BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

342 results for “charitable trust”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai524Karnataka347Delhi342Bangalore237Chennai211Ahmedabad112Jaipur108Kolkata88Hyderabad66Pune65Chandigarh58Cochin44Lucknow32Cuttack30Indore26Surat24Visakhapatnam23Telangana16Allahabad11Jodhpur10Agra9Amritsar8Rajkot8SC8Raipur7Patna7Nagpur7Varanasi6Ranchi4Punjab & Haryana3Jabalpur2Dehradun2Guwahati2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1Orissa1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 12A152Section 1180Addition to Income49Exemption49Section 69A35Section 143(3)33Section 2(15)31Section 13227Section 143(1)27

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. ANIKA INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.,

ITA/99/2018HC Delhi31 Jan 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

Section 32Section 80G

set aside and Rs.50,37,552/- deposited with the Registrar General of this court as per interim order, along with the interest accrued thereon be directed to be released to the appellant. 13. The learned counsel for the respondent has refuted the appellant‟s contentions. He says that the finding of the learned Single Judge are correct and sound

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, NOIDA, NOIDA vs. SARASWATI AMMAL EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST, CHENNAI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2291/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Showing 1–20 of 342 · Page 1 of 18

...
Disallowance26
Section 37(1)25
Charitable Trust24
Section 132
Section 133A
Section 142
Section 144
Section 153
Section 153C
Section 69A
Section 69C

Trust. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in confirming the provisions of sections 69A and 69C, as the provisions of Chapter VI "Aggregation of income and set-off or carry-forward of loss" are not applicable in the case of a charitable

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NOIDA vs. SARASWATI AMMAL EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST, CHENNAI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2289/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

Trust. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in confirming the provisions of sections 69A and 69C, as the provisions of Chapter VI "Aggregation of income and set-off or carry-forward of loss" are not applicable in the case of a charitable

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , NOIDA vs. SARASWATI AMMAL EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST, , CHENNAI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2288/DEL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

Trust. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in confirming the provisions of sections 69A and 69C, as the provisions of Chapter VI "Aggregation of income and set-off or carry-forward of loss" are not applicable in the case of a charitable

SARASWATHI AMMAL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CENTRE CIRCLE II, NOIDA

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2181/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

Trust. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in confirming the provisions of sections 69A and 69C, as the provisions of Chapter VI "Aggregation of income and set-off or carry-forward of loss" are not applicable in the case of a charitable

NATASHA CHOPRA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 16(1), DELHI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2290/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Delhi03 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

Trust. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in confirming the provisions of sections 69A and 69C, as the provisions of Chapter VI "Aggregation of income and set-off or carry-forward of loss" are not applicable in the case of a charitable

NATASHA CHOPRA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-16(1), DELHI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2291/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Delhi03 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

Trust. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in confirming the provisions of sections 69A and 69C, as the provisions of Chapter VI "Aggregation of income and set-off or carry-forward of loss" are not applicable in the case of a charitable

GIAN SAGAR EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-27, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6054/DEL/2018[-]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Sept 2020

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumar(E-Court Module) Ita No. 6054/Del./2018 : Asstt. Year : Gian Sagar Educational & Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Charitable Trust, Flat No. 509, Tax, Central Circle-27, 5Th Floor, Indraprakash Building, New Delhi Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaatg5827B Assessee By : Sh. Amol Sinha, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Sunita Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 28.08.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 03.09.2020

For Appellant: Sh. Amol Sinha, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

Charitable Trust xiii) To set up and run or assist the setting up and running of Adult education centres and coaching centers for moral upliftment, educational skills towards self reliance. xiv) To grant stipend, scholarships or any other assistance or otherwise to deserving students or scholars in the field of education with special emphasis on the following specialties Medicine, Pharmacy

BHAGWANT SINGH CHARITABLE TRUST,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT(EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 6920/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. A. K. Batra, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Kanv Bali, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(c)Section 164(2)Section 2(15)

losses or damages, sustained by it due to such rescinding of the agreement. ROPRIETORY INFORMATION 1. RPSS undertakes all times, during the term of the agreement and after the expiry of the same to hold in strictest confidence, and not to use, except for the benefit of BSCT, or to disclose to any person, firm or 18 Bhagwant Singh Charitable

M/S GIAN SAGAR EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3801/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri M. Balaganeshm/S. Gian Sagar Educational Vs. Dcit & Charitable Trust, Central Circle-29, Sco 10-110, Sector 43B, New Delhi Chandigarh (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aaatg5827B

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Pratap Mall, AdvFor Respondent: Md. Gayasuddin Ansari, CIT DR
Section 115Section 115BSection 133(6)

Charitable Trust 11,60,77,000/- with following observations and findings in para 5.7 of first appellate order which as follows:- “5.7 I have carefully considered assessment order, written submissions, case laws relied upon and oral arguments of Ld. AR. The objections/arguments of the appellant are discussed as under:- (i) During the appellate proceedings, it has been submitted

DCIT (EXEMPTION), GHAZIABAD vs. OM CHARITABLE TRUST, MEERUT

In the result, Cross Objection of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4961/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Jan 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2011-12

Section 11(5)(x)Section 12A

Charitable Trust 2. That the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that income has to be computed commercially even in cases covered u/s 11-13 of the Act and resultant loss, if any, arising due to surplus application of income, has to be computed and carried forward to next year to be set

ITO (E), WARD- 2(2), NEW DELHI vs. SHRI SWAMI SATYANAND DHARMARTH TRUST, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2468/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Shri O.P. Kant[Through Video Conferencing] Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 70

set-ff of excess deficit pertaining to earlier years without appreciating the fact that the scheme of taxation of charitable or religious trust/institution as codified u/s 11, 12 and 13 there is no provision for computing loss from property held under trust/institution on account of excess application of income/funds of the trust

HEIDELBERG CEMENT INDIA LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2 , GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 5823/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharmaheidelberg Cement India Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 9Th Floor, Tower-C, Infinity Circle-2, Towers, Dlf, Cybercity, Gurgaon Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aabcm2359J

For Appellant: Shri Harpreet Singh Ajmani, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Waseem Arshad, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 71Section 74

trust and in confidence for Honda by the respondent assessee. This information was not to be divulged, communicated or made known to third persons in any manner whatsoever, except as expressly provided. Respondent was to take all necessary precautions to keep the said information secret and confidential and restrict its use strictly as per the first as well

GIAN SUGAR EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST (REGD.),CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, ITA.No.4692/Del

ITA 4692/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Oct 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Shailesh Gupta, C.A. And Shri Ravi Pratap Mall, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT-DR
Section 115Section 115BSection 12ASection 13(7)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263Section 68

set off of losses of Rs.6,23,15,329/- Thereafter, an application was made by the assessee-trust under section 154 of the I.T. Act, 1961 on 03.01.2011 seeking allowance of deduction on account of further 3 ITA.No.4775 & 4692/Del./2015 M/s. Gian Sagar Educational and Charitable

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. GIAN SAGAR EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST (REGD.), CHANDIGARH

In the result, ITA.No.4692/Del

ITA 4775/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Oct 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Shailesh Gupta, C.A. And Shri Ravi Pratap Mall, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT-DR
Section 115Section 115BSection 12ASection 13(7)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263Section 68

set off of losses of Rs.6,23,15,329/- Thereafter, an application was made by the assessee-trust under section 154 of the I.T. Act, 1961 on 03.01.2011 seeking allowance of deduction on account of further 3 ITA.No.4775 & 4692/Del./2015 M/s. Gian Sagar Educational and Charitable

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHANKAR TRADING CO. P. LTD.

The appeals stand disposed of

ITA - 361 / 2008HC Delhi09 Jul 2012
For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra and Ms Kavita JhaFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal and Ms Suruchi Aggarwal
Section 201

set of persons and/or their family members, it can hardly be disputed that the assessee Company could have continued with the lease, so long as it was in the financial interest of the Company to continue with the arrangement it had with the Trust. Considering the close connection between the assessee and the trust, resulting in common control of both

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHANKAR TRADING CO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of

ITA - 1183 / 2010HC Delhi09 Jul 2012
For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra and Ms Kavita JhaFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal and Ms Suruchi Aggarwal
Section 201

set of persons and/or their family members, it can hardly be disputed that the assessee Company could have continued with the lease, so long as it was in the financial interest of the Company to continue with the arrangement it had with the Trust. Considering the close connection between the assessee and the trust, resulting in common control of both

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III vs. M/S SHANKAR TRADING CO.P.LTD

The appeals stand disposed of

ITA - 1207 / 2005HC Delhi09 Jul 2012
For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra and Ms Kavita JhaFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal and Ms Suruchi Aggarwal
Section 201

set of persons and/or their family members, it can hardly be disputed that the assessee Company could have continued with the lease, so long as it was in the financial interest of the Company to continue with the arrangement it had with the Trust. Considering the close connection between the assessee and the trust, resulting in common control of both

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III vs. SHANKAR TRADING CO. P.LTD.

The appeals stand disposed of

ITA - 482 / 2008HC Delhi09 Jul 2012
For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra and Ms Kavita JhaFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal and Ms Suruchi Aggarwal
Section 201

set of persons and/or their family members, it can hardly be disputed that the assessee Company could have continued with the lease, so long as it was in the financial interest of the Company to continue with the arrangement it had with the Trust. Considering the close connection between the assessee and the trust, resulting in common control of both

C.I.T vs. SHANKAR TRADING CO. PVT LTD

The appeals stand disposed of

ITA - 731 / 2008HC Delhi09 Jul 2012
For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra and Ms Kavita JhaFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal and Ms Suruchi Aggarwal
Section 201

set of persons and/or their family members, it can hardly be disputed that the assessee Company could have continued with the lease, so long as it was in the financial interest of the Company to continue with the arrangement it had with the Trust. Considering the close connection between the assessee and the trust, resulting in common control of both