BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “depreciation”+ Section 151Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai21Delhi5Visakhapatnam5Pune5Lucknow4Chennai4Hyderabad3Jaipur3Rajkot2Indore1Raipur1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 14724Section 6815Section 2505Section 1485House Property5Reassessment5Addition to Income5Natural Justice4Section 13

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1433/DEL/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2014-2015
Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

151A as envisaged\nunder the Income Tax Act, 1961, is bad in law and against the facts\nand circumstances of the case.\n\n2. That in any case and in any view of the matter, assumption of\njurisdiction u/s 147 and passing the impugned order u/s\n147/144B, is illegal, bad in law and against the facts and\ncircumstances

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 63(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1435/DEL/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2012-2013
Section 147Section 148
Section 250
Section 68

151A as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961, is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case.\n2.\nThat in any case and in any view of the matter, assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 and passing the impugned order u/s 147/144B, is illegal, bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1432/DEL/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2012-13] Sunita Bhardwaj, Vs Acit, 1/2, Taj Apartments, Circle-63(1), R.K.Puram, Sector-12, Delhi Delhi-110022. Pan-Ahfpb1928E Appellant Respondent

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

151A as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961, is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. That in any case and in any view of the matter, assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 and passing the impugned order u/s 147/144B, is illegal, bad in law and against the facts and ITA No.1435

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1434/DEL/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2012-13] Sunita Bhardwaj, Vs Acit, 1/2, Taj Apartments, Circle-63(1), R.K.Puram, Sector-12, Delhi Delhi-110022. Pan-Ahfpb1928E Appellant Respondent

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

151A as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961, is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. That in any case and in any view of the matter, assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 and passing the impugned order u/s 147/144B, is illegal, bad in law and against the facts and ITA No.1435

SUMAN KISHORE,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

ITA 1434/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Apr 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2012-13] Sunita Bhardwaj, Vs Acit, 1/2, Taj Apartments, Circle-63(1), R.K.Puram, Sector-12, Delhi Delhi-110022. Pan-Ahfpb1928E Appellant Respondent

Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

151A as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961, is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. That in any case and in any view of the matter, assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 and passing the impugned order u/s 147/144B, is illegal, bad in law and against the facts and ITA No.1435