BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 206C(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur39Chennai38Pune19Delhi16Cochin13Kolkata12Panaji10Rajkot9Dehradun8Bangalore8Jodhpur5Jaipur4Mumbai4Amritsar3Indore3Hyderabad3Ahmedabad1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 234E72Section 206C32TDS14Section 200A8Deduction8Section 200(3)6Penalty5Section 143(3)4Section 200A(1)4

W SERVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1040/DEL/2020[2013-14 (26Q-Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

6) of section 195 of the Act provide that the person referred to in section 195(1) of the Act shall furnish prescribed information. Section 195(1) of the Act provides that any person responsible for paying any interest (other than interest referred to in sections 194LB or 194LC or 194LD of the Act) or any sum chargeable

W SERVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

Addition to Income4
Condonation of Delay4
Section 2063

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1027/DEL/2020[2015-16 24Q, (Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

6) of section 195 of the Act provide that the person referred to in section 195(1) of the Act shall furnish prescribed information. Section 195(1) of the Act provides that any person responsible for paying any interest (other than interest referred to in sections 194LB or 194LC or 194LD of the Act) or any sum chargeable

SURESH KUMAR,SIRSA vs. ITO TDS, HISAR

In the result, both the appeals of the Assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 848/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri N.K. Choudhry

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M. Baranwal, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 206Section 206CSection 206C(7)Section 249(2)Section 249(3)Section 250Section 5

206C(6A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was served upon the appellant on 15-03- 2019. The appeal was required to be filed within 30 days i.e. by 14-04-2019. However, it was belatedly filed on 26-04-2019. It is seen from columns 14 & 15 of the appeal memo that it had mentioned that

SURESH KUMAR,SIRSA vs. ITO TDS, HISAR

In the result, both the appeals of the Assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 859/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri N.K. Choudhry

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M. Baranwal, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 206Section 206CSection 206C(7)Section 249(2)Section 249(3)Section 250Section 5

206C(6A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was served upon the appellant on 15-03- 2019. The appeal was required to be filed within 30 days i.e. by 14-04-2019. However, it was belatedly filed on 26-04-2019. It is seen from columns 14 & 15 of the appeal memo that it had mentioned that

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,BIJNOR vs. ITO (TDS), MORADABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7985/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Mar 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.7985/Del/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 बनाम The District Magistrate Collectorate, Ito (Tds), Vs. Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh. Moradabad. Pan No. Lkndo6243G अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 206Section 206C

condone the delay since the same got occasioned on account of bonafide reasons beyond the control of the assessee and that there is no malafide in not preferring the appeal within time. 6. BECAUSE, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT (A), sustaining the order

MS MINING OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY,PANIPAT vs. ITO WARD (TDS), KARNAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2010-11 partly allowed

ITA 5738/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Somil Agarwal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 206C

condoning the delay thereon. 3. Identical issues are involved in all these appeals and hence, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. Appeal of the assessee for AY 2010-11 is taken up as lead case. 4. The ground No. 1 raised by the assessee is challenging the action

MS MINING OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY,PANIPAT vs. ITO WARD (TDS), KARNAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2010-11 partly allowed

ITA 5736/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Dec 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Somil Agarwal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 206C

condoning the delay thereon. 3. Identical issues are involved in all these appeals and hence, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. Appeal of the assessee for AY 2010-11 is taken up as lead case. 4. The ground No. 1 raised by the assessee is challenging the action

MS MINING OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY,PANIPAT vs. ITO WARD (TDS), KARNAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2010-11 partly allowed

ITA 5737/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Dec 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Somil Agarwal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Sr. DR
Section 206C

condoning the delay thereon. 3. Identical issues are involved in all these appeals and hence, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. Appeal of the assessee for AY 2010-11 is taken up as lead case. 4. The ground No. 1 raised by the assessee is challenging the action

DREAM DESIGN AND DISPLAY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 7(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed

ITA 637/DEL/2024[2013-14 (24Q, Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Oct 2024

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Narpat Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

206C(3) as the case may be. The CPC while processing the TDS statement issued intimation / order to the assessee under Section 200A of the Act and levied late fees of different amounts computed with reference to section 234E of the Act. 5.3 The assessee challenged the action of the Assessing Officer before the CIT(A) and contended that

DREAM DESIGN AND DISPLAY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 7(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed

ITA 639/DEL/2024[2013-12 (24Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Oct 2024

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Narpat Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

206C(3) as the case may be. The CPC while processing the TDS statement issued intimation / order to the assessee under Section 200A of the Act and levied late fees of different amounts computed with reference to section 234E of the Act. 5.3 The assessee challenged the action of the Assessing Officer before the CIT(A) and contended that

DREAM DESIGN AND DISPLAY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT CRICLE 7(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed

ITA 638/DEL/2024[2013-14(24Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Oct 2024

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Narpat Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

206C(3) as the case may be. The CPC while processing the TDS statement issued intimation / order to the assessee under Section 200A of the Act and levied late fees of different amounts computed with reference to section 234E of the Act. 5.3 The assessee challenged the action of the Assessing Officer before the CIT(A) and contended that

DREAM DESIGH AND DISPLAY INDIA PVT. LTD.,,GREATER NOIDA vs. DCIT/TDS/CPC, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed

ITA 634/DEL/2024[A.Y-2013-14 (Quarter-4 TDS Statement in Form 26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Oct 2024

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Narpat Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

206C(3) as the case may be. The CPC while processing the TDS statement issued intimation / order to the assessee under Section 200A of the Act and levied late fees of different amounts computed with reference to section 234E of the Act. 5.3 The assessee challenged the action of the Assessing Officer before the CIT(A) and contended that

DREAN DESIGN AND DISPLAY INDIA PVT. LTD.,GREATER NOIDA vs. DCIT/TDS/CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed

ITA 635/DEL/2024[2013-14 (26Q, Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Oct 2024

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Narpat Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

206C(3) as the case may be. The CPC while processing the TDS statement issued intimation / order to the assessee under Section 200A of the Act and levied late fees of different amounts computed with reference to section 234E of the Act. 5.3 The assessee challenged the action of the Assessing Officer before the CIT(A) and contended that

DREAM DESIGN AND DISPLAY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,UTTAR PRADESH vs. DCIT CIRCLE 7(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed

ITA 636/DEL/2024[2013-14 (24Q, Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Oct 2024

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Narpat Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

206C(3) as the case may be. The CPC while processing the TDS statement issued intimation / order to the assessee under Section 200A of the Act and levied late fees of different amounts computed with reference to section 234E of the Act. 5.3 The assessee challenged the action of the Assessing Officer before the CIT(A) and contended that

DCIT CIRCLE 4(2), NEW DELHI vs. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, to sum up and conclude:

ITA 1038/DEL/2023[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Nov 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vijay B. Basanta, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 254Section 92C

6. We have perused the lead judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the Wipro Ltd. case. The facts which obtained, therein, are pari materia with the instant appeal. 7. We are in respectful agreement with the view taken by the Karnataka High Court in Wipro Ltd. case. The other two judgments referred to hereinabove, only follow the decision

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD,GURUGRAM vs. NEAC, DELHI

In the result, to sum up and conclude:

ITA 585/DEL/2021[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Nov 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vijay B. Basanta, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 254Section 92C

6. We have perused the lead judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the Wipro Ltd. case. The facts which obtained, therein, are pari materia with the instant appeal. 7. We are in respectful agreement with the view taken by the Karnataka High Court in Wipro Ltd. case. The other two judgments referred to hereinabove, only follow the decision