TARUN JAIN,FARIDABAD vs. ITO WARD 2(4) FBD, FARIDABAD
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 4193/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Nov 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmantarun Jain, Vs. Ito, Ward 2 (4), House No.641, Sector 7B, Faridabad. Faridabad – 121 006 (Haryana). (Pan : Agepj5824D) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Neeraj Goyal, Ca Revenue By : Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 11.11.2025 Date Of Order : 11.11.2025 O R D E R Per S. Rifaur Rahman: 1. The Assessee Has Filed Appeal Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A)”, For Short] Dated 28.02.2025 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. At The Time Of Hearing, Ld. Ar Of The Assessee Submitted That The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal With A Delay Of 62 Days From The Date Of Appellate Order. He Submitted That On January 7, 2025, A Robbery Took Place At The Assessee’S Shop For Which An Fir Was Registered In Sector 8, Faridabad, A Copy Of The Same Is Placed On Record & This Unfortunate Incident Caused
For Appellant: Shri Neeraj Goyal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 274
2
significant distress and disruption in the personal and professional life of the assessee. He submitted that the delay in filing the appeal was due to genuine and unavoidable circumstances beyond the assessee’s control and there was no deliberate negligence or mala fide intent on his part.
Accordingly, he prayed that the delay may be condoned and hear
