BATHLINE INDIA (PVT.) LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

BATHLINE INDIA (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

ANJANI TECHNOPLAST LIMITED.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT - TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

condonation of delay and the appeal prior to amendments also did not make the imposition of late fees by Section 234

JAGDISH SINGH,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO WARD - 1(3), GHAZIABAD

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing)

Delay condoned Application ‘It is requested, to kindly provide the sufficient and reasonable time, opportunity for hearing before taking any decision” in reply filed on 21.02.2019 in continuation of reply dated 12.02.2019 against Notice dt. 28.01.2019 related to F. No. CIT(A)GZB/2018-19/1527. ii. That the Ld. CIT (A) has not considered the circumstances for not appearing before the concerning