Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

94 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai114 Chennai95 Delhi94 Kolkata94 Bangalore73 Jaipur69 Hyderabad50 Raipur45 Chandigarh31 Rajkot26 Patna21 Surat17 Pune16 Visakhapatnam16 Ahmedabad10 Nagpur8 Indore7 Lucknow7 Cuttack7 Cochin5 Kerala4 Panaji4 SC3 Jabalpur2 Jodhpur1 Karnataka1 Allahabad1 Ranchi1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 153D84 Section 153A81 Section 271(1)(b)60 Addition to Income53 Survey u/s 133A49 Section 133A47 Section 142(1)42 Section 13238 Section 201(1)

GREEN LINE EARTH LTD vs. ITO (TDS) WARD 50(5)/74(3)

Appeals are disposed of in the aforesaid

ITA/1217/2018HC Delhi16 Nov 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

condonation of delay in filing the appeal?” 3. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present appeals are that survey operation under Section 133A

GREEN LINE PUNJAB vs. ITO(TDS) WARD 50(5)/74(3)

Appeals are disposed of in the aforesaid

ITA/744/2018HC Delhi

Showing 1–20 of 94 · Page 1 of 5

33

Section 143(3)32

Condonation of Delay31

16 Nov 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

condonation of delay in filing the appeal?” 3. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present appeals are that survey operation under Section 133A

ZTE CORPORATION,CHINA vs. JCIT (OSD) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, GURGAON

ITA 1474/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2021AY 2016-17

section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”) conducted on 06.10.2009,in the office premises of ZTE Telecom India Private Limited [at 6th Floor, Tower-B, Building No. 10 Phase-II, Gurgaon, Haryana and in New Mumbai, Thane]. As per the Assessing Officer, during the course of survey proceedings, several incriminating documents were found and inventorised. Statements of various

ZTE CORPORATION,GURGAON vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), GURGAON

ITA 1930/DEL/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2021AY 2017-18

section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”) conducted on 06.10.2009,in the office premises of ZTE Telecom India Private Limited [at 6th Floor, Tower-B, Building No. 10 Phase-II, Gurgaon, Haryana and in New Mumbai, Thane]. As per the Assessing Officer, during the course of survey proceedings, several incriminating documents were found and inventorised. Statements of various

DCIT, INT. TAX.,.CIRCLE GURGAON, GURGAON vs. ZTE CORPORATION , CHINA

ITA 8185/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2021AY 2016-17

section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”) conducted on 06.10.2009,in the office premises of ZTE Telecom India Private Limited [at 6th Floor, Tower-B, Building No. 10 Phase-II, Gurgaon, Haryana and in New Mumbai, Thane]. As per the Assessing Officer, during the course of survey proceedings, several incriminating documents were found and inventorised. Statements of various

M/S. V3S INFRATECH LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 3853/DEL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Feb 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri O.P.Kant

For Appellant: Sh. Sunjay Kumar, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, Sr.DR

Section 132Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153A

delay stands condoned. 5. The brief facts of the case are that the return of income was filed for the year under consideration declaring income of Rs. 29,041/- on 01.11.2004. There was a search and seizure action u/s 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to call ‘the Act’) on 01.09.2005. Assessment was framed u/s 153A/143

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S DELCO INDIA PVT. LTD.

ITA/917/2015HC Delhi10 Feb 2016

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

Section 133Section 133(6)Section 148Section 260A

delay in filing and in re filing the appeals is condoned. 2. ,The applications stand disposed of. ITA 116/2016 ITA 917/2015 ITA 74/2016 3. These appeals have been preferred by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the 'Act') against a common order dated 16 : June, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereafter

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S DELCO INDIA PVT. LTD

ITA/116/2016HC Delhi10 Feb 2016

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

Section 133Section 133(6)Section 148Section 260A

delay in filing and in re filing the appeals is condoned. 2. ,The applications stand disposed of. ITA 116/2016 ITA 917/2015 ITA 74/2016 3. These appeals have been preferred by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the 'Act') against a common order dated 16 : June, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereafter

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 356/DEL/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 355/DEL/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 364/DEL/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 360/DEL/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI ,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 , DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 359/DEL/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 362/DEL/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 365/DEL/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 357/DEL/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 363/DEL/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 361/DEL/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

PUSHPA RANI,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 358/DEL/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

Section 153Section 153A

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2 | P a g e ITA No.365/Del/2022 [Assessment Year : 2007-08] [QUANTUM PROCEEDINGS] 5. First, we take up ITA No. 365/Del/2022 filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year : 2007-08. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- Ground No.1 “The Honourable

M/S. THE COOPERATIVE COMPANY LTD.,UTTAR PRADESH vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

Appeals are allowed

ITA 4193/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2021AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Sahil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Pramita M Biswas, CIT(DR)

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153C

condone the delay in filing the present appeal and admit the same. 6.0 Shri Salil Kapoor, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Assessee, at the outset, relied upon the order passed Co- ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Mohan Meakin Ltd. vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax in ITA No. 3787/Del/2008 & ITA No. 1713/Del/ 2012 The Cooperative