denying exemption u/s 11 of the Act. VII. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and law in confirming the action of AO in taking Rs. 6,61,58,482/- as returned income of the Assessee. VIII. On the facts and circumstances of the case

M/S. UNITED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,GHAZIABAD vs. JCIT, GHAZIABAD

ITA 3674/DEL/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 139Section 142Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

272A(2)(e) & not denying exemption u/s 11 of the Act. VII. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred, both on facts and law in confirming the action of AO in taking Rs. 6,61,58,482/- as returned income of the Assessee. VIII. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ITO, WARD- 12(3), NEW DELHI vs. INTEGRA TELECOMMUNICATION & SOFTWARE PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 4260/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Anuj Garg, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 68

e) Show Cause Notice u/s 142(1) dated 14/03/2016. 5. Final show cause notice served upon the assessee is re- produced below: Office of the Income Tax Officer, Ward-12(3), Room No. 420-B, C. R. Building, I. P. Estate, New Delhi -110002. TIME BARRING MATTER FINAL OPPORTUNITY F. No. ITO/Ward-12(3)/75/2015-16/ Dated: 14.03.2016 PAN No. AAACI9473Q