BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

104 results for “depreciation”+ Section 194Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai157Delhi104Bangalore64Kolkata62Chennai50Raipur24Ahmedabad20Indore15Hyderabad13Amritsar11Visakhapatnam8Rajkot8Nagpur7Jaipur7Kerala5Patna4Jodhpur3Ranchi2Lucknow2Surat2Dehradun2Karnataka1Chandigarh1Cochin1Guwahati1Agra1Pune1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14A69Section 143(3)69Addition to Income64Disallowance58Deduction51Section 4048Section 115J37Depreciation37Section 153A34TDS

ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 7, NEW DELHI vs. QUIPPO OIL AND GAS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the ground no

ITA 3544/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

For Appellant: Ms. Alka ArrenFor Respondent: Shri T. Kipgen
Section 32Section 40Section 43B

depreciation is not allowed to other business concerns on the ground that the owner of these equipments is not a mineral oil concern but it is just providing an assistance or leasing these equipments to a mineral oil concern then definitely this "other concern" will charge more for these services and consequently the mineral oil concerns will be commercially forced

HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, NEW DELHI

Showing 1–20 of 104 · Page 1 of 6

27
Section 194C23
Section 144C15

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1545/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Oct 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. I. C. Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishihero Motocorp Limited, Jcit, 34, Basant Lok, Vasant Range-1, New Delhi Vs. Vihar, New Delhi Pan: Aaach0812J (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit, M/S. Hero Moto Corp. Circle-11(1), Ltd., 34, Community Vs. New Delhi Centre, Basant Lok, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi-110057 (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit, M/S. Hero Moto Corp. Circle-11(1), Ltd., 34, Community

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. NC Sawain, CIT DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

194C of the Act applied by the assessee. 17.2 Without prejudice, that on the facts and circumstances of the case, the assessing officer failed to appreciate that an expenditure cannot be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act if tax has been deducted at source there from under the provisions of the Act, notwithstanding that

M M CREATIONS,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 32(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on grounds no

ITA 436/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG (Judicial Member), DR. B.R.R. KUMAR (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Smita Singh, Sr. DR
Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 24Section 251Section 68

section 194C at all. The same be directed to be deleted. 6. That the learned CIT(A) has erred in holding the expenditure incurred on foreign travel by the employees and partners for non-business purpose by disallowing the claim of Rs. 7,34,657/- is patently incorrect as the assessee is an exporter and had to travel abroad

CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PVT. LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-73(1), DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 1984/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Advocate a/wFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar Varma, Sr.D.R
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194ISection 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

194C and not section 194I of the Act as the same are being paid for work_earried out for maintenance of common areas/ facilities available alongwith leased premise; 4.4. That the C1T(A)/ assessing officer erred in not appreciating that though rent and CAM charges were paid in accordance with the same agreement, however both rent payable and CAM charges

CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-73(1), NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 993/DEL/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Advocate a/wFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Kumar Varma, Sr.D.R
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194ISection 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

194C and not section 194I of the Act as the same are being paid for work_earried out for maintenance of common areas/ facilities available alongwith leased premise; 4.4. That the C1T(A)/ assessing officer erred in not appreciating that though rent and CAM charges were paid in accordance with the same agreement, however both rent payable and CAM charges

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. HELLMANN WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS INDIA P. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 6390/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Oct 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishidcit, Vs. Hellmann Worldwide Circle-12(1), Logistics India P. Ltd, New Delhi 110, 1St Floor, Akashdeep Building, 7, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aabch7715F (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Karnik Gulati, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amit Jain, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 194C

194C of the I.T. Act, 1961 is an appeal.” 3. Assessee, a company, filed its return of income on 30/10/2007 declaring loss of Rs. 3,48,75,480/–. Assessment under section 143 (3) of The Income Tax Act was passed on 27/11/2009 wherein several disallowances were made and taxable income of assessee was assessed at Rs. 607271/–. Assessment order

HERO MOTOCORP LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 11(1), NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1351/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N. K. Billaiya & Ms Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Amount of Proposed international
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 144C

depreciation on lease premium since such premium constitutes ‘business or commercial rights’ under section 32(1 )(ii) of the Act. 31. That the assessing officer erred on facts and in law in disallowing expenditure of Rs.23,44,222/- incurred under the head of ‘Community Development’ on the ground that the same was not incurred wholly and exclusively for earning business

SUDESH YADAV,MOHINDERGARH vs. ITO, WARD-2, NARNAUL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4912/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Nov 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini

For Appellant: Sh. P.C. Yadav, AdvFor Respondent: Dr. Anjula Jain, Sr. DR
Section 194CSection 40

depreciation was allowed. The AO, accordingly, disallowed Rs. 1,96,228/-. The CIT(A) on the same reasoning upheld the addition. 5. After considering the rival submission, I am of the view, addition is wholly unjustified. The assessee is running a business of retail Fuel Outlet (petrol pump). There is an increase in the GP rate in assessment year under

HERO MOTOCORP LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal No. 2424/Del/ 2015 filed by the revenue in assessment year 2010-11 is partly allowed

ITA 1616/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Jun 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

194C are not applicable and consequently the disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) is to be deleted. 14.96. It would be pertinent to point that section 194C was amended by the Finance (2) Act, 2009 w.e.f. 1.10.2009, whereby the definition of “work” was enlarged to include contract for manufacturing or supplying a product according to the requirement or specification

M/S. NIYANT HERITAGE HOTEL PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2725/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Delhi15 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Satish Khosla, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Takyar, Sr. DR
Section 24

section 194C of the Act and decide the issue afresh as per the provisions of law. The assessee gets relief of Rs. 3,01,510/-. Ground No. 7 is partly allowed. 30. Ground No. 8 relates to the disallowance of depreciation

DAAWAT FOODS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeal in ITA

ITA 4158/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Jan 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Kuldip Singh(Through Video Conferencing) & Daawat Foods Ltd., Vs. Acit, Unit No.134, 1St Floor, Central Circle – 19, Rectangle I, New Delhi Saket District Centre, Saket, New Delhi-110 017 Pan No. Aaccd 3698 N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. Ms. Deepashree Rao, C.A. Shri Vibhu Gupta, C.A. Revenue By Ms. Nidhi Srivastava, Cit-D.R Date Of Hearing: 17/12/2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 19/01/2021 Order Per Anil Chaturvedi, Am: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Dated 28.03.2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)-Xxxiii, New Delhi Relating To Assessment Years 2007-08 & 2008-09. Ita Nos.4157 & 4158/Del/2013 Daawat Foods Ltd Vs. Acit A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 2 2. The Relevant Facts As Culled From The Material On Records Are As Under:

Section 132Section 142Section 143(1)Section 153A

194C are not applicable to such payment and no TDS is required to be made payment. 16. That CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the provision of Section 40(a)(ia) are not applicable in respect of disallowances made y disallowance are unjust, unlawful and without any legal basis. 17. That the explanations given, evidence produced and material placed

DAAWAT FOODS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeal in ITA

ITA 4157/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Jan 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Kuldip Singh(Through Video Conferencing) & Daawat Foods Ltd., Vs. Acit, Unit No.134, 1St Floor, Central Circle – 19, Rectangle I, New Delhi Saket District Centre, Saket, New Delhi-110 017 Pan No. Aaccd 3698 N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. Ms. Deepashree Rao, C.A. Shri Vibhu Gupta, C.A. Revenue By Ms. Nidhi Srivastava, Cit-D.R Date Of Hearing: 17/12/2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 19/01/2021 Order Per Anil Chaturvedi, Am: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Dated 28.03.2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)-Xxxiii, New Delhi Relating To Assessment Years 2007-08 & 2008-09. Ita Nos.4157 & 4158/Del/2013 Daawat Foods Ltd Vs. Acit A.Y. 2007-08 & 2008-09 2 2. The Relevant Facts As Culled From The Material On Records Are As Under:

Section 132Section 142Section 143(1)Section 153A

194C are not applicable to such payment and no TDS is required to be made payment. 16. That CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the provision of Section 40(a)(ia) are not applicable in respect of disallowances made y disallowance are unjust, unlawful and without any legal basis. 17. That the explanations given, evidence produced and material placed

M/S AT & T GLOBAL BETWORK SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,,GURGAON vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 4882/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh[A.Y 2008-09] At &T Global Network Services [India] Vs. The Dy. C.I.T Pvt Ltd, Vatika Triangle Circle - 2 (1) 3Rd Floor, Sushant Lok - I New Delhi Block A, Gurgaon Pan: Aafca 8810 L [A.Y 2008-09] The Dy. C.I.T Vs. At &T Global Network Services Circle 2(1) [India] Pvt Ltd, Vatika Triangle 3Rd Floor, Sushant Lok - I New Delhi Block A, Gurgaon Pan: Aafca 8810 L (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kanchan Kaushal, Adv Ms. Chinu Bhasin, Ca Department By : Shri H.K. Choudhary, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri Kanchan Kaushal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri H.K. Choudhary, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 153Section 234B

194C, such a deduction would not meet the requirements of section 40(a)(ia). We noted that prior to this decision the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT vs. S.K. Tekriwal 361 ITR 432 vide order dated 3rd December, 2014 taken a view by which the Hon'ble High Court dismissed the appeal of the Revenue

ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 7, NEW DELHI vs. PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15

ITA 7433/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year 2013-14 & Asstt. Year 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 36(1)(viii)Section 37

depreciation as it owns the assets and the same is put to use for business. The Revenue is dissatisfied and is in appeal in both the years. 29.2 The parties agree that this issue is covered against the Revenue by the decision of Hon’ble Delhi Court in ITA 349/2022 dated 22.09.2022 pertaining to AY 2010-11. Para

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15

ITA 2175/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year 2013-14 & Asstt. Year 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 36(1)(viii)Section 37

depreciation as it owns the assets and the same is put to use for business. The Revenue is dissatisfied and is in appeal in both the years. 29.2 The parties agree that this issue is covered against the Revenue by the decision of Hon’ble Delhi Court in ITA 349/2022 dated 22.09.2022 pertaining to AY 2010-11. Para

PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 19(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15

ITA 7273/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year 2013-14 & Asstt. Year 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 36(1)(viii)Section 37

depreciation as it owns the assets and the same is put to use for business. The Revenue is dissatisfied and is in appeal in both the years. 29.2 The parties agree that this issue is covered against the Revenue by the decision of Hon’ble Delhi Court in ITA 349/2022 dated 22.09.2022 pertaining to AY 2010-11. Para

M/S. PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15

ITA 2162/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year 2013-14 & Asstt. Year 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 36(1)(viii)Section 37

depreciation as it owns the assets and the same is put to use for business. The Revenue is dissatisfied and is in appeal in both the years. 29.2 The parties agree that this issue is covered against the Revenue by the decision of Hon’ble Delhi Court in ITA 349/2022 dated 22.09.2022 pertaining to AY 2010-11. Para

LT FOODS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6221/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Apr 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, CIT- DR
Section 142Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 80ISection 92C

194C of the Act does not apply on such payment. 103. Facts on record show that similar disallowance made in Assessment Year 2007–08 was deleted by the ld. CIT(A) and the revenue did not prefer any further appeal. 104. Steamer freight of Rs. 25,91,443/- has been paid to NORASIA Container Lines Ltd, which is a foreign

MUKUL ROHATGI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2427/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal

For Respondent: Shri Sachit Jolly, Senior Advocate
Section 112ASection 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 24Section 263

depreciation chart and Assessing Officer has accepted the ALV without verification which results in the assessment being erroneous insofar as is prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue within the meaning of Explanation 2(a) to Section 263 of the Act. Learned Counsel for the assessee stated that the Assessing Officer has specifically raised a query in regard to this

M/S. CEAR INDIA MULTITRONICS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal filed by assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 6763/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Sept 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. R.K.Panda & Smt. Beena A. Pillai

For Appellant: Sh. Sachin Jain, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Vijay Kr. Jiwani, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 14ASection 22Section 24Section 28Section 68

194C in the hands of assessee, and on the other hand invoked provisions of section 68 on such receipts. Ld.CIT (A) upheld action of Ld.AO of section 68 in respect of income earned by assessee by way of job work. 22. It is further observed that Ld.CIT (A) for disallowing expenditure, held that assessing officer rejected books of account