SANJAY TYAGI,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6864/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6865/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6866/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6867/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6868/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6869/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6870/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6871/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6872/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6873/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6874/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Tyagi, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of C/O- Shri Sankalp Anil Sharma, Adv. Income Tax, Central C-4/129, 1St Floor, Safdarjung Circle-1, Development Area, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aeipt1282R Assessee By : Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H.K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2020

delay of 12 days which has been condoned and adjudicated on merits. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed appeal before us. 5. The brief facts of the case are that a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Surya Vinayak Group on 03.03.2011. At the same time

SANJAY TYAGI,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6864/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6865/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6866/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6867/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6868/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6869/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6870/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6871/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6872/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6873/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6874/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Tyagi, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of C/O- Shri Sankalp Anil Sharma, Adv. Income Tax, Central C-4/129, 1St Floor, Safdarjung Circle-1, Development Area, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aeipt1282R Assessee By : Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H.K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2020

delay of 12 days which has been condoned and adjudicated on merits. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed appeal before us. 5. The brief facts of the case are that a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Surya Vinayak Group on 03.03.2011. At the same time

SANJAY TYAGI,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6864/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6865/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6866/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6867/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6868/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6869/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6870/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6871/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6872/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6873/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6874/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Tyagi, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of C/O- Shri Sankalp Anil Sharma, Adv. Income Tax, Central C-4/129, 1St Floor, Safdarjung Circle-1, Development Area, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aeipt1282R Assessee By : Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H.K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2020

delay of 12 days which has been condoned and adjudicated on merits. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed appeal before us. 5. The brief facts of the case are that a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Surya Vinayak Group on 03.03.2011. At the same time

SANJAY TYAGI,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6864/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6865/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6866/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6867/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6868/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6869/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6870/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6871/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6872/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6873/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6874/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Tyagi, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of C/O- Shri Sankalp Anil Sharma, Adv. Income Tax, Central C-4/129, 1St Floor, Safdarjung Circle-1, Development Area, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aeipt1282R Assessee By : Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H.K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2020

delay of 12 days which has been condoned and adjudicated on merits. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed appeal before us. 5. The brief facts of the case are that a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Surya Vinayak Group on 03.03.2011. At the same time

SANJAY TYAGI,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6864/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6865/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6866/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6867/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6868/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6869/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6870/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6871/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6872/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6873/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6874/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Tyagi, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of C/O- Shri Sankalp Anil Sharma, Adv. Income Tax, Central C-4/129, 1St Floor, Safdarjung Circle-1, Development Area, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aeipt1282R Assessee By : Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H.K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2020

delay of 12 days which has been condoned and adjudicated on merits. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed appeal before us. 5. The brief facts of the case are that a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Surya Vinayak Group on 03.03.2011. At the same time

SANJAY TYAGI,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6864/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6865/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6866/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6867/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6868/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6869/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6870/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6871/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6872/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6873/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6874/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Tyagi, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of C/O- Shri Sankalp Anil Sharma, Adv. Income Tax, Central C-4/129, 1St Floor, Safdarjung Circle-1, Development Area, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aeipt1282R Assessee By : Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H.K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2020

delay of 12 days which has been condoned and adjudicated on merits. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed appeal before us. 5. The brief facts of the case are that a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Surya Vinayak Group on 03.03.2011. At the same time

SANJAY TYAGI,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6864/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6865/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6866/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6867/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6868/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6869/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6870/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6871/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6872/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6873/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6874/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Tyagi, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of C/O- Shri Sankalp Anil Sharma, Adv. Income Tax, Central C-4/129, 1St Floor, Safdarjung Circle-1, Development Area, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aeipt1282R Assessee By : Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H.K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2020

delay of 12 days which has been condoned and adjudicated on merits. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed appeal before us. 5. The brief facts of the case are that a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Surya Vinayak Group on 03.03.2011. At the same time

SANJAY TYAGI,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6864/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6865/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6866/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6867/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6868/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6869/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6870/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6871/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6872/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6873/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6874/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Tyagi, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of C/O- Shri Sankalp Anil Sharma, Adv. Income Tax, Central C-4/129, 1St Floor, Safdarjung Circle-1, Development Area, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aeipt1282R Assessee By : Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H.K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2020

delay of 12 days which has been condoned and adjudicated on merits. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed appeal before us. 5. The brief facts of the case are that a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Surya Vinayak Group on 03.03.2011. At the same time

SANJAY TYAGI,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6864/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6865/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6866/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6867/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6868/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6869/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6870/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6871/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6872/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 6873/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 6874/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Shri Sanjay Tyagi, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of C/O- Shri Sankalp Anil Sharma, Adv. Income Tax, Central C-4/129, 1St Floor, Safdarjung Circle-1, Development Area, New Delhi New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aeipt1282R Assessee By : Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. H.K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2020

delay of 12 days which has been condoned and adjudicated on merits. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed appeal before us. 5. The brief facts of the case are that a search u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Surya Vinayak Group on 03.03.2011. At the same time

AMIT JAIN,DELHI vs. WARD 59(5), DELHI, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

section 271B of the\nIncome-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act').\n2. Case called twice. None appears at the assessee's behest. He\nis accordingly proceeded ex-parte.\n\n3. It emerges during the course of hearing that learned\nCIT(A)/NFAC has refused to condone the delay

RAJ KUMAR WADHWA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for

Bench: Sh. Shamim Yahya & Shri Kul Bharatraj Kumar Wadhwa Vs. Ito H. No.90/38, 2Nd Floor Ward – 61(2) Malviya Nagar, New Delhi-17 New Delhi Pan No. Aabpw 0596 J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By -None- Revenue By -None- Date Of Hearing: 09.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 10.11.2023

delay in this case is condoned. In this case penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was levied

SANJEEV KUMAR GUPTA,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-56(4), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

271B of the Act alleging that assessee has not filed tax audit report in terms of provisions of Section 44AB of the Act despite the total value of transactions made in multi commodity exchange of Rs.69,17,25,042/- which far exceeds the limit prescribed for audit I.T.A. No.48/Del/2023 2 of the books of account under Section 44AB

ANIL KUMAR HUF,DELHI vs. ITO WARD 49(1), CIVIC CENTER

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Naveen Chandra

271B of Rs. 1,21,319/- needs to be deleted. 4. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend, delete or withdraw any ground at the time of hearing.” 3. The representatives of both the sides were heard at length, the case records carefully perused. 4. The ld. counsel for the assessee has filed an application praying for condonation

RAMESH KUMAR JAIN,BIJNOR vs. ITO, BAGHPAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiramesh Kumar Jain, Vs. Ito, Prop M/S. R.K. Trading Co., Railway Road, Baraut, Civil Lines, Bijnor Baghpat Pan: Afnpj3757M (Appellant) (Respondent)

condonation of delay to cooperate the department and to avoid more litigation, which was not accepted. It was not believed that notice U/s 221(1) was not served previously, without any facts, evidence, and/or material on record. Also the following case laws as referred was not considered as under:- “(1) Collector Land Acquisition & Ors V/s Mrs. Katiji

TALHA KHAN,MOHALLA AFGANAN PO AMROHA vs. ADDL.JT.DY.ACIT.NFAC, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC) DELHI

In the result, the Assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Vimal Kumara.Yr. : 2017-18 Talha Khan, Vs. National Faceless Mohalla Afganan Po Amroha, Appeal Centre (Nfac), Amroha-244221 Delhi Uttar Pradesh (Pan: Ejspk7379K) (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 271F, 271A ; 271B, 271 AAC[1], 272A[1][d] and wrongly assessed income and the head from other sources in place of business income. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that there is a delay of 71 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The reasonable cause for the same has been attributed that assessee

MANPOWERGROUP SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, DELHI , JHANDEWALAN EXTENSION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Naveen Chandra

271B and 271AA read with section 274 of the Act. 9. The Assessee prays for leave to add, alter, amend and/ or' modify any of the grounds of appeal at or before the hearing of the appeal.” 4. Ground Nos 1 to 4 pertain to the deduction u/s 80JJAA of the Act. 5. Brief facts of the issue are that

ACIT, CIRCLE-26(1), NEW DELHI vs. VAVASI TELEGANCE P.LTD, NEW DELHI

Bench: Hon’Ble N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singh(Through Video Conference)

condone a delay of 519 days in filing the appeal. Consequently, in the quantum appeal the addition on account of depreciation was not considered by me on merits. 6.6 However, given that substantial consultancy receipts were earned by the appellant through the work done by a large number of people, it is natural that the assets would have been

RAJIV JAIN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

condonation of delay of 29 days in filing and 6 days in re-filing are allowed as there is no opposition. We record that the substantial question of law was framed on 5th December, 2017. ITA 1115/2017 This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) by Rajiv Jain (hereinafter referred to as the, appellant