Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272A(2)(k)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai26 Pune18 Cuttack16 Cochin11 Panaji10 Lucknow8 Bangalore6 Chandigarh5 Jaipur5 Rajkot5 Ahmedabad3 Delhi3 Hyderabad3 Visakhapatnam3 Surat2 Kolkata1 Jodhpur1 Mumbai1

Key Topics

Section 234E12 Section 200A(1)4 Section 272A(2)(k)4 Penalty3 TDS3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 200A2 Section 201(1)2 Exemption2

UCO BANK, PATIALA HOUSE BRANCH,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, RANGE- 78, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 7646/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Mar 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2009-10

Section 200(3)Section 201(1)Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

condonation of delay. 6. Further, when the appeal filed by the assessee is against the imposition of penalty under section 272A(2)(k

W SERVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1027/DEL/2020[2015-16 24Q, (Q-1)]Status: Disposed

ITAT Delhi

31 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

condonation of delay, however, the ld. CIT(A) has judiciously adjudicated the issue on merits and held that since the AO has levied late fee u/s 234E only after 01.06.2015 vide intimation dated 03.04.2018, the claim of the assessee for the exemption from levy of late fee was liable to be dismissed. 3. Aggrieved the assessee filed appeal before

W SERVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1040/DEL/2020[2013-14 (26Q-Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

condonation of delay, however, the ld. CIT(A) has judiciously adjudicated the issue on merits and held that since the AO has levied late fee u/s 234E only after 01.06.2015 vide intimation dated 03.04.2018, the claim of the assessee for the exemption from levy of late fee was liable to be dismissed. 3. Aggrieved the assessee filed appeal before