BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

381 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 54clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka457Delhi381Mumbai292Chennai132Bangalore126Ahmedabad90Jaipur88Hyderabad83Pune76Chandigarh55Kolkata42Lucknow39Cochin30Amritsar26Indore25Visakhapatnam22Cuttack19Calcutta17Allahabad13Agra12Telangana10Surat8Nagpur8Rajkot7Jodhpur6Kerala5SC5Varanasi4Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana2Raipur1Dehradun1Patna1Orissa1Guwahati1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 12A81Exemption64Addition to Income46Section 1139Section 69A32Section 143(3)31Section 234E28Section 14724Charitable Trust24

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NOIDA vs. SARASWATI AMMAL EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST, CHENNAI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2289/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

trust. Both the above said parties have initially stated that they had received money from Tukaram Patil and others, but later retracted it. In any case, no contra entry was available in the record maintained by Shri TukaramPatil. Further, the revenue did not examine Tukaram Patil with regard to the entries of receipt of cash noted by Taruna Maheswari

Showing 1–20 of 381 · Page 1 of 20

...
Section 2(15)23
Section 1023
Disallowance16

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, NOIDA, NOIDA vs. SARASWATI AMMAL EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST, CHENNAI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2291/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

trust. Both the above said parties have initially stated that they had received money from Tukaram Patil and others, but later retracted it. In any case, no contra entry was available in the record maintained by Shri TukaramPatil. Further, the revenue did not examine Tukaram Patil with regard to the entries of receipt of cash noted by Taruna Maheswari

SARASWATHI AMMAL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CENTRE CIRCLE II, NOIDA

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2181/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

trust. Both the above said parties have initially stated that they had received money from Tukaram Patil and others, but later retracted it. In any case, no contra entry was available in the record maintained by Shri TukaramPatil. Further, the revenue did not examine Tukaram Patil with regard to the entries of receipt of cash noted by Taruna Maheswari

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , NOIDA vs. SARASWATI AMMAL EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST, , CHENNAI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2288/DEL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

trust. Both the above said parties have initially stated that they had received money from Tukaram Patil and others, but later retracted it. In any case, no contra entry was available in the record maintained by Shri TukaramPatil. Further, the revenue did not examine Tukaram Patil with regard to the entries of receipt of cash noted by Taruna Maheswari

NATASHA CHOPRA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 16(1), DELHI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2290/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Delhi03 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

trust. Both the above said parties have initially stated that they had received money from Tukaram Patil and others, but later retracted it. In any case, no contra entry was available in the record maintained by Shri TukaramPatil. Further, the revenue did not examine Tukaram Patil with regard to the entries of receipt of cash noted by Taruna Maheswari

NATASHA CHOPRA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-16(1), DELHI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 2291/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Delhi03 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 144Section 153Section 153CSection 69ASection 69C

trust. Both the above said parties have initially stated that they had received money from Tukaram Patil and others, but later retracted it. In any case, no contra entry was available in the record maintained by Shri TukaramPatil. Further, the revenue did not examine Tukaram Patil with regard to the entries of receipt of cash noted by Taruna Maheswari

ACIT (EXEMPTION), GHAZIABAD vs. M/S. DIVYA YOG MANDIR TRUST,, HARIDWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 745/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Apr 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishia Y 2010-11 Acit (Exemption) Vs Divya Yog Mandir Trust Circle, Cgo-1 Kripalu Bag, Hapur Road, Kankhal, Haridwar Ghaziabad (Pan Aaatd1114E) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Ms. Sunita Singh, CIT DRFor Respondent: Sh. Rohit Jain, Advocate
Section 11Section 12Section 143Section 2(15)

section 11 also exempts income tax of a business carried on by the trust so long as the business carried on by the trust is (a) incidental to the attainment of main objects (b) feeds the charitable objects (c) separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of the same, even on fulfillment of the aforesaid conditions profit from such

PATANJALI YOGPEETH (NYAS),DELHI vs. ADIT(EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 2267/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri L. P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv.; &For Respondent: Shri N. C. Swain, CIT [DR]
Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(5)Section 13Section 142Section 2(15)

section 40(a)(ia) of the Act; (b) Addition of Rs. 1,00,000 on account of alleged donation to Gurukul Amsena (c) Addition of Rs.5,54,123 on account of alleged discrepancies in the books of the appellant. 17. That the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in confirming addition of Rs.1

DCIT (EXEMPTION), GHAZIABAD vs. M/S. DIVYA YOG MANDIR TRUST, HARIDWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 779/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit(Exemptions), Divya Yog Mandir Trust, Room No. 105, 1St Floor, Kripalu Bagh, Cgo-Ii, Vs Kankhal, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Haridwar. Ghaziabad. (Pan: Aaatd1114E) Appellant Respondent Department By: Ms Nidhi Srivastava, C.I.T. Dr Assessee By: Shri Rohti Jain, Advocate Date Of Hearing: 29.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 31.07.2019 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Rohti Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms nidhi Srivastava, C.I.T. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 43B

section 11 also exempts income tax of a business carried on by the trust so long as the business carried on by the trust is (a) incidental to the attainment of main objects (b) feeds the charitable objects (c) separate books of accounts are maintained in respect of the same, even on fulfillment of the aforesaid conditions profit from such

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. GIAN SAGAR EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST (REGD.), CHANDIGARH

In the result, ITA.No.4692/Del

ITA 4775/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Oct 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Shailesh Gupta, C.A. And Shri Ravi Pratap Mall, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT-DR
Section 115Section 115BSection 12ASection 13(7)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263Section 68

Charitable Trust (Regd.), Chandigarh. application of income to the extent of Rs.68,54,03,834/- made by the assessee-trust in acquiring fixed assets. The said claim was accepted vide order passed under section

GIAN SUGAR EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST (REGD.),CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, ITA.No.4692/Del

ITA 4692/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Oct 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Shailesh Gupta, C.A. And Shri Ravi Pratap Mall, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT-DR
Section 115Section 115BSection 12ASection 13(7)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263Section 68

Charitable Trust (Regd.), Chandigarh. application of income to the extent of Rs.68,54,03,834/- made by the assessee-trust in acquiring fixed assets. The said claim was accepted vide order passed under section

SUNSHINE EDUCATIONAL & DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. ADDL. CIT, EXEMPTION, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4727/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Delhi16 Dec 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Garg, CAFor Respondent: Shri H.K. Chaudhary, CIT DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 194Section 2(15)Section 251(2)Section 40

54,59,283/- thereby showing loss of Rs.16,36,008/- in this account. According to the AO, the assessee has disclosed the hostel fees and expenses in its composite income & expenditure account and has not made separate books of account as required under section 11(4A). According to the assessee, the hostel facility was treated as charitable activities connected with

CONFRERE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4464/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Anubhav Sharma

Section 12ASection 250Section 251Section 56

Section 11 to assessee society has held that, since imparting of education is a matter of pure charity, therefore, the educational institution is not permitted to receive or recover the cost of charity from its beneficiary by way of fees, i.e., charging of fees itself would amount uncharitable activity. We are unable to subscribe to this proposition at all, because

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, EXEMPTIONS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 165/DEL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, C. A.;&For Respondent: Shri Govind Singhal, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 2(15)Section 251Section 251(1)Section 251(2)

54). c) That the learned CIT (A) has wrongly interpreted the judgment of Five judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Isamic Academy of Education &Anr Vs. State of Karnataka &Ors and interpreted that no Charitable Society can charge fee from its students in the course of providing education

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, EXEMPTIONS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 168/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, C. A.;&For Respondent: Shri Govind Singhal, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 2(15)Section 251Section 251(1)Section 251(2)

54). c) That the learned CIT (A) has wrongly interpreted the judgment of Five judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Isamic Academy of Education &Anr Vs. State of Karnataka &Ors and interpreted that no Charitable Society can charge fee from its students in the course of providing education

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, EXEMPTIONS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 166/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, C. A.;&For Respondent: Shri Govind Singhal, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 2(15)Section 251Section 251(1)Section 251(2)

54). c) That the learned CIT (A) has wrongly interpreted the judgment of Five judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Isamic Academy of Education &Anr Vs. State of Karnataka &Ors and interpreted that no Charitable Society can charge fee from its students in the course of providing education

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, EXEMPTION RANGE, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 6051/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, C. A.;&For Respondent: Shri Govind Singhal, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 2(15)Section 251Section 251(1)Section 251(2)

54). c) That the learned CIT (A) has wrongly interpreted the judgment of Five judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Isamic Academy of Education &Anr Vs. State of Karnataka &Ors and interpreted that no Charitable Society can charge fee from its students in the course of providing education

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, EXEMPTIONS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 167/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, C. A.;&For Respondent: Shri Govind Singhal, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 2(15)Section 251Section 251(1)Section 251(2)

54). c) That the learned CIT (A) has wrongly interpreted the judgment of Five judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Isamic Academy of Education &Anr Vs. State of Karnataka &Ors and interpreted that no Charitable Society can charge fee from its students in the course of providing education

ACIT, MEERUT vs. M/S. SPACE AGE RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST, MEERUT

In the result Ground No. 1 and 3 of the appeal of the revenue is allowed and ground No

ITA 4622/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 May 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishiacit, Space Age Research & Vs. Circle-2, Meerut Technology Foundation, Charitable Trust, Railway Road, Meerut Pan: Aabts7321M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjeev Sapra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. SS Rana, CIT DR
Section 13(2)Section 13(3)Section 68

Charitable Trust, Meerut is siphoning the found of the society by misappropriation of accounts by way of making advance payment under the head of construction of buildings. Here also there is clear-cut of violation the provision of section 13(2) of IT. Further it is also clear that construction of building can not be allowed as application because construction

M/S. BHAI HOSPITAL TRUST,NEW DELHI vs. DIT (EXEMPTIONS), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4147/DEL/2011[]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Jun 2021

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Kul Bharatassessment Year : Nil M/S. Bhai Hospital Trust, Dit(Exemption), 54, Janpath, Vs Plot No.15, 3Rd Floor, Connaught Place, Aayakar Bhawan, Laxmi New Delhi-110001. Nagar, District Centre, Pan-Aaatb0492M New Delhi-110092. Appellant Respondent Appellant By Sh. Tarandeep Singh, Adv. & Sh. Pulkit Verma, Adv. Respondent By Sh. Satpal Gulati, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 05.05.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 18.06.2021

Section 10Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 2(15)

54, Janpath, Vs Plot No.15, 3rd Floor, Connaught Place, Aayakar Bhawan, Laxmi New Delhi-110001. Nagar, District Centre, PAN-AAATB0492M New Delhi-110092. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Sh. Tarandeep Singh, Adv. & Sh. Pulkit Verma, Adv. Respondent by Sh. Satpal Gulati, CIT DR Date of Hearing 05.05.2021 Date of Pronouncement 18.06.2021 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM : This appeal filed