SH. RAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY,DELHI vs. ITO WARD-34(5), DELHI
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes only
ITA 3670/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Dec 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2018-19] Shri Raj Kumar Chaudhary, Income Tax Officer, C-243, Sector-3, Dsidc Ward-34(5), Indl. Area Bawana, Vs Delhi. New Delhi-11003. Pan- Aewpk1980K Assessee Revenue [Assessment Year: 2018-19] Shri Raj Kumar Chaudhary, Income Tax Officer, C-243, Sector-3, Dsidc Ward-34(5), Indl. Area Bawana, Vs Delhi. New Delhi-11003. Pan- Aewpk1980K Assessee Revenue
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 249(3)Section 271A
condonation of delay in filing of these two appeals" is not based on correct appreciation of facts on record and therefore unsustainable.
2.2That conclusion of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), New Delhi that "accordingly, appellant's all grounds of appeal are dismissed as not maintainable and thereby appellant two appeals
