BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 43Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai25Kolkata22Mumbai9Delhi6Ahmedabad4Surat2Bangalore2Jaipur1Hyderabad1SC1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 80I8Addition to Income6Section 2504Section 143(3)4Section 80G4Section 115J4Section 92C4Deduction4Disallowance

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. K.E.I. INDUSTRIES LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, Ground No.3

ITA 1433/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini, J.M. & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, A.M.

For Appellant: Shri Satyan Sethi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Parul Singh, Sr. D.R

delay in filing the cross objection is however condoned. 17. In the result, C.O.No.34/Del./2019 of the Assessee dismissed. ITA.No.528/Del./2016 – A.Y. 2012-2013 [M/s. K.E.I. Industries Ltd., New Delhi]. 18. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-5, Delhi, Dated 23.12.2015 for the A.Y. 2012-2013. 19. Learned Counsel

M/S. KEI INDUSTRIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, Ground No.3

ITA 528/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Shri Bhavnesh Saini, J.M. & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, A.M.

2
Bench:
For Appellant: Shri Satyan Sethi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Parul Singh, Sr. D.R

delay in filing the cross objection is however condoned. 17. In the result, C.O.No.34/Del./2019 of the Assessee dismissed. ITA.No.528/Del./2016 – A.Y. 2012-2013 [M/s. K.E.I. Industries Ltd., New Delhi]. 18. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-5, Delhi, Dated 23.12.2015 for the A.Y. 2012-2013. 19. Learned Counsel

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. DCM SHRIRAM LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 927/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2025AY 2015-16
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

43A of the 1948\nAct, a contract was entered into between the assessee and the State\nElectricity Board for supply of the surplus electricity by the former to the\nlatter. The price for supply of such electricity by the assessee to the State\nElectricity Board was fixed at Rs.2.32 per unit as per the contract. This\nprice is, therefore

DCM SHRIRAM LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, DELHI

ITA 4328/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2025AY 2020-21
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

43A of the 1948\nAct, a contract was entered into between the assessee and the State\nElectricity Board for supply of the surplus electricity by the former to the\nlatter. The price for supply of such electricity by the assessee to the State\nElectricity Board was fixed at Rs.2.32 per unit as per the contract. This\nprice is, therefore

DCM SHRIRAM LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 2587/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2025AY 2018-19
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

43A of the 1948\nAct, a contract was entered into between the assessee and the State\nElectricity Board for supply of the surplus electricity by the former to the\nlatter. The price for supply of such electricity by the assessee to the State\nElectricity Board was fixed at Rs.2.32 per unit as per the contract. This\nprice is, therefore

DCM SHRIIRAM LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. NEAC, NEW DELHI

ITA 704/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2025AY 2016-17
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

43A of the 1948\nAct, a contract was entered into between the assessee and the State\nElectricity Board for supply of the surplus electricity by the former to the\nlatter. The price for supply of such electricity by the assessee to the State\nElectricity Board was fixed at Rs.2.32 per unit as per the contract. This\nprice is, therefore