BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

58 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 276clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka426Delhi58Mumbai51Bangalore47Hyderabad40Jaipur17Ahmedabad16Calcutta16Allahabad12Chennai10Rajkot10Kolkata8Chandigarh5Nagpur4Pune4Agra4Lucknow3Rajasthan3Visakhapatnam2Indore2SC2Telangana2Amritsar1Cuttack1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 153A42Addition to Income26Disallowance22Section 153C21Section 12A18Section 1118Section 143(3)17Section 36(1)(viia)15Section 13214

KPMG FOUNDATION,GURGAON vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), FARIDABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3517/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri G.C. Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Jain, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(3)

section 11 of the Act in the absence of connection of such expenses with the people engaged in the activities of the trust.” 2. The facts in brief are that assessee is a public charitable trust which was constituted by trust deed dated 27.7.2005 with the objectives of providing; i) relief to the poor; ii) education; iii) medical relief

Showing 1–20 of 58 · Page 1 of 3

Deduction12
Section 40A(2)9
Natural Justice8

ACIT(E),CIRCLE-1(1), NEW DELHI vs. DIVYA JYOTI JAGRATI SANSTHAN, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 4188/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Yagyasaini Kakkar, CIT DR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 115BSection 12ASection 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 32Section 32(1)Section 80G

trust deed. AO also held that the overall activities carried out by the assessee during the relevant accounting period fell between the ambit of ‘charitable purpose’ as per definitions contained in section 2(15) and benefit of exemption under section 11 and 12 has to be allowed. 4. AO noted that during the year under consideration, the assessee had received

AMIT RASTOGI HUF,MEERUT vs. ITO, WARD- 1(1), MEERUT

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2128/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Oct 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: S/Shri K. Sampath & V. Raj KumarFor Respondent: Ms. Ashona Neb, Sr.D.R
Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 40A(2)

Charitable Prajnalaya Trust and pointed out that in Assessment Year 1989- 90 the gross profit rate on sale of kattha by the Trust was 21%; for the Assessment Year 1990-91 it was 13.81%; for the Assessment Year 1991-92 it was 14.8%; and for the Assessment Year 1992-93 it was 20.04% which averages to 17.4%. Such an assessment

M/S. SHANKAR TRADING CO. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2245/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: S/Shri K. Sampath & V. Raj KumarFor Respondent: Ms. Ashona Neb, Sr.D.R
Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 40A(2)

Charitable Prajnalaya Trust and pointed out that in Assessment Year 1989- 90 the gross profit rate on sale of kattha by the Trust was 21%; for the Assessment Year 1990-91 it was 13.81%; for the Assessment Year 1991-92 it was 14.8%; and for the Assessment Year 1992-93 it was 20.04% which averages to 17.4%. Such an assessment

M/S. SHANKAR TRADING CO. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2244/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: S/Shri K. Sampath & V. Raj KumarFor Respondent: Ms. Ashona Neb, Sr.D.R
Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 40A(2)

Charitable Prajnalaya Trust and pointed out that in Assessment Year 1989- 90 the gross profit rate on sale of kattha by the Trust was 21%; for the Assessment Year 1990-91 it was 13.81%; for the Assessment Year 1991-92 it was 14.8%; and for the Assessment Year 1992-93 it was 20.04% which averages to 17.4%. Such an assessment

M/S. SHANKAR TRADING CO. (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5126/DEL/2014[1992-93]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Oct 2018AY 1992-93

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: S/Shri K. Sampath & V. Raj KumarFor Respondent: Ms. Ashona Neb, Sr.D.R
Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 40A(2)

Charitable Prajnalaya Trust and pointed out that in Assessment Year 1989- 90 the gross profit rate on sale of kattha by the Trust was 21%; for the Assessment Year 1990-91 it was 13.81%; for the Assessment Year 1991-92 it was 14.8%; and for the Assessment Year 1992-93 it was 20.04% which averages to 17.4%. Such an assessment

ANAND KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5947/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) passed in ITA 4136/Del/2017 (AY 2011-12). 4. On the other Ld. CIT(DR) relied upon the orders of the authorities below and stated that during the year under consideration, assessee and his family members purchased the shares of M/s Instant Travel and Tours Pvt. Ltd. which later amalgamated with M/s Focus Industrial Resources

ANAND JAIN HUF,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5945/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) passed in ITA 4136/Del/2017 (AY 2011-12). 4. On the other Ld. CIT(DR) relied upon the orders of the authorities below and stated that during the year under consideration, assessee and his family members purchased the shares of M/s Instant Travel and Tours Pvt. Ltd. which later amalgamated with M/s Focus Industrial Resources

ANAND JAIN HUF,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5946/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) passed in ITA 4136/Del/2017 (AY 2011-12). 4. On the other Ld. CIT(DR) relied upon the orders of the authorities below and stated that during the year under consideration, assessee and his family members purchased the shares of M/s Instant Travel and Tours Pvt. Ltd. which later amalgamated with M/s Focus Industrial Resources

ANAND KUMAR JAIN,FARIDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4723/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) passed in ITA 4136/Del/2017 (AY 2011-12). 4. On the other Ld. CIT(DR) relied upon the orders of the authorities below and stated that during the year under consideration, assessee and his family members purchased the shares of M/s Instant Travel and Tours Pvt. Ltd. which later amalgamated with M/s Focus Industrial Resources

SATISH DEV JAIN,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5955/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) passed in ITA 4136/Del/2017 (AY 2011-12). 4. On the other Ld. CIT(DR) relied upon the orders of the authorities below and stated that during the year under consideration, assessee and his family members purchased the shares of M/s Instant Travel and Tours Pvt. Ltd. which later amalgamated with M/s Focus Industrial Resources

ANAND KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5948/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) passed in ITA 4136/Del/2017 (AY 2011-12). 4. On the other Ld. CIT(DR) relied upon the orders of the authorities below and stated that during the year under consideration, assessee and his family members purchased the shares of M/s Instant Travel and Tours Pvt. Ltd. which later amalgamated with M/s Focus Industrial Resources

SAJAN KUMAR JAIN,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5949/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153C

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) passed in ITA 4136/Del/2017 (AY 2011-12). 4. On the other Ld. CIT(DR) relied upon the orders of the authorities below and stated that during the year under consideration, assessee and his family members purchased the shares of M/s Instant Travel and Tours Pvt. Ltd. which later amalgamated with M/s Focus Industrial Resources

SHREE SEO CHAND DHARMARTH SANSTHAN,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 9185/DEL/2019[-]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 May 2022

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Yash Pal Rawla, CAFor Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 80G

section 13(1)(c) of the I. T. Act, 1961, why the application for registration u/s 12A and approval 80G should not be rejected...." 12. The assessee trust submitted reply of show cause notice explaining that the trust has become the owner of the land and building of charitable Dharamshala and the trustees have no interest, claim and right

SHREE SEO CHAND DHARMARTH SANSTHAN,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 9184/DEL/2019[-]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 May 2022

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Yash Pal Rawla, CAFor Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 80G

section 13(1)(c) of the I. T. Act, 1961, why the application for registration u/s 12A and approval 80G should not be rejected...." 12. The assessee trust submitted reply of show cause notice explaining that the trust has become the owner of the land and building of charitable Dharamshala and the trustees have no interest, claim and right

M/S. SHANKAR TRADING CO. (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5510/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.D. Agarwal & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Amit Katoch, Sr.D.R
Section 143(3)Section 40A(2)

Charitable Prajnalaya Trust and pointed out that in Assessment Year 1989-90 the gross profit rate on sale of kattha by the Trust was 21%; for the Assessment Year 1990-91 it was 13.81%; for the Assessment Year 1991- 92 it was 14.8%; and for the Assessment Year 1992-93 it was 20.04% which averages to 17.4%. Such an assessment

VAISH MODEL PRIMARY SCHOOL EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHIWANI vs. ASSESSING OFFICER EXEMPTION, ROHTAK

The appeal is allowed

ITA 3325/DEL/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmaassessment Year : 2009-10 Vaish Model Primary School Vs. Ao (Exemption), Education Society, Income Tax Office, Near Denot Gate, Loharu Gate, Rohtak. Haryana – 127021. Pan: Aaaav4102H

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Bassi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Jitender Singh, CIT-DR
Section 10

276 (SC) has laid down following conclusions: a. It is held that the requirement of the charitable institution, society or trust etc., to 'solely' engage itself in education or educational activities and not engage in any activity of profit, means that such institutions cannot have objects which are unrelated to education. In other words, all objects of the society, trust

SHANKAR TRADING CO. PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 23(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 142/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Aug 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Madhumita Roy[A.Y 2014-15]

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Prakash Dubey, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

Charitable Prajnalaya Trust and pointed out that in Assessment Year 1989- 90 the gross profit rate on sale of kattha by the Trust was 21%; for the Assessment Year 1990-91 it was 13.81%; for the Assessment Year 1991-92 it was 14.8%; and for the Assessment Year 1992-93 it was 20.04% which averages to 17.4%. Such an assessment

SATISH GUJRAL vs. ADDL CIT RANGE -32,

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly

ITA 3397/DEL/2007[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jul 2016AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Shri M.P. Rastogi, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Anima Bernwal, Sr-DR
Section 143(1)Section 80RSection 80U

Charitable Trust 264 ITR 276 (Del), CIT vs. ARJ Security Printers 113 ITD 624 (Del - T.M.), DCIT vs. Jindal Photo Films 304 ITR (AT) 76 (Mum), IRB Infrastructure Ltd. vs. ITO. We also find that the ld. CIT(A) has held that once having held that the method of accounting of the appellant is that professional fee was recorded only

SHANKAR TRADING COMPANY P. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 651/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Aug 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

Charitable Trust agreeing not to indulge in competition with the assessee within a radius less than 1000 kms from the demises property, constitutes capital expenditure. 3.1 The assessee in compliance to the order of the Hon’ble High Court attributed different percentage of enhanced lease rentals towards revenue expenditure and worked out nil expenditure towards capital expenditure. Computation