BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

216 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 200A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna466Chennai431Pune368Bangalore225Delhi216Mumbai93Nagpur41Visakhapatnam29Cochin23Karnataka21Dehradun19Surat19Hyderabad16Jaipur14Panaji10Kolkata10Indore8Lucknow8Raipur6Amritsar6Rajkot5Agra4Chandigarh4Guwahati2Ahmedabad1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 234E409Section 200A159Section 154113TDS84Section 200A(1)79Limitation/Time-bar50Rectification u/s 15431Condonation of Delay27Section 200A(1)(c)

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4374/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

Showing 1–20 of 216 · Page 1 of 11

...
26
Penalty26
Section 3(1)(b)24
Section 200A(3)22

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4376/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4367/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4373/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4371/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4375/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS P.LTD,GURGAON vs. ACIT(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4365/DEL/2018[2013-14 (24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS P.LTD,GURGAON vs. ACIT(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4364/DEL/2018[2013-14 (24Q) Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4370/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4372/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4368/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

S D SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL,AMBALA CANTT vs. ITO, TDS, KARNAL

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 7397/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4369/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

SANATAN DHARAM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,AMBALA CANTT vs. ITO, TDS, KARNAL

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 7400/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

SANATAN DHARAM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,AMBALA CANTT vs. ITO, TDS, KARNAL

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 7399/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

S D SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL,AMBALA CANTT vs. ITO, TDS, KARNAL

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 7398/DEL/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

S D SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL,AMBALA CANTT vs. ITO, TDS, KARNAL

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 7396/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS P.LTD,GURGAON vs. ACIT(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4363/DEL/2018[2013-14 (24Q) Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS P.LTD,GURGAON vs. ACIT(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4366/DEL/2018[2014-15 (24Q) Q1]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

INSTA EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all appeals of different assesses are allowed

ITA 4377/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Vp & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 2Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior