CIT vs. JETLIFE INDIA LTD

delay is condoned. The applications are disposed of ITA Nos.1276/2011 & 1277/2011 These appeals by Revenue filed under Section 260A of, the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) impugn order dated 3Ol November, 2010 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITA 1276/2011 & 1277/2011 Page 1 of 5 9 2011:DHC:11820-DB 63 (tribunal, for short) upholding the order

MOHD GULZAR,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD 63(5), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. 3. Brief facts of the case are, the assessee is an individual having income from business and filed his return of income for AY 2011-12 declaring total income of Rs.8,04,680/-. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO rejected books of account of the assessee and estimated

M/S M.D.EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,GURGAON vs. ADDL.CIT (EXEMPTION), PANCHKULA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri G.D. Agarwal & Shri Amit Shukla

delay of 11 days are condoned. 4. The facts in brief qua the levy of penalty are that, assessee is an educational society, running a school for which it has claimed exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiad). As against the ‘Nil’ return of income filed on 29.09.2010, assessment was completed u/s. 143(3) vide order dated 29.11.2012 at a ‘Nil’ income

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -7 vs. THAPER HOMES PVT. LTD.

The appeal is dismissed against the

delay of 56 days in filing the captioned appeal stands condoned. 2. The application stands disposed of. ITA 262/2025 3. The challenge in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Signed By:PRADEEP SHARMA Signing Date:18.08.2025 18:18:46 Signature Not Verified ITA 262/2025 Page 2 of 13 Act, 1961 (the Act) filed by the Revenue

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) II vs. HOME DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.

Appeal are dismissed

Bench: Issuing Notice On The Application For Condonation Of Delay, We Deem It Appropriate To Examine The Grounds Of Appeal On Merits. 3. The Respondent, A Company & Persons Associated With It, 2014:Dhc:7412-Db

condonation of delay, we deem it appropriate to examine the grounds of appeal on merits. 3. The respondent, a company and persons associated with it, 2014:DHC:7412-DB ITA 803/2014 Page 2 of 10 were subject to search and seizure operations under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) on 28th March, 2006. Notice under