Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 142A(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh17 Chennai13 Cochin11 Pune8 Delhi6 Mumbai5 Lucknow4 Bangalore4 Amritsar2 Raipur2 Kolkata2 Rajkot1 Cuttack1 Hyderabad1 Jabalpur1 Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 694 Addition to Income3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 1322 Section 153C2 Section 142A(1)2 Search & Seizure2 Limitation/Time-bar2

KINZO EXPORTS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA

In the result, appeals of Assessee are dismissed

ITA 6554/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini

For Appellant: Shri B.L. GuptaFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. D.R

Section 132Section 142A(1)Section 153C

section 142A(1) of the I.T. Act, perhaps the assessee never wanted to challenge the additions before the Ld. CIT(A). It, therefore, appears that whatever explanation have been made by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) for condonation of delay was clearly an afterthought as assessee has no merit in his appeals. It may also be noted here

KINZO EXPORTS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA

KINZO EXPORTS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA

KINZO EXPORTS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA

KINZO EXPORTS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA

SANJEEV KUMAR,BULANDSHAHR vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(2), BULANDSHAHR

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -7 vs. SUMITOMO CORPORATION INDIA (P) LTD.

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 vs. MICROSOFT INDIA ( R & D) PVT. LTD.

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 vs. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.