JINDAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY,DELHI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-3, DELHI

In the result, the assessees‟ appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshlala Sher Singh Memorial Vs. Pcit(Central)-3, Jeevan Vigyan Trust Society, Jhandewalan, New Plot No. 18, Sector-22, Phase-1, Delhi Dwarka, Delhi-110075 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaal2241H Jindal Charitable Society, Vs. Pcit(Central)-3, Ps-2, C-3, Block, Phase-Ii, Jhandewalan, New Ashok Vihar, Delhi- 110052 Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaatj0588L Florence Nighingale Vs. Pcit(Central)-3, Educational Society, Jhandewalan, New Sector-16B, Phase-I, Haf Delhi Pocket-A, Sector-22, Delhi- 110075 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaaf1097R

Trust Society Jindal Charitable Society Florence Nighingale Educational Society 12AB(2) of the Act provides that the pending td applications under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 12AA before the date on which section 12AB came into force shall be deemed to be applications made under sub-clause (4

FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,DELHI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-3, DELHI

In the result, the assessees‟ appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshlala Sher Singh Memorial Vs. Pcit(Central)-3, Jeevan Vigyan Trust Society, Jhandewalan, New Plot No. 18, Sector-22, Phase-1, Delhi Dwarka, Delhi-110075 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaal2241H Jindal Charitable Society, Vs. Pcit(Central)-3, Ps-2, C-3, Block, Phase-Ii, Jhandewalan, New Ashok Vihar, Delhi- 110052 Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaatj0588L Florence Nighingale Vs. Pcit(Central)-3, Educational Society, Jhandewalan, New Sector-16B, Phase-I, Haf Delhi Pocket-A, Sector-22, Delhi- 110075 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaaaf1097R

Trust Society Jindal Charitable Society Florence Nighingale Educational Society 12AB(2) of the Act provides that the pending td applications under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 12AA before the date on which section 12AB came into force shall be deemed to be applications made under sub-clause (4

LAKHMI CHAND CHARITABLE SOCIETY,NEW DELHI vs. PCIT CENTRAL 3, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Ms.Madhumita Roylakhmi Chand Vs. Principal Commissioner Charitable Society, Of Income Tax, Central-3 Elephanta Lane, Behind Room No. 325, 3Rd Floor, Sector-10/6 Market, New Income Tax Building, E-3 Golak Dham, Sector-10, Ara Centre, Jhandewalan Dwarka, Extension, New Delhi - 110075 New Delhi - 110055

4) in section 12AB of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (the Act) allowing the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Income-tax to examine if there is any "specified violation" by the trust or institution registered or provisionally registered under the relevant clauses of sub-section (1) of section 12AB or sub- section (1) of section 12AA. Subsequent to examination

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JAMNALAL BAJAJ FOUNDATION

charitable trusts, the surplus accumulated under section 11(2) of the Act as discussed above got utilized to the extent of Rs. 20 Crores. Thus, the provisions of Section 11(3)(c)/11 (3)(d) of the Act got attracted. 4. In view of the above, our client has complied a Revised Return of Income and a Revised Statement

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JAMNALAL BAJAJ FOUNDATION

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

charitable trusts, the surplus accumulated under section 11(2) of the Act as discussed above got utilized to the extent of Rs. 20 Crores. Thus, the provisions of Section 11(3)(c)/11 (3)(d) of the Act got attracted. 4. In view of the above, our client has complied a Revised Return of Income and a Revised Statement

CIT vs. MEHTA CHARITABLE PRAJNALAYA TRUST

Inasmuch as all that is required is for the settler of the trust to declare that the

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR

charitable purposes within the meaning of the substantive clause of section 4(3)." Thus, if a property is held under trust, and such property is a business, the case would fall under Section 11(4) and not under Section 1

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS vs. MEHTA CHARITABLE PRAJNALAY TRUST

Inasmuch as all that is required is for the settler of the trust to declare that the

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR

charitable purposes within the meaning of the substantive clause of section 4(3)." Thus, if a property is held under trust, and such property is a business, the case would fall under Section 11(4) and not under Section 1

CIT vs. MEHTA CHARITABLE PRAJNALAYA TRUST

Inasmuch as all that is required is for the settler of the trust to declare that the

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR

charitable purposes within the meaning of the substantive clause of section 4(3)." Thus, if a property is held under trust, and such property is a business, the case would fall under Section 11(4) and not under Section 1

CIT vs. MEHTA CHARITABLE PRAJNALAYA TRUST

Inasmuch as all that is required is for the settler of the trust to declare that the

charitable purposes within the meaning of the substantive clause of section 4(3)." Thus, if a property is held under trust, and such property is a business, the case would fall under Section 11(4) and not under Section 1

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MEHTA CHARITABLE PRAJNALAY TRUST

Inasmuch as all that is required is for the settler of the trust to declare that the

charitable purposes within the meaning of the substantive clause of section 4(3)." Thus, if a property is held under trust, and such property is a business, the case would fall under Section 11(4) and not under Section 1

CIT vs. MEHTA CHARITABLE PRAJNALAYA TRUST

Inasmuch as all that is required is for the settler of the trust to declare that the

charitable purposes within the meaning of the substantive clause of section 4(3)." Thus, if a property is held under trust, and such property is a business, the case would fall under Section 11(4) and not under Section 1

NATHANEIL JUNIOR EDUCATION SOCIETY,DELHI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) - 3 , DELHI

In the result, the assessees’ appeals are allowed

trusts/ societies for personal use and unexplained investments. The cases belonging to Smt Sudha Gupta and Shri Devendra Gupta group including the assessee were centralized to Central Circle 29 from Circle (Exemptions) 1(1), Delhi vide order passed under Section 127 of the Act dated 15-11- 2022. The learned assessing officer i.e. Central Circle 29 Delhi was Page

DIVINE EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,DELHI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) - 3, DELHI

In the result, the assessees’ appeals are allowed

trusts/ societies for personal use and unexplained investments. The cases belonging to Smt Sudha Gupta and Shri Devendra Gupta group including the assessee were centralized to Central Circle 29 from Circle (Exemptions) 1(1), Delhi vide order passed under Section 127 of the Act dated 15-11- 2022. The learned assessing officer i.e. Central Circle 29 Delhi was Page

SHRI NARENDRA CHARITABLE TRUST,DELHI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) - 3, DELHI

In the result, the assessees’ appeals are allowed

trusts/ societies for personal use and unexplained investments. The cases belonging to Smt Sudha Gupta and Shri Devendra Gupta group including the assessee were centralized to Central Circle 29 from Circle (Exemptions) 1(1), Delhi vide order passed under Section 127 of the Act dated 15-11- 2022. The learned assessing officer i.e. Central Circle 29 Delhi was Page

SHAKUNTALAM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY EAST DELHI,NEW DELHI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)- 3, DELHI

In the result, the assessees’ appeals are allowed

trusts/ societies for personal use and unexplained investments. The cases belonging to Smt Sudha Gupta and Shri Devendra Gupta group including the assessee were centralized to Central Circle 29 from Circle (Exemptions) 1(1), Delhi vide order passed under Section 127 of the Act dated 15-11- 2022. The learned assessing officer i.e. Central Circle 29 Delhi was Page

PRESIDIUM EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,DELHI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) - 3 , DELHI

In the result, the assessees’ appeals are allowed

trusts/ societies for personal use and unexplained investments. The cases belonging to Smt Sudha Gupta and Shri Devendra Gupta group including the assessee were centralized to Central Circle 29 from Circle (Exemptions) 1(1), Delhi vide order passed under Section 127 of the Act dated 15-11- 2022. The learned assessing officer i.e. Central Circle 29 Delhi was Page

ADARSH SHIV SHAKTI SHIKSHA SAMITI,DELHI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) - 3, DELHI

In the result, the assessees’ appeals are allowed

trusts/ societies for personal use and unexplained investments. The cases belonging to Smt Sudha Gupta and Shri Devendra Gupta group including the assessee were centralized to Central Circle 29 from Circle (Exemptions) 1(1), Delhi vide order passed under Section 127 of the Act dated 15-11- 2022. The learned assessing officer i.e. Central Circle 29 Delhi was Page

MMTC LTD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1),,

In the result, the assessees’ appeals are allowed

Bench: SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

trusts/ societies for personal use and unexplained investments. The cases belonging to Smt Sudha Gupta and Shri Devendra Gupta group including the assessee were centralized to Central Circle 29 from Circle (Exemptions) 1(1), Delhi vide order passed under Section 127 of the Act dated 15-11- 2022. The learned assessing officer i.e. Central Circle 29 Delhi was Page