BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

599 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 43clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai705Delhi599Mumbai497Kolkata293Bangalore223Ahmedabad210Jaipur185Hyderabad164Karnataka146Chandigarh141Pune131Nagpur75Surat62Indore62Amritsar59Raipur51Lucknow49Visakhapatnam39Calcutta38Cochin38Cuttack35SC26Guwahati21Rajkot20Patna19Telangana13Varanasi13Allahabad11Jodhpur10Dehradun7Panaji6Orissa5Agra5Rajasthan5Jabalpur2Himachal Pradesh1Ranchi1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income23Section 153D19Section 200A18Section 143(3)17Condonation of Delay16Section 14814Section 6813Section 234E12Section 143(1)

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result ITA No. 1364/Del/2012 for AY 2007-08 filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1364/DEL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Feb 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Kirshnan, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT DR

condoning the delay of 585 and 502 days delay in both these appeals. ACIT, Vs. Container Cooperation of India Ltd ITA No. 1555/Del/2012, 1363/Del/2012, 3960/Del/2010 and 1364/Del/2012 Assessment Year: 2006-07 and 2007-08 9. Now coming on the merits of the case we first take up the appeal of the revenue in ITA NO. 1363/Del/2012 for Assessment Year

MONICA GOLD PIPES PRIVATE LIMITED,KHASRA NO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 16(2), C R BUILDING

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3792/DEL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi

Showing 1–20 of 599 · Page 1 of 30

...
11
Section 201(1)10
Disallowance10
Deduction7
21 Aug 2024
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.3791 & 3792/Del/2023 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 11Section 119Section 119(2)(b)Section 260A

Section 253 of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Appellate Tribunal - Appeals to(Condonation of delay) - Assessment years 1994-95 and 1996-97- Whether where assessee filed appeal before Tribunal with a delay of 2984 days by taking a plea that he was wrongly advised by his Chartered Accountant earlier not to file appeal, in view of fact that assessee produced

MONICA GOLD PIPES PRIVATE LIMITED,KHASRA NO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 16(2), C R BUILDING

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3791/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.3791 & 3792/Del/2023 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

Section 11Section 119Section 119(2)(b)Section 260A

Section 253 of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Appellate Tribunal - Appeals to(Condonation of delay) - Assessment years 1994-95 and 1996-97- Whether where assessee filed appeal before Tribunal with a delay of 2984 days by taking a plea that he was wrongly advised by his Chartered Accountant earlier not to file appeal, in view of fact that assessee produced

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CR BUILDING vs. PC JEWELLER LIMITED, DELHI

In the result appeals preferred by the revenue are dismissed and the\ncross objections preferred by the assessee are allowed\nOrder pronounced in open court on 06

ITA 2581/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jun 2025AY 2015-16
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 35D

delay condone by the ld. CIT(A) is\nfound to be just and proper so as not to warrant interference. Thus this\nground of appeal preferred by the revenue is found to be devoid of any merit\nand hence dismissed.\n15. The Revenue has further raised grounds in regard to the decision\nmade by the Ld. First Appellate Authority

DCIT, CIRCLE - 19(1), DELHI vs. PC JEWELLER LIMITED, DELHI

In the result appeals preferred by the revenue are dismissed and the\ncross objections preferred by the assessee are allowed\nOrder pronounced in open court on 06

ITA 3084/DEL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jun 2025AY 2016-17
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 35D

delay condone by the ld. CIT(A) is\nfound to be just and proper so as not to warrant interference. Thus this\nground of appeal preferred by the revenue is found to be devoid of any merit\nand hence dismissed.\n15. The Revenue has further raised grounds in regard to the decision\nmade by the Ld. First Appellate Authority

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ALANKAR SAPHIRE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2607/DEL/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

M/S. ALANKAR SAPHIRE DEVELOPERS,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2277/DEL/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ALANKAR SAPHIRE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2608/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

M/S. ALANKAR SAPHIRE DEVELOPERS,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2279/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S WORLDWIDE REALTORS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2601/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. BELIEVE DEVELOPERS & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6444/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

M/S. PEGASUS SOFTECH (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2274/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S WITNESS BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 1971/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S GEE GEE BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 1975/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S VINMAN ESTATES PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 1980/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

M/S. WORLDWIDE REALTORS (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2280/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

M/S VINMAN ESTATES (P) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 1589/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

M/S. ALANKAR SAPHIRE DEVELOPERS,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2278/DEL/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S NAGESHWAR REALTORS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 1972/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S WITNESS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2603/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and deleting the addition of Rs.30,000/- and Rs.5.50 crores. 63 ITA.No.2277/Del./2016 etc., batch M/s. Alankar Saphire Developers, New Delhi. 43. The assessee in appeal challenged the additions of Rs.7 lakhs and 1 lakhs on merits. 43.1. The assessee in its appeal raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the Order