BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “depreciation”+ Section 268Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi13Mumbai10Cochin7Karnataka7Ahmedabad3Chennai2Bangalore1

Key Topics

Disallowance9Depreciation8Addition to Income8Section 268A5Section 14A5Section 404Section 11(6)2Section 722Section 792Section 143(2)2Deduction2Set Off of Losses2

M/S. LAKHANI INDIA LTD.,FARIDABAD vs. ADDL.CIT, FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the ld

ITA 3736/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Sept 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiacit, Vs. Lakhani India Ltd, Circle-Ii, Block-B, Plot No. 131, New Cgo Complex, Nh-Iv, Nit, Sector-24, Faridabad Faridabad Pan: Aaacl3113G (Appellant) (Respondent) Lakhani India Ltd, Vs. Acit, Plot No. 131, Circle-Ii, Block-B, Sector-24, Faridabad New Cgo Complex, Nh-Iv, Pan: Aaacl3113G Nit, Faridabad (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Amit Jain, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 14ASection 40

depreciation on the above amount therefore it is apparent that the expenditure incurred by the assessee in ACIT Vs. Lakhani India Ltd, ITA No. 3984/Del/2014 & 3736/Del/2014 (Assessment Year: 2008-09) the form of legal and professional fees paid to an architect is for the purpose of construction of building and is capital in nature. Before the lower authorities, assessee could

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. URBANE THE DESIGN WORKSHOP, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the department is dismissed and Cross

ITA 4330/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava, Jm Ita No. 4330/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Acit, Vs Urbane The Design Workshop, 5, South Appts Mis Flats, 1St Floor, Circle-61(1), New Delhi Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabfu7451L Co No. 303/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Urbane The Design Workshop, Vs Acit, 5, South Appts Mis Flats, 1St Circle-61(1), Floor, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabfu7451L Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 31.07.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.08.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: The Appeal By The Department & The Cross Objection Of The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Dated 17.05.2016 Of Ld. Cit(A)-20, New Delhi.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 268Section 268A

Section 268A of Income Tax Act, 1961, we are of the view that the Revenue should not have filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal. 7. In the Cross Objection, the only grievance of the assessee relates to the confirmation of addition of Rs.43,376/- made by the AO by disallowing the 10% car running and other expenses, on estimate

M/S TIMES INTERNET LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 2333/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Oct 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri Salil Agarwal, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri I.P.S. Bindra, CIT- DR
Section 14A

268A clearly divulges that even if the Revenue fails to file any appeal on an issue for an earlier year, there can be no embargo on its power to file an appeal on the said issue in a subsequent year. Sub-section (3) manifestly debars the assessee from contending before the appellate authorities that since the income-tax authority quietly

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S TIMES INTERNET LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 2986/DEL/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Oct 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri Salil Agarwal, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri I.P.S. Bindra, CIT- DR
Section 14A

268A clearly divulges that even if the Revenue fails to file any appeal on an issue for an earlier year, there can be no embargo on its power to file an appeal on the said issue in a subsequent year. Sub-section (3) manifestly debars the assessee from contending before the appellate authorities that since the income-tax authority quietly

ITO (E), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. VISHWESHRAIYA EDUCATIONAL TRUST, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 5200/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S. Syalassessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: None
Section 11(6)Section 268A

section 268A, the CBDT has issued Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 with retrospective effect, revising the monetary limit to Rs.10,00,000/- for not filing appeals before the Tribunal. I further find that as the tax effect involved in the instant appeal is less than Rs.10,00,000/-, the extant appeal is not maintainable. 3. From para

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. NEOSTYLE INTERIORS (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the Departmental Appeal is not maintainable as have been filed against the instruction of the Board

ITA 5171/DEL/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Dec 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini, J.M. & Shri O.P. Kant, A.M.

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Smt. Naina Soin Kapil, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 268A

depreciation in a sum of Rs.Rs.2,17,098/-. Thus, admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental Appeal is below Rs.20 lakhs. Vide Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by CBDT under section 268A

M/S. SHARP MENTHOL INDIA LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 1195/DEL/2009[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Aug 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri N.K. Billaiya[A.Y 2006-07] & Co No. 70/Del/2013 (A/O Ita No. 379/Del/2012 [A.Y 2007-08])

For Appellant: Shri S.D. Kapila, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT- DR
Section 40

depreciation on the surrendered income of Rs. 75 lakhs and in A.Y 2007-08, the Revenue is aggrieved by the deletion of disallowance of Rs. 1,20,52,213/- made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act']. 3. A perusal of the grievances of the revenue shows

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SHARP MENTHOL INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 379/DEL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Aug 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri N.K. Billaiya[A.Y 2006-07] & Co No. 70/Del/2013 (A/O Ita No. 379/Del/2012 [A.Y 2007-08])

For Appellant: Shri S.D. Kapila, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT- DR
Section 40

depreciation on the surrendered income of Rs. 75 lakhs and in A.Y 2007-08, the Revenue is aggrieved by the deletion of disallowance of Rs. 1,20,52,213/- made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act']. 3. A perusal of the grievances of the revenue shows

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SCALE MENTHOL INDIA LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 1291/DEL/2009[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Aug 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Shri N.K. Billaiya[A.Y 2006-07] & Co No. 70/Del/2013 (A/O Ita No. 379/Del/2012 [A.Y 2007-08])

For Appellant: Shri S.D. Kapila, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT- DR
Section 40

depreciation on the surrendered income of Rs. 75 lakhs and in A.Y 2007-08, the Revenue is aggrieved by the deletion of disallowance of Rs. 1,20,52,213/- made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act']. 3. A perusal of the grievances of the revenue shows

M/S HALDIRAM MANUACTUING CO. PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5179/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jan 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: H.S Sidhu & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2010-11 M/S. Haldiram Manufacturing Co. Vs. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Pvt. Ltd., B-1/H-3, Mohan Co- Tax, Range 12, New Delhi Operative Indl. Estate, Main Mathura Road, New Delhi. (Pan: Aaach3170K) (Appellant) (Respondent) & Assessment Year: 2010-11 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Haldiram Manufacturing Co. Tax, Circle-12(1), New Delhi Pvt. Ltd., B-1/H-3, Mohan Co- Operative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi. (Pan: Aaach3170K) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(2)

depreciation thereon at the applicable rates. In our view, the direction of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) on the issue in dispute are well reasoned and no interference is required by us. 8.3 In view of the above, we do not find any infirmity in the finding of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on the issue

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. HALDIRAM MANUFACTURING CO. PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6071/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jan 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: H.S Sidhu & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2010-11 M/S. Haldiram Manufacturing Co. Vs. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Pvt. Ltd., B-1/H-3, Mohan Co- Tax, Range 12, New Delhi Operative Indl. Estate, Main Mathura Road, New Delhi. (Pan: Aaach3170K) (Appellant) (Respondent) & Assessment Year: 2010-11 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Haldiram Manufacturing Co. Tax, Circle-12(1), New Delhi Pvt. Ltd., B-1/H-3, Mohan Co- Operative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi. (Pan: Aaach3170K) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(2)

depreciation thereon at the applicable rates. In our view, the direction of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) on the issue in dispute are well reasoned and no interference is required by us. 8.3 In view of the above, we do not find any infirmity in the finding of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on the issue

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. CREATIVE DYEING & PRINTING MILLS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6509/DEL/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Sh.L.P.Sahu

Section 268ASection 72Section 79

depreciation without any verification or the satisfaction of the provisions of section 72 and section 79 of the I.T.Act. 2. The appellant crave leave for reserving the right to amend, modify, alter, add or forego any ground(s) of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of this appeal.” 2. It was a common stand of the parties

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. CREATIVE DYEING & PRINTING MILLS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6508/DEL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Smt Diva Singh & Sh.L.P.Sahu

Section 268ASection 72Section 79

depreciation without any verification or the satisfaction of the provisions of section 72 and section 79 of the I.T.Act. 2. The appellant crave leave for reserving the right to amend, modify, alter, add or forego any ground(s) of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of this appeal.” 2. It was a common stand of the parties