THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 vs. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

142A and ending with the date on which the report of the Valuation Officer is received by the Assessing Officer; or (vi) the period (not exceeding sixty days) commencing from the date on which the Assessing Officer received the declaration under sub-section (1) of Section 158-A and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section

KINZO EXPORTS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA

In the result, appeals of Assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini

section 142A(1) of the I.T. Act, perhaps the assessee never wanted to challenge the additions before the Ld. CIT(A). It, therefore, appears that whatever explanation have been made by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) for condonation of delay

KINZO EXPORTS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA

In the result, appeals of Assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini

section 142A(1) of the I.T. Act, perhaps the assessee never wanted to challenge the additions before the Ld. CIT(A). It, therefore, appears that whatever explanation have been made by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) for condonation of delay

SANJEEV KUMAR,BULANDSHAHR vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(2), BULANDSHAHR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Tribunal.

delay of 295 days in filing appeal before the Tribunal is condoned and appeal is admitted for consideration and adjudication. 6. On merits, the Ld. Counsel submitted that the Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs.18,75,000/- u/s 69 of the Act on account of cash deposited towards repayment of home loan being 75% of total cash deposit