DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. PETRONET LNG LTD., NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavadr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 5230/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 5231/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 5232/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Petronet Lng Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of First Floor, World Trade Centre, Income Tax, Circle-19(2), Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Ita No. 4902/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 4903/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4904/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs Petronet Lng Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-19(2), First Floor, World Trade Centre, New Delhi Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Assessee By : Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.03.2021

depreciation carried forward in the year the deduction is claimed. 34. This ratio applies to ground nos. 1 & 2 of the departmental appeal for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and ground no. 1 for the assessment year 2011-12. Deduction u/s 14A: The appeal of the revenue on Rule 8D(2)(ii) The appeal of the assessee

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. PETRONET LNG LTD., NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavadr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 5230/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 5231/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 5232/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Petronet Lng Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of First Floor, World Trade Centre, Income Tax, Circle-19(2), Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Ita No. 4902/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 4903/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4904/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs Petronet Lng Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-19(2), First Floor, World Trade Centre, New Delhi Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Assessee By : Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.03.2021

depreciation carried forward in the year the deduction is claimed. 34. This ratio applies to ground nos. 1 & 2 of the departmental appeal for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and ground no. 1 for the assessment year 2011-12. Deduction u/s 14A: The appeal of the revenue on Rule 8D(2)(ii) The appeal of the assessee

PETRONET LNG LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavadr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 5230/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 5231/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 5232/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Petronet Lng Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of First Floor, World Trade Centre, Income Tax, Circle-19(2), Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Ita No. 4902/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 4903/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4904/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs Petronet Lng Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-19(2), First Floor, World Trade Centre, New Delhi Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Assessee By : Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.03.2021

depreciation carried forward in the year the deduction is claimed. 34. This ratio applies to ground nos. 1 & 2 of the departmental appeal for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and ground no. 1 for the assessment year 2011-12. Deduction u/s 14A: The appeal of the revenue on Rule 8D(2)(ii) The appeal of the assessee

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. PETRONET LNG LTD., NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavadr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 5230/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 5231/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 5232/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Petronet Lng Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of First Floor, World Trade Centre, Income Tax, Circle-19(2), Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Ita No. 4902/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 4903/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4904/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs Petronet Lng Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-19(2), First Floor, World Trade Centre, New Delhi Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Assessee By : Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.03.2021

depreciation carried forward in the year the deduction is claimed. 34. This ratio applies to ground nos. 1 & 2 of the departmental appeal for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and ground no. 1 for the assessment year 2011-12. Deduction u/s 14A: The appeal of the revenue on Rule 8D(2)(ii) The appeal of the assessee

PETRONET LNG LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavadr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 5230/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 5231/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 5232/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Petronet Lng Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of First Floor, World Trade Centre, Income Tax, Circle-19(2), Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Ita No. 4902/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 4903/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4904/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs Petronet Lng Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-19(2), First Floor, World Trade Centre, New Delhi Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Assessee By : Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.03.2021

depreciation carried forward in the year the deduction is claimed. 34. This ratio applies to ground nos. 1 & 2 of the departmental appeal for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and ground no. 1 for the assessment year 2011-12. Deduction u/s 14A: The appeal of the revenue on Rule 8D(2)(ii) The appeal of the assessee

PETRONET LNG LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavadr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 5230/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 5231/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 5232/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Petronet Lng Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of First Floor, World Trade Centre, Income Tax, Circle-19(2), Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Ita No. 4902/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 4903/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4904/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs Petronet Lng Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-19(2), First Floor, World Trade Centre, New Delhi Babar Road, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp8148D Assessee By : Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.03.2021

depreciation carried forward in the year the deduction is claimed. 34. This ratio applies to ground nos. 1 & 2 of the departmental appeal for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and ground no. 1 for the assessment year 2011-12. Deduction u/s 14A: The appeal of the revenue on Rule 8D(2)(ii) The appeal of the assessee

RELIGARE FINVEST LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 21(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, -Appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

depreciation claimed on vehicles give on finance lease requires to be deleted. Accordingly, the Ground No. 2 to 2.4 of the Assessee’s Appeal in I.T.A. No. 4796/Del/2017 are allowed. 23 ITA Nos. 4796/Del/2017 & ors. M/s Religare Finvest Ltd. Vs. DCIT Ad-hoc disallowances of support service fee and reimbursement of expenses 17. Ground No. 3

ACIT (OSD), CIRCLE- 21(1), NEW DELHI vs. RELIGARE FINVEST LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, -Appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

depreciation claimed on vehicles give on finance lease requires to be deleted. Accordingly, the Ground No. 2 to 2.4 of the Assessee’s Appeal in I.T.A. No. 4796/Del/2017 are allowed. 23 ITA Nos. 4796/Del/2017 & ors. M/s Religare Finvest Ltd. Vs. DCIT Ad-hoc disallowances of support service fee and reimbursement of expenses 17. Ground No. 3

ACIT, CIRCLE- 21(1), NEW DELHI vs. RELIGARE FINVEST LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, -Appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

depreciation claimed on vehicles give on finance lease requires to be deleted. Accordingly, the Ground No. 2 to 2.4 of the Assessee’s Appeal in I.T.A. No. 4796/Del/2017 are allowed. 23 ITA Nos. 4796/Del/2017 & ors. M/s Religare Finvest Ltd. Vs. DCIT Ad-hoc disallowances of support service fee and reimbursement of expenses 17. Ground No. 3

RELIGARE FINVEST LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 21(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, -Appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

depreciation claimed on vehicles give on finance lease requires to be deleted. Accordingly, the Ground No. 2 to 2.4 of the Assessee’s Appeal in I.T.A. No. 4796/Del/2017 are allowed. 23 ITA Nos. 4796/Del/2017 & ors. M/s Religare Finvest Ltd. Vs. DCIT Ad-hoc disallowances of support service fee and reimbursement of expenses 17. Ground No. 3

RELIGARE FINVEST LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 21(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, -Appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

depreciation claimed on vehicles give on finance lease requires to be deleted. Accordingly, the Ground No. 2 to 2.4 of the Assessee’s Appeal in I.T.A. No. 4796/Del/2017 are allowed. 23 ITA Nos. 4796/Del/2017 & ors. M/s Religare Finvest Ltd. Vs. DCIT Ad-hoc disallowances of support service fee and reimbursement of expenses 17. Ground No. 3

RELIGARE FINVEST LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 21(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, -Appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

depreciation claimed on vehicles give on finance lease requires to be deleted. Accordingly, the Ground No. 2 to 2.4 of the Assessee’s Appeal in I.T.A. No. 4796/Del/2017 are allowed. 23 ITA Nos. 4796/Del/2017 & ors. M/s Religare Finvest Ltd. Vs. DCIT Ad-hoc disallowances of support service fee and reimbursement of expenses 17. Ground No. 3

DCIT, CIRCLE- 21(1), NEW DELHI vs. RELIGARE FINVEST LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, -Appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

depreciation claimed on vehicles give on finance lease requires to be deleted. Accordingly, the Ground No. 2 to 2.4 of the Assessee’s Appeal in I.T.A. No. 4796/Del/2017 are allowed. 23 ITA Nos. 4796/Del/2017 & ors. M/s Religare Finvest Ltd. Vs. DCIT Ad-hoc disallowances of support service fee and reimbursement of expenses 17. Ground No. 3

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. DLF LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

194A. In any case, once amount decreed by Arbitral Tribunal, it is a kind of a judgment debt and overrides the provisions of Income Tax Act; and in support, he relied upon the following judgments:- 1. Islamic Investment Co. v. UOI [2004] 265 ITR 254 (Bom.) I.T.A. No.2126 & 2749/DEL/2013 16 2. Madhusudan Shrikrishna v. Emkay Exports [2010] 188 Taxman

DLF LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

194A. In any case, once amount decreed by Arbitral Tribunal, it is a kind of a judgment debt and overrides the provisions of Income Tax Act; and in support, he relied upon the following judgments:- 1. Islamic Investment Co. v. UOI [2004] 265 ITR 254 (Bom.) I.T.A. No.2126 & 2749/DEL/2013 16 2. Madhusudan Shrikrishna v. Emkay Exports [2010] 188 Taxman

HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 2(1), GURGAON

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singh

3. Addition on account of advertisement expenses – Rs.28,479,838 5 ITA No.7509/Del./2017 ITA No.7510/Del./2017 3.1 The Ld. AO and the Hon'ble DRP has erred on facts and in law in confirming a disallowance of INR 28,479,838 on an adhoc basis being 30% of total advertisement expenses of Rs.94,932,796, without appreciating that

HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 2(1), GURGAON

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singh

3. Addition on account of advertisement expenses – Rs.28,479,838 5 ITA No.7509/Del./2017 ITA No.7510/Del./2017 3.1 The Ld. AO and the Hon'ble DRP has erred on facts and in law in confirming a disallowance of INR 28,479,838 on an adhoc basis being 30% of total advertisement expenses of Rs.94,932,796, without appreciating that

ACIT, MEERUT vs. M/S. PIONEER FABRICATORS PVT. LTD., MEERUT

In the result ground No. 6 of the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri I.C.Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishiacit, Vs. Pioneer Fabricators Pvt. Ltd, Circle-2, Meerut B-2, Saraswati Industrial Estate, Partapur, Meerut Pan:Aabcp3296R (Appellant) (Respondent) Pioneer Fabricators Pvt. Ltd, Acit, Vs. B-2, Saraswati Industrial Estate, Circle-2, Meerut Pioneer Partapur, Meerut Fabricators Pvt. Ltd, Pan:Aabcp3296R B-2, Saraswati Industrial Estate, Partapur, Meerut Pan:Aabcp3296R (Appellant) (Respondent)

194A in form No. 26 AS it does not always stand correct that the assessee as interest income only should have also credited such amount. Even otherwise, mere difference in form No. 26 AS and the income shown by the assessee does not result in to an addition. However, it becomes a first trigger point for making further investigation

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL.CIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Shri O.P. Kant[Through Video Conferencing] Assessment Year: 2012-13

3 Act and the applicable Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (‘DTAA’). 7. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned CIT (A) has erred in confirming the aforesaid disallowance by alternatively alleging the IUC charges to be in the nature of ‘fees for technical services’ under the provisions of Section