ACIT, CC-14, NEW DELHI vs. PRAMADITYA, RAJASTHAN
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and cross objection of the assessee is allowed
ITA 1861/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2023AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2017-18 Acit, Vs Pramaditya, Cc-14, 67, Mahaveer Nagar, 2Nd Maharani Farm, New Delhi. Durgapur, Jaipur, Rajasthan – 302018. Pan: Ajppp2281E Co No.29/Del/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Pramaditya, Vs. Acit, 67, Mahaveer Nagar, Cc-14, 2Nd Maharani Farm, New Delhi. Durgapur, Jaipur, Rajasthan – 302018. Pan: Ajppp2281E
For Appellant: Shri Hiren Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT, DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 69A
condoning the delay in filing the concerned appeal(s). This aspect has been glossed over by the High
Court.
6.3. The ld. DR vehemently argued that the ld. CIT(A) simply relied on the retraction statement and affidavit of Shri Purushottam Lal Soni vis a vis assessee.
In this regard, it is pertinent to note that as already noted above