BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

952 results for “condonation of delay”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,436Mumbai1,386Delhi952Pune751Kolkata586Ahmedabad528Jaipur451Bangalore402Hyderabad367Chandigarh244Surat241Cochin241Indore185Karnataka175Lucknow158Raipur154Nagpur153Visakhapatnam141Cuttack132Rajkot118Amritsar94Patna75Agra63Calcutta54Guwahati52Panaji31Ranchi31Allahabad30Dehradun29SC27Jabalpur25Jodhpur20Varanasi13Telangana12Orissa4Punjab & Haryana2Himachal Pradesh2Rajasthan1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 234E147Penalty60Section 271(1)(c)59Section 15458Section 200A50Addition to Income43Section 200A(1)29Condonation of Delay29Section 147

ACIT, CC-14, DELHI vs. LAKSHYA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 181/DEL/2021[2005-06]Status: HeardITAT Delhi22 Jan 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

For Appellant: Shri Lalit Mohan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty, CIT- DR
Section 153ASection 253Section 5

delay condonation application is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal also stands dismissed as time barred. 12. For the sake of completeness, even on merits, the appeal of the Revenue has no legs to stand. The basis of the addition reads as under: “During the year the assessee had given advance of Rs.3,28,OO,000/- as advance to six companies

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

Showing 1–20 of 952 · Page 1 of 48

...
28
TDS26
Limitation/Time-bar21
Section 6820

In the result ITA No. 1364/Del/2012 for AY 2007-08 filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1364/DEL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Feb 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Kirshnan, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT DR

condoning the delay of 585 and 502 days delay in both these appeals. ACIT, Vs. Container Cooperation of India Ltd ITA No. 1555/Del/2012, 1363/Del/2012, 3960/Del/2010 and 1364/Del/2012 Assessment Year: 2006-07 and 2007-08 9. Now coming on the merits of the case we first take up the appeal of the revenue in ITA NO. 1363/Del/2012 for Assessment Year

SH. RAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY,DELHI vs. ITO WARD-34(5), DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 3671/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2018-19] Shri Raj Kumar Chaudhary, Income Tax Officer, C-243, Sector-3, Dsidc Ward-34(5), Indl. Area Bawana, Vs Delhi. New Delhi-11003. Pan- Aewpk1980K Assessee Revenue [Assessment Year: 2018-19] Shri Raj Kumar Chaudhary, Income Tax Officer, C-243, Sector-3, Dsidc Ward-34(5), Indl. Area Bawana, Vs Delhi. New Delhi-11003. Pan- Aewpk1980K Assessee Revenue

Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 249(3)Section 271A

condoning the delay for both the appeals (the delay in respect of penalty appeal was of 64 days) is reproduced

SH. RAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY,DELHI vs. ITO WARD-34(5), DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 3670/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2018-19] Shri Raj Kumar Chaudhary, Income Tax Officer, C-243, Sector-3, Dsidc Ward-34(5), Indl. Area Bawana, Vs Delhi. New Delhi-11003. Pan- Aewpk1980K Assessee Revenue [Assessment Year: 2018-19] Shri Raj Kumar Chaudhary, Income Tax Officer, C-243, Sector-3, Dsidc Ward-34(5), Indl. Area Bawana, Vs Delhi. New Delhi-11003. Pan- Aewpk1980K Assessee Revenue

Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 249(3)Section 271A

condoning the delay for both the appeals (the delay in respect of penalty appeal was of 64 days) is reproduced

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SHINE STAR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 3456/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

M/S ASHUTOSH DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6358/DEL/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. LKG BUILDERS P. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 121/DEL/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S LAKSHYA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,, GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6433/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. KING BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 3501/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. LKG BUILDERS P. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 118/DEL/2017[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. ASHUTOSH DEVELOPERS P. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 122/DEL/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. M.M. BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 3449/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

M/S LKG BUILDERS (P) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6354/DEL/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S KING BUILDCON PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 3460/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. LKG BUILDERS P. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 119/DEL/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

M/S LKG BUILDERS (P) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6353/DEL/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S LAKSHYA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,, GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6431/DEL/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S LAKSHYA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,, GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6432/DEL/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

M/S. PEGASUS SOFTECH (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2274/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. BELIEVE DEVELOPERS & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6444/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

condoned. 13. On the other hand, Learned Counsel for the Assessee reiterated the submissions made before Ld. CIT(A) and submitted that delay was due to the above reasons and that penalty